summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/e4/67719cebb49d4661e7e624726d0f438384b892
blob: a9d59f09654a6214e9f0e64ec8136f07328677e1 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <mh.in.england@gmail.com>) id 1WK4vB-00044N-PU
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sun, 02 Mar 2014 11:51:05 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.219.47 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.219.47; envelope-from=mh.in.england@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-oa0-f47.google.com; 
Received: from mail-oa0-f47.google.com ([209.85.219.47])
	by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1WK4vB-00063b-4D
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sun, 02 Mar 2014 11:51:05 +0000
Received: by mail-oa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id h16so5860654oag.6
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Sun, 02 Mar 2014 03:50:59 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.34.196 with SMTP id b4mr22587755obj.13.1393761059799;
	Sun, 02 Mar 2014 03:50:59 -0800 (PST)
Sender: mh.in.england@gmail.com
Received: by 10.76.71.231 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 03:50:59 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <leuunm$tjk$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <lc5hmg$1jh$1@ger.gmane.org>
	<leuunm$tjk$1@ger.gmane.org>
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 12:50:59 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: G03f9SNk1LKOluxTqEnqTaJx1zc
Message-ID: <CANEZrP3nQfvDArKTRgje0Cus4G2JD_zpxSjA3fXfxM2TNAP80Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
To: Andreas Schildbach <andreas@schildbach.de>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2cba4df0a9504f39e4899
X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(mh.in.england[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1WK4vB-00063b-4D
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Payment Protocol for Face-to-face Payments
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 11:51:05 -0000

--001a11c2cba4df0a9504f39e4899
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Thanks Andreas.

For BIP standardisation, I think the VIEW intent seems like an obvious one.
Bluetooth support probably should come later if/when we put encryption/auth
on the RFCOMM link (probably SSL).

--001a11c2cba4df0a9504f39e4899
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra">Thanks Andreas.</div><div class=
=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra">For BIP standardisati=
on, I think the VIEW intent seems like an obvious one. Bluetooth support pr=
obably should come later if/when we put encryption/auth on the RFCOMM link =
(probably SSL).</div>
</div>

--001a11c2cba4df0a9504f39e4899--