1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
|
Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99D5EB10
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 7 Sep 2017 18:00:31 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from outmail149113.authsmtp.com (outmail149113.authsmtp.com
[62.13.149.113])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBA9B8A
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 7 Sep 2017 18:00:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-c245.authsmtp.com (mail-c245.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.245])
by punt23.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id v87I0Nf6089024;
Thu, 7 Sep 2017 19:00:23 +0100 (BST)
Received: from petertodd.org (ec2-52-5-185-120.compute-1.amazonaws.com
[52.5.185.120]) (authenticated bits=0)
by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id v87I0LEo055577
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Thu, 7 Sep 2017 19:00:22 +0100 (BST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by petertodd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 13EE74012D;
Thu, 7 Sep 2017 18:00:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 74C12202B4; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 14:00:14 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 14:00:14 -0400
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Jorge =?iso-8859-1?Q?Tim=F3n?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Message-ID: <20170907180014.GA13727@fedora-23-dvm>
References: <CABm2gDojDQWMhw8wW1UkRGKtdbby2+6AFFZLPuRcUb7WF_u5qQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CABm2gDojDQWMhw8wW1UkRGKtdbby2+6AFFZLPuRcUb7WF_u5qQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-Server-Quench: 6b548a9a-93f6-11e7-801f-9cb654bb2504
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
aAdMdgUUC1AEAgsB AmEbWl1eUF17W2A7 bghPaBtcak9QXgdq
T0pMXVMcUg1veBx9 c0EeVxx3cAIIfX9z ZQhkDHVfVBVzJFt0
QRhSCGwHMGB9YGAe Bl1RJFFSdQcYLB1A alQxNiYHcQ5VPz4z
GA41ejw8IwAXEwod WhsKNVUJSEJZViYm QBADFzQzVVADXD0+
KRAvIFoRVEEMLl0v LUBpRlMEM31aAwhZ AkdRVXcx
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1039:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 52.5.185.120/25
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] SF proposal: prohibit unspendable outputs with
amount=0
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2017 18:00:31 -0000
--NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 11:51:45PM +0200, Jorge Tim=F3n via bitcoin-dev wro=
te:
> This is not a priority, not very important either.
> Right now it is possible to create 0-value outputs that are spendable
> and thus stay in the utxo (potentially forever). Requiring at least 1
> satoshi per output doesn't really do much against a spam attack to the
> utxo, but I think it would be slightly better than the current
> situation.
Given that this has a very minimal cost for spammers - just a single satosh=
i -
I don't think this is worth the risk of making future upgrades more complex=
as
other posters have brought up.
Secondly, I think we have good reason to think that things like my own TXO
commitments and Bram's related work will make UTXO growth a non-issue in the
future.
So, I'd NACK such a proposal myself.
--=20
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
--NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJZsYkuAAoJECSBQD2l8JH7fNYH/1DdSeNZ/jkjP85pL0r8Acep
dMlJYbNFnLt5/OSMlZMi4HVxXqQnEwvGUs2YJPbZ1y3FJhXu0PJ10lGieKqOTsJZ
AX5/nAVPw4F0rMY/Iilx71QuvFVUVWTo1L2+/IlYpu6CJyFm7Vagf2eX+qxwD7Eh
TrRuAG0fldpWpgYttptt1DvkFkyQbuvXHdFRwJQArgb3jIcfzuHiAyjRCjxkozuy
Q2pCJjSCOtUiaPxXpHLeGk9Lokmnv8rt4IMeQrYiHFTBkMfckJNX4O6oTfhvdOaW
SW3817LuvwdK2e9HmT+QnXSN60bBgIXzqdRkYAJ8h4Tx5kcAJtsDbR4PuRN0a8Y=
=tjtD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh--
|
