1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
|
Return-Path: <luke@dashjr.org>
Received: from whitealder.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6191CC013B
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 16 Dec 2020 17:17:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by whitealder.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 505D084E10
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 16 Dec 2020 17:17:00 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
Received: from whitealder.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id lfaLWPOR0gli
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 16 Dec 2020 17:16:58 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from zinan.dashjr.org (zinan.dashjr.org [192.3.11.21])
by whitealder.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3496184CE0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 16 Dec 2020 17:16:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ishibashi.lan (unknown [12.190.236.220])
(Authenticated sender: luke-jr)
by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AAA8738A09D3;
Wed, 16 Dec 2020 17:16:56 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=dashjr.org; s=zinan;
t=1608139016; bh=NRGkBZWZbgYMgE4lb13IZNbM3ydc3kZMUqPdpIloKm4=;
h=From:To:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To;
b=h6USBTPO23I+qV8xD2Po50w4XKgChCRJQaWrEqbhnEI0w3nSAM7WkRBxBa0fFa42t
uglfWKoVNlA36gYcqr7o/jb8wiFnSBYSP5frMcH+Xqy8JM/8MEG5QJIcsw87fu9+Cu
VZ+LSS8lJdMBhRAfAWK3/zgwDZqGwWrdcldmUqQw=
From: Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
dentondevelopment <dentondevelopment@protonmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 17:16:54 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10
References: <cLqW9ZphcaV5hoVNYHjHk_DsdVw_0_hdFxOFwtFkVT9_N_E1IF7ZvtQq745wbqMnny4xzHe8Xdd9TTi2MLyLhB51cI_PJc4fIjLRSpZpGwk=@protonmail.com>
<1_mYgDaVRKZIADl9fWVzTYGNBr0Z43Fp-Gcoz2ibhKY4VKAk1Vbs9XSZ3rlzyGEwvE2YEOn2C0IxAVKkr_rr6KX0YxMiNTiTtQVBL4vgyd8=@protonmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1_mYgDaVRKZIADl9fWVzTYGNBr0Z43Fp-Gcoz2ibhKY4VKAk1Vbs9XSZ3rlzyGEwvE2YEOn2C0IxAVKkr_rr6KX0YxMiNTiTtQVBL4vgyd8=@protonmail.com>
X-KMail-QuotePrefix: >
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <202012161716.54878.luke@dashjr.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] bip48 proposal
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 17:17:00 -0000
BIP number 48 has not been assigned. Do not self-assign BIP numbers.
Is this intended to be compatible with=20
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/253 ?
Luke
On Wednesday 16 December 2020 14:10:28 dentondevelopment via bitcoin-dev=20
wrote:
> Here is the repo instead of a static link:
> https://github.com/Fonta1n3/bips/blob/master/bip-0048.mediawiki
>
> Fontaine
>
> Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
>
> =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 Original =
Message =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90
>
> On Wednesday, December 16, 2020 8:43 PM, dentondevelopment via bitcoin-de=
v=20
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I would like to propose bip48 (taking bip44 as inspiration), with the
> > purpose of documenting modern multi-sig derivations.
> >
> > Please see a rough draft of the proposed bip attached, comments/input
> > welcome.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Fontaine
|
