summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/ea/d8f0f903bae9fdfa3977d449f8d837d6881027
blob: 265b255241b7a0db14ac5f5af08f659d5fbf3beb (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <bip@mattwhitlock.name>) id 1Z3Tol-0000yk-Bw
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Fri, 12 Jun 2015 18:36:39 +0000
X-ACL-Warn: 
Received: from resqmta-ch2-04v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.36])
	by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1Z3Tok-0007xN-Kx
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Fri, 12 Jun 2015 18:36:39 +0000
Received: from resomta-ch2-02v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.98])
	by resqmta-ch2-04v.sys.comcast.net with comcast
	id fWa01q00A27uzMh01WcZmT; Fri, 12 Jun 2015 18:36:33 +0000
Received: from crushinator.localnet
	([IPv6:2601:186:c000:825e:e9f4:8901:87c7:24a0])
	by resomta-ch2-02v.sys.comcast.net with comcast
	id fWcY1q0054eLRLv01WcYQh; Fri, 12 Jun 2015 18:36:33 +0000
From: Matt Whitlock <bip@mattwhitlock.name>
To: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 14:36:31 -0400
Message-ID: <3287607.HcH18TyfSu@crushinator>
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.9 (Linux/3.18.12-gentoo; KDE/4.14.9; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <20150612183421.GE19199@muck>
References: <20150612181153.GB19199@muck> <23144512.HX7dfatEFr@crushinator>
	<20150612183421.GE19199@muck>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
	no trust [69.252.207.36 listed in list.dnswl.org]
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1Z3Tok-0007xN-Kx
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 18:36:39 -0000

On Friday, 12 June 2015, at 7:34 pm, Peter Todd wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 02:22:36PM -0400, Matt Whitlock wrote:
> > Why should miners only be able to vote for "double the limit" or "halve" the limit? If you're going to use bits, I think you need to use two bits:
> > 
> > 	0 0 = no preference ("wildcard" vote)
> > 	0 1 = vote for the limit to remain the same
> > 	1 0 = vote for the limit to be halved
> > 	1 1 = vote for the limit to be doubled
> > 
> > User transactions would follow the same usage. In particular, a user vote of "0 0" (no preference) could be included in a block casting any vote, but a block voting "0 0" (no preference) could only contain transactions voting "0 0" as well.
> 
> Sounds like a good encoding to me. Taking the median of the three
> options, and throwing away "don't care" votes entirely, makes sense.

I hope you mean the *plurality* of the three options after throwing away the "don't cares," not the *median*.