1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
|
Return-Path: <damian@willtech.com.au>
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05B66C0011
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 23 Feb 2022 07:24:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02EF960F1D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 23 Feb 2022 07:24:57 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.032
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.032 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665]
autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: smtp3.osuosl.org (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral
reason="invalid (public key: not available)" header.d=willtech.com.au
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id xJPFZ_h2pNxa
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 23 Feb 2022 07:24:56 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from bat.birch.relay.mailchannels.net
(bat.birch.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.209.13])
by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D06260B53
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 23 Feb 2022 07:24:56 +0000 (UTC)
X-Sender-Id: hostpapa|x-authuser|damian@willtech.com.au
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5689A6C0D85;
Wed, 23 Feb 2022 07:24:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from s110.servername.online (unknown [127.0.0.6])
(Authenticated sender: hostpapa)
by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C18976C1380;
Wed, 23 Feb 2022 07:24:53 +0000 (UTC)
ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-2022; d=mailchannels.net; t=1645601093; a=rsa-sha256;
cv=none;
b=jxuYkW74sXJaCFVf5scosG0v86KoegwYHem8U5qBH3OypvogRhYO5jbwr7TFdRQFBiUv9l
viL5T0POgObRMgQ/nAxEDJkQS3IbeUAnOyOsnS40rztsLH+aokMO8hzARt49vQPij94pvm
Amuy/wZ/4xxbZPIlDYYuWklFlI97HEVmnK+koy38z9Q3AtnP2WVIwMXZ6x1gJLZ5jitM5C
W9oqdGfaj6A5bGe9K7PmwqeJkiZNpkHHIEPpRd0hfOM2qvwR3+wPmZmSMGA2wI/XKNgdfZ
n+UedRwDNa8/B3ZCXinEe449tAJmO4ehGDIpMsiYO50THMa45LMo1WqwjmQkJA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=mailchannels.net; s=arc-2022; t=1645601093;
h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:
in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature;
bh=v89Mo+qnGwAJtmIQb82ye+b8SJP+wvsKISSs0CbMerk=;
b=SoSg5yTpoDJmh6BIHv7eAId7SCRoG2eNmOdpTd0t0hLDVGx3KkcY9P1H6TDTRnHW2yQcG0
1OgOBY57hKkZBHZ9sNiyA6tZlQYRo6HZHFVYVqsJ4VVAPe6+VhRQcyOLb0eM3mX97qzkOu
irFeTHxT7C61gvMK7pE/QJoJrAXJmda/Spg8nN4gfvKxzR2G+9el9LdQ/oWZwfdviTC4iK
Ipd5xlNngMmrKwZN5+Jk48vVRiqIpxrA3dzmrP/Ng3pA73lU+LxSZOqWQW4PCQQIPZHnWv
jRnjTvb+E0QBom0fsElMQff/UBfWo9cAZeVGkYViiwEEHqikLTPb5f4Vri3jcg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; rspamd-78dc4959d8-lt8qc;
auth=pass smtp.auth=hostpapa smtp.mailfrom=damian@willtech.com.au
X-Sender-Id: hostpapa|x-authuser|damian@willtech.com.au
Received: from s110.servername.online (s110.servername.online [204.44.192.22])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384)
by 100.112.55.205 (trex/6.5.3); Wed, 23 Feb 2022 07:24:54 +0000
X-MC-Relay: Junk
X-MailChannels-SenderId: hostpapa|x-authuser|damian@willtech.com.au
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: hostpapa
X-Invention-Illegal: 6bf09adc5fc519ea_1645601094099_3643892019
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1645601094098:770577709
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1645601094098
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=willtech.com.au; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:
Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To:From:Date:MIME-Version:Sender:
Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:
List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
bh=v89Mo+qnGwAJtmIQb82ye+b8SJP+wvsKISSs0CbMerk=; b=JB3tIKWB0z4kofuBxLTBpHBVO5
omkHDeDSofEsqd4QY7vmeRcAzu7AfZPf8bjGwUaLHisPAVRwrJLLd7kdGL38bF92X8tOrMXTPbyuH
njte5qqys5A9dfCHvw9R/jumbbWFcH4zknlmBsRmjC1XV593AJIm9TxxfotzwViRYau2N9h+iPw6i
SHEnILR1nhBhH2cteWo5Y3qTYvCUSs2iA8sIvURp8Xv0YUX0O0/KngV3pdvDLvJ89WjrSRYYU6xcI
neVs0MjAnPrMDurOT7Z3gKVAT7oN7ydpUsebzr5o3FTK8v6R5nSotMmzFo2g4P+rxYA0vllCGGR5T
KWdTxTJg==;
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38778 helo=s110.servername.online)
by s110.servername.online with esmtpa (Exim 4.94.2)
(envelope-from <damian@willtech.com.au>)
id 1nMm17-00HPvv-62; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 23:24:53 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 18:24:52 +1100
From: damian@willtech.com.au
To: Casey Rodarmor <casey@rodarmor.com>, Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <0642a5e59464779569f9d0aab452ee27@willtech.com.au>
References: <CANLPe+OZ33vcZheOyo2RdrvWzQvj3RzZc6sHTafGwbqEG2G4pA@mail.gmail.com>
<0642a5e59464779569f9d0aab452ee27@willtech.com.au>
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.12
Message-ID: <96471a093e3c3d9862c3d47ebe731df6@willtech.com.au>
X-Sender: damian@willtech.com.au
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AuthUser: damian@willtech.com.au
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 21:48:21 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Draft-BIP: Ordinal Numbers
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 07:24:57 -0000
At the moment it is indisputable that a particular satoshi cannot be
proven, an amount of Bitcoin is a bag of satoshi's and no-one can tell
which ones are any particular ones **so even if you used the system of
ordinals privately, and it might make interesting for research, I cannot
see that it would be sensible to be adopted** as it can only cause
trouble. If I receive some Bitcoin I cannot know if some or any of those
have been at any point in the past been stolen, I assume the transaction
is honest, and in all likelihood it is likely that it is. The least
reasonable thing I could expect is some claimed former holder of some
ordianls turning up to challenge me that it was their stolen Bitcoin was
some of what I received.
NACK
-DA.
On 2022-02-23 18:02, damian@willtech.com.au wrote:
> Well done, your bip looks well presented for discussion. You say to
> number each satoshi created? For a 50 BTC block reward that is
> 5,000,000,000 ordinal numbers, and when some BTC is transferred to
> another UTXO how do you determine which ordinal numbers, say if I
> create a transaction to pay-to another UTXO. The system sounds
> expensive eventually to cope with approximately 2,100,000,000,000,000
> ordinals. If I understand ordinals 0 to 5,000,000,000 as assigned to
> the first Bitcoin created from mining block-reward. Say if I send some
> Bitcoin to another UTXO then first-in-first-out algorithm splits those
> up to assign 1 to 100,000,000 to the 1 BTC that I sent, and
> 100,000,001 to 5,000,000,000 are assigned to the change plus if any
> fee?-DA.
>
> On 2022-02-23 11:43, Casey Rodarmor via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>> Briefly, newly mined satoshis are sequentially numbered in the order
>> in
>> which they are mined. These numbers are called "ordinal numbers" or
>> "ordinals". When satoshis are spent in a transaction, the input
>> satoshi
>> ordinal numbers are assigned to output satoshis using a simple
>> first-in-first-out algorithm.
|
