1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
|
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <laanwj@gmail.com>) id 1V9v7L-0000Qt-OV
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 15 Aug 2013 10:49:23 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 209.85.214.53 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.214.53; envelope-from=laanwj@gmail.com;
helo=mail-bk0-f53.google.com;
Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com ([209.85.214.53])
by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1V9v7H-0007DL-LD
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 15 Aug 2013 10:49:23 +0000
Received: by mail-bk0-f53.google.com with SMTP id d7so168152bkh.26
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Thu, 15 Aug 2013 03:49:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.205.24.131 with SMTP id re3mr10323412bkb.8.1376563753226;
Thu, 15 Aug 2013 03:49:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.111.131 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 03:49:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABsx9T3DM72+8HgNWWZ2HaAgZMQGAPn87L9VVKdkbVkS7sd8Tg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABsx9T3DM72+8HgNWWZ2HaAgZMQGAPn87L9VVKdkbVkS7sd8Tg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 12:49:13 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+s+GJDr-KhPdnNEuFAE325OUEa42ukJ_9yXcS8sJ+Y_w9LWyw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Wladimir <laanwj@gmail.com>
To: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf301e2dd185c0f704e3fa39f0
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(laanwj[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1V9v7H-0007DL-LD
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Version 0.9 goals
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 10:49:23 -0000
--20cf301e2dd185c0f704e3fa39f0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 2:29 AM, Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com>wrote:
> It feels to me like we're close to a 0.9 "feature freeze" / start of
> release cycle; I'd like to talk a little bit about what we'd like to see in
> the final 0.9 release.
>
> Payment Protocol support is ready to be pulled (
> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/2539) . Unless there are major
> objections, I will pull it tomorrow (it has already gone through two rounds
> of bounty-driven QA testing, so I'm convinced it is ready).
>
No objections from me, I've already looked at the code a few times and did
some testing here and there, looks good for merging.
> I'd love for 0.9 to contain sipa's "headers first" initial block download
> optimization; I think it is a big enough improvement to justify making the
> 0.9 test/release cycle longer.
>
Yep, that'd be great.
> Coin control (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/2343).
>
> The autotools work (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/2805).
>
> Gitian-build with the latest openssl and Qt5. Perhaps update the version
> of Debian VMs that we gitian-build with.
>
Fully agreed about payment protocol, autotools and Qt5 build.
I'm still not very excited about coin control (and last time I looked at
the code, it has an issue that it introduced statefulness into the wallet
model - a bane for concurrency. But that may be resolved?) . Anyway, many
people seem to want that so it's fine with me, given that the issues are
fixed.
Wladimir
--20cf301e2dd185c0f704e3fa39f0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div><br></div>On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 2:29 AM, Gavin Andr=
esen <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:gavinandresen@gmail.com" targe=
t=3D"_blank">gavinandresen@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class=3D=
"gmail_extra">
<div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margi=
n:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr">=
It feels to me like we're close to a 0.9 "feature freeze" / s=
tart of release cycle; I'd like to talk a little bit about what we'=
d like to see in the final 0.9 release.<div>
<div><br></div><div>Payment Protocol support is ready to be pulled (<a href=
=3D"https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/2539" target=3D"_blank">https:/=
/github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/2539</a>) . Unless there are major objecti=
ons, I will pull it tomorrow (it has already gone through two rounds of bou=
nty-driven QA testing, so I'm convinced it is ready).</div>
</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>No objections from me, I'v=
e already looked at the code a few times and did some testing here and ther=
e, looks good for merging.</div><div>=C2=A0</div><blockquote class=3D"gmail=
_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:=
1ex">
<div dir=3D"ltr">
<div>I'd love for 0.9 to contain sipa's "headers first" i=
nitial block download optimization; I think it is a big enough improvement =
to justify making the 0.9 test/release cycle longer.<br></div></div></block=
quote>
<div><br></div><div>Yep, that'd be great.</div><div>=C2=A0</div><blockq=
uote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc =
solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr">
<div>Coin control (<a href=3D"https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/2343"=
target=3D"_blank">https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/2343</a>).<br></=
div><div><br></div><div>The autotools work (<a href=3D"https://github.com/b=
itcoin/bitcoin/pull/2805" target=3D"_blank">https://github.com/bitcoin/bitc=
oin/pull/2805</a>).</div>
<div><br></div><div>Gitian-build with the latest openssl and Qt5. Perhaps u=
pdate the version of Debian VMs that we gitian-build with.</div></div></blo=
ckquote><div><br></div><div>Fully agreed about payment protocol, autotools =
and Qt5 build.=C2=A0</div>
<div><br></div><div>I'm still not very excited about coin control (and =
last time I looked at the code, it has an issue that it introduced stateful=
ness into the wallet model - a bane for concurrency. But that may be resolv=
ed?) . Anyway, many people seem to want that so it's fine with me, give=
n that the issues are fixed.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Wladimir</div></div></div></div>
--20cf301e2dd185c0f704e3fa39f0--
|
