summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/e9/40de48bd391875f871790c19ff08712f104598
blob: e1e8a62e8f53d97babb475de3bf43b18128622b1 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <mh.in.england@gmail.com>) id 1VAL8d-0001eV-9c
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Fri, 16 Aug 2013 14:36:27 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.214.181 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.214.181; envelope-from=mh.in.england@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-ob0-f181.google.com; 
Received: from mail-ob0-f181.google.com ([209.85.214.181])
	by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1VAL8b-0000fC-UH
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Fri, 16 Aug 2013 14:36:27 +0000
Received: by mail-ob0-f181.google.com with SMTP id dn14so2161271obc.12
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Fri, 16 Aug 2013 07:36:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.230.135 with SMTP id sy7mr1572813obc.24.1376663780523;
	Fri, 16 Aug 2013 07:36:20 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: mh.in.england@gmail.com
Received: by 10.76.80.165 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 07:36:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAEz79PoK9u9ffJ5jR8yXk8eCFP0Ytk_bno0mpcpM24mt-GGg5w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABsx9T32q8mKgtmsaZgh7nuhHY5cExeW=FiadzXq3jXVP=NBTw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANEZrP0PEcP339MKRyrHXHCCsP3BxRHT-ZfKRQ7G2Ou+15CD7A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANEZrP3LAR0erjgmTHruLwPNDdx-OVyb9KK52E6UnmE4ZuBrvQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130816140116.GB16201@petertodd.org>
	<20130816141536.GD16201@petertodd.org>
	<CAEz79PoK9u9ffJ5jR8yXk8eCFP0Ytk_bno0mpcpM24mt-GGg5w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 16:36:20 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: vC_ZV4hll-XepuTcUxbGJo4GeKI
Message-ID: <CANEZrP3hHh3k5+ePGbqVeyo3oV=RTy36FA+8MbOZXg3yMqRxAw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
To: "Warren Togami Jr." <wtogami@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c336769d33ab04e41183db
X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(mh.in.england[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1VAL8b-0000fC-UH
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Gavin's post-0.9 TODO list...
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 14:36:27 -0000

--001a11c336769d33ab04e41183db
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

That change was made in response to user complaints. Heck we get complaints
about battery life and bandwidth impact even with Bloom filtering. We can't
just randomly start using peoples bandwidth for relaying blocks, especially
as I guess most SPV nodes are behind NAT.

If Gavin is right and the future is dominated by mobiles and tablets, then
it will require a change of thinking in how P2P networks work. I think
there are plenty of people with private servers who would be willing to run
nodes though. I'm not too worried about this.


On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Warren Togami Jr. <wtogami@gmail.com>wrote:

> bitcoinj-0.10 release notes:
>
>    - We now require Bloom-capable (0.8+) peers by default and will
>    disconnect from older nodes. This avoids accidental bandwidth saturation on
>    mobile devices.
>
> Given the user-security concern that Peter brings up, reconsideration of
> this new default behavior in SPV clients may be warranted.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 4:15 AM, Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:01:16AM -0400, Peter Todd wrote:
>> > Doing this also makes it more difficult to sybil the network - for
>> > instance right now you can create "SPV honeypots" that allow incoming
>> > connections only from SPV nodes, thus attracting a disproportionate % of
>> > the total SPV population given a relatively small number of nodes. You
>> > can then use that to harm SPV nodes by, for instance, making a % of
>> > transactions be dropped deterministicly, either by the bloom matching
>> > code, or when sent. Users unlucky enough to be surrounded by sybil nodes
>> > will have their transactions mysteriously fail to arrive in their
>> > wallets, or have their transactions mysteriously never confirm. Given
>> > how few full nodes there are, it probably won't take very many honeypots
>> > to pull off this attack, especially if you combine it with a
>> > simultaneous max connections or bloom io attack to degrade the capacity
>> > of honest nodes.
>>
>> Oh, here's an even better way to do the "tx drop" attack: when you drop
>> a transaction, make a fake one that pays the same scriptPubKeys with the
>> same amount, and send it to the SPV peer instead. They'll see the
>> transaction go through and show up in their wallet, but it'll look like
>> it got stuck and never confirmed. They'll soon wind up with a wallet
>> full of useless transactions, effectively locking them out of their
>> money.
>>
>> Here's another question for you Mike: So does bitcoinj have any
>> protections against peers flooding you with useless garbage? It'd be
>> easy to rack up a user's data bill for instance by just creating junk
>> unconfirmed transactions matching the bloom filter.
>>
>> --
>> 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
>> 0000000000000018dcf5bcc3f018a05517ba1c479b432ba422015d4506496e55
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite!
>> It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production.
>> Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead.
>> Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes.
>>
>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bitcoin-development mailing list
>> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>>
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite!
> It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production.
> Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead.
> Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
>

