1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
|
Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EC1B978
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 29 Sep 2017 09:55:45 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from outmail148108.authsmtp.net (outmail148108.authsmtp.net
[62.13.148.108])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FB481A6
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 29 Sep 2017 09:55:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-c245.authsmtp.com (mail-c245.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.245])
by punt23.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id v8T9tgNI024155;
Fri, 29 Sep 2017 10:55:42 +0100 (BST)
Received: from petertodd.org (ec2-52-5-185-120.compute-1.amazonaws.com
[52.5.185.120]) (authenticated bits=0)
by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id v8T9td9K040065
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Fri, 29 Sep 2017 10:55:40 +0100 (BST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by petertodd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A22E14010A;
Fri, 29 Sep 2017 09:55:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id D347B205E4; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 05:55:37 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 05:55:37 -0400
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Andreas Schildbach <andreas@schildbach.de>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Message-ID: <20170929095537.GA15286@savin.petertodd.org>
References: <20170927160654.GA12492@savin.petertodd.org>
<oqihpf$5gc$1@blaine.gmane.org>
<20170929014543.GB11956@savin.petertodd.org>
<oql14j$4qq$1@blaine.gmane.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <oql14j$4qq$1@blaine.gmane.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-Server-Quench: 59fa7820-a4fc-11e7-801f-9cb654bb2504
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
aAdMdAsUC1AEAgsB AmEbWlReVVh7XWM7 bghPaBtcak9QXgdq
T0pMXVMcUg0MCFhV D2UeVhlycQAIfXx2 YQhnVyYKW0x4dVss
RhgHCGwHMGB9YGAe Bl1RJFFSdQcYLB1A alQxNiYHcQ5VPz4z
GA41ejw8IwAXAShZ WAwWNhofUV4KBDcg RhcEVSkuGEAeDz4z
KAEiJhYWEQ4YPkk/ PRM9XhoyEidXU1IF dwAA
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1039:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 52.5.185.120/25
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Address expiration times should be added to
BIP-173
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 09:55:45 -0000
--7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 10:44:11AM +0200, Andreas Schildbach via bitcoin-de=
v wrote:
> On 09/29/2017 03:45 AM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:09:59PM +0200, Andreas Schildbach via bitcoi=
n-dev wrote:
> >> This feels redundant to me; the payment protocol already has an
> >> expiration time.
> >=20
> > I'm well aware. As the payment protocol hasn't caught on - and doesn't =
fully
> > overlap all the usecases that addresses do anyway - I think we should c=
onsider
> > bringing this important feature to Bitcoin addresses too.
>=20
> Hasn't caught on? It is used for virtually all merchant transactions,
> plus person to person transactions between Bitcoin Wallet users.
"Virtually all"?
I regularly pay with Bitcoin, and I haven't seen the payment protocol used =
in
ages.
Can you name some users of it?
--=20
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
--7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJZzhiVAAoJECSBQD2l8JH72FAIALY1TvVSyyDNW26xlJ6oNvVe
ttRC41iAKnIxq4kuNlXnf0QGxEhTnDRdLj+Lfq4ZeGGlUBzrTzaw19CWu3GLdmpk
giT9suWgzGyPVSNVXjTEWnzegIPjvSWczR6hke0G4ODU70XJ/9yu/cho+97UEvHr
c503EnuVwsG1QKCj0bAgKme0qhDi9ywiLvkF8ayTGPeRAnThJoDho0ZOjucGgxZ9
EEGvNzi0OoWiCjYnXkSZRIr2wQe/9ZX919v0JMHw5Ma3dV+ISBeTkFazCbHeizQS
n89MLIs9m46N1uhWMYgqQVJeq/V3r1xfJFfaJUl8s951FpTBdZea6n8af/zBAWM=
=iwbr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH--
|
