1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
|
Return-Path: <btcdrak@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3824BCB
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 3 Apr 2017 14:40:25 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-yb0-f177.google.com (mail-yb0-f177.google.com
[209.85.213.177])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5507A24C
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 3 Apr 2017 14:40:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-yb0-f177.google.com with SMTP id i124so34744493ybc.3
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 03 Apr 2017 07:40:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=PEZcQinnffC3/VvG0mYrm4Vx96XHXoYc8VF7slykAzk=;
b=h0ZQzu1ZQhxugzdxHxtAE7eZ88RtfxFxLT/a7PlrNM5HvQDesRb9bQfjE2oNCWbIg7
C2Gg/jO+p4Kd64/eKAAruZAj68gyMU3SMQaysci6TI7/kmyg7y4xmCUynoFPI6b5uDun
cqahZ3nGjImvIswLB/3v2AJxrP1Yxh7oWxWRORQYLlP0WwXbh7np1cFX8Yeiqv9qQKIJ
abO3snRC4T9Fy2EjrOHZapcSnux3OR2xO7obhOpZmGiYp6L+k6s7Y5woQH3aOvZwqAq8
A1mP63Y0fOyPquDvZb+JHXk3lCrO3wH7lGbxe8Inl2cK8xKf7OQ8kGEOj/bblrSK0O63
9GJA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to;
bh=PEZcQinnffC3/VvG0mYrm4Vx96XHXoYc8VF7slykAzk=;
b=mjIPZuOGW8faKNSJEBkYwINmgwkSN2Tzpi4BOyhaFqNtEM+zuPCR8B4oRQ1QQWIjSb
LpOuczhsFjLtNjyDgwRV8OvHJoiZdkUKFHWubWQOHrypsvwhKUDrW7Ht64ub4oAVQbS9
s+CTU8+xuqpbozver7xh0QhRDIg1ZudAmnTwYKrCRz9Ze91y8jcC+G4qmYf8Qgi55ZQ4
vz+m1l7cX2L5L8ah/uya3dZwMF1/47kJxVOMUBPQewNf4g/LGg4+jBV1ndS2yXU0e1Bj
MCNjEYBTJjCJYGx/7dzt0Y5pRUATQKQYa26rzdOiWkPWeqy0vWRpVqXTG7nj0Sz8U8aK
GFpA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H315zP8f4SDXwFiw32z5HZWXQmQAK/zdUYf+8Kn0chKIEzM0xg3hwsUJf3l9KNkgmo3NE+OMvpXTjGJLA==
X-Received: by 10.129.40.141 with SMTP id o135mr11937183ywo.166.1491230424470;
Mon, 03 Apr 2017 07:40:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.13.222.135 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Apr 2017 07:40:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAKzdR-oN6tGvGSb04_awCf=Jsf3wgKJN5xUhCr8G2D2W9YgJww@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKzdR-oN6tGvGSb04_awCf=Jsf3wgKJN5xUhCr8G2D2W9YgJww@mail.gmail.com>
From: Btc Drak <btcdrak@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 15:40:04 +0100
Message-ID: <CADJgMztpmcC_rv_oKYn_jRhLzx2FbtxgPUshcPDJpQVZYBcJzw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sergio Demian Lerner <sergio.d.lerner@gmail.com>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114087a8ba9c61054c44233f
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM,
HK_RANDOM_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 03 Apr 2017 15:01:58 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Segwit2Mb - combined soft/hard fork - Request For
Comments
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2017 14:40:26 -0000
--001a114087a8ba9c61054c44233f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 10:09 PM, Sergio Demian Lerner via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> The hard-fork is conditional to 95% of the hashing power has approved the
> segwit2mb soft-fork and the segwit soft-fork has been activated (which
> should occur 2016 blocks after its lock-in time)
>
Miners signalling they have upgraded by flipping a bit in the nVersion
field has little relevance in a hard fork. If 100% of the hash power
indicates they are running this proposal, but the nodes don't upgrade, what
will happen?
For the record, I actually talk a lot about hard forks with various
developers and am very interested in the research that Johnson in
particular is pioneering. However, I have failed to understand your point
about 95% miner signalling in relation to a hard fork, so I am eagerly
awaiting your explanation.
--001a114087a8ba9c61054c44233f
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On F=
ri, Mar 31, 2017 at 10:09 PM, Sergio Demian Lerner via bitcoin-dev <span di=
r=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" targ=
et=3D"_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>></span> wrote:<b=
r><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:=
1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div>The hard-fork is con=
ditional to 95% of the hashing power has approved the segwit2mb soft-fork a=
nd the segwit soft-fork has been activated (which should occur 2016 blocks =
after its lock-in time)</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Miners =
signalling they have upgraded by flipping a bit in the nVersion field has l=
ittle relevance in a hard fork. If 100% of the hash power indicates they ar=
e running this proposal, but the nodes don't upgrade, what will happen?=
<br></div><div><br></div><div>For the record, I actually talk a lot about h=
ard forks with various developers and am very interested in the research th=
at Johnson in particular is pioneering. However, I have failed to understan=
d your point about 95% miner signalling in relation to a hard fork, so I am=
eagerly awaiting your explanation.</div></div></div></div>
--001a114087a8ba9c61054c44233f--
|