--001a11c336769d33ab04e41183db
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">That change was made in response to user complaints. Heck =
we get complaints about battery life and bandwidth impact even with Bloom f=
iltering. We can&#39;t just randomly start using peoples bandwidth for rela=
ying blocks, especially as I guess most SPV nodes are behind NAT.<div>
<br></div><div>If Gavin is right and the future is dominated by mobiles and=
 tablets, then it will require a change of thinking in how P2P networks wor=
k. I think there are plenty of people with private servers who would be wil=
ling to run nodes though. I&#39;m not too worried about this.</div>
</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Fri,=
 Aug 16, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Warren Togami Jr. <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=
=3D"mailto:wtogami@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">wtogami@gmail.com</a>&gt;</=
span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr">bitcoinj-0.10 release notes=
:<div><ul style=3D"font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.80000019073486=
3px;padding-left:25px;max-width:62em">
<li style=3D"margin-left:15px;margin-bottom:0.3em">We now require Bloom-cap=
able (0.8+) peers by default and will disconnect from older nodes. This avo=
ids accidental bandwidth saturation on mobile devices.</li>
</ul><div><font face=3D"arial, sans-serif">Given the user-security concern =
that Peter brings up, reconsideration of this new default behavior in SPV c=
lients may be warranted.</font></div><div><br></div></div></div><div class=
=3D"gmail_extra">

<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div><div class=3D"h5">On Fri, Aug 16, 2=
013 at 4:15 AM, Peter Todd <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:pete@pet=
ertodd.org" target=3D"_blank">pete@petertodd.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><=
/div>
</div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-l=
eft:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div class=3D"h5">
<div>On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:01:16AM -0400, Peter Todd wrote:<br>
&gt; Doing this also makes it more difficult to sybil the network - for<br>
&gt; instance right now you can create &quot;SPV honeypots&quot; that allow=
 incoming<br>
&gt; connections only from SPV nodes, thus attracting a disproportionate % =
of<br>
&gt; the total SPV population given a relatively small number of nodes. You=
<br>
&gt; can then use that to harm SPV nodes by, for instance, making a % of<br=
>
&gt; transactions be dropped deterministicly, either by the bloom matching<=
br>
&gt; code, or when sent. Users unlucky enough to be surrounded by sybil nod=
es<br>
&gt; will have their transactions mysteriously fail to arrive in their<br>
&gt; wallets, or have their transactions mysteriously never confirm. Given<=
br>
&gt; how few full nodes there are, it probably won&#39;t take very many hon=
eypots<br>
&gt; to pull off this attack, especially if you combine it with a<br>
&gt; simultaneous max connections or bloom io attack to degrade the capacit=
y<br>
&gt; of honest nodes.<br>
<br>
</div>Oh, here&#39;s an even better way to do the &quot;tx drop&quot; attac=
k: when you drop<br>
a transaction, make a fake one that pays the same scriptPubKeys with the<br=
>
same amount, and send it to the SPV peer instead. They&#39;ll see the<br>
transaction go through and show up in their wallet, but it&#39;ll look like=
<br>
it got stuck and never confirmed. They&#39;ll soon wind up with a wallet<br=
>
full of useless transactions, effectively locking them out of their<br>
money.<br>
<br>
Here&#39;s another question for you Mike: So does bitcoinj have any<br>
protections against peers flooding you with useless garbage? It&#39;d be<br=
>
easy to rack up a user&#39;s data bill for instance by just creating junk<b=
r>
unconfirmed transactions matching the bloom filter.<br>
<div><div><br>
--<br>
&#39;peter&#39;[:-1]@<a href=3D"http://petertodd.org" target=3D"_blank">pet=
ertodd.org</a><br>
0000000000000018dcf5bcc3f018a05517ba1c479b432ba422015d4506496e55<br>
</div></div><br></div></div><div class=3D"im">-----------------------------=
-------------------------------------------------<br>
Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite!<br>
It&#39;s a free troubleshooting tool designed for production.<br>
Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with &lt;2% overhead.<br>
Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes.<br>
<a href=3D"http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=3D48897031&amp;iu=
=3D/4140/ostg.clktrk" target=3D"_blank">http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gam=
pad/clk?id=3D48897031&amp;iu=3D/4140/ostg.clktrk</a><br>___________________=
____________________________<br>


Bitcoin-development mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net" target=3D"_bla=
nk">Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development=
" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de=
velopment</a><br>
<br></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
<br>-----------------------------------------------------------------------=
-------<br>
Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite!<br>
It&#39;s a free troubleshooting tool designed for production.<br>
Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with &lt;2% overhead.<br>
Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes.<br>
<a href=3D"http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=3D48897031&amp;iu=
=3D/4140/ostg.clktrk" target=3D"_blank">http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gam=
pad/clk?id=3D48897031&amp;iu=3D/4140/ostg.clktrk</a><br>___________________=
____________________________<br>

Bitcoin-development mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net">Bitcoin-develo=
pment@lists.sourceforge.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development=
" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de=
velopment</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>

--001a11c336769d33ab04e41183db--