1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
|
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <etotheipi@gmail.com>) id 1YDIYA-0000do-P1
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 19 Jan 2015 20:03:50 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 209.85.216.173 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.216.173; envelope-from=etotheipi@gmail.com;
helo=mail-qc0-f173.google.com;
Received: from mail-qc0-f173.google.com ([209.85.216.173])
by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1YDIY9-0001ds-OG
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 19 Jan 2015 20:03:50 +0000
Received: by mail-qc0-f173.google.com with SMTP id m20so16753792qcx.4
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Mon, 19 Jan 2015 12:03:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.140.98.225 with SMTP id o88mr38441338qge.5.1421697824324;
Mon, 19 Jan 2015 12:03:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.28] (c-69-143-204-74.hsd1.md.comcast.net.
[69.143.204.74]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
v16sm13175987qaw.30.2015.01.19.12.03.40
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Mon, 19 Jan 2015 12:03:43 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54BD6314.60607@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 15:03:32 -0500
From: Alan Reiner <etotheipi@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64;
rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
References: <CAN5esQJe0uUm0NyctaBa6WH7_JjeE_OLR=FY_XQWnSr50VRDyA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJHLa0OTynX4oiQoyanpRKE2tpAuS4L5X-2j20328725J9RrvQ@mail.gmail.com> <2C7D6208-1921-4DDC-90FE-DB1ABE1D61DB@petertodd.org>
<CAN5esQLCV=L0kYxDGhK2F=qZ8OqMxyYS+-Pn17U_M+nV4Sj3Og@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAN5esQLCV=L0kYxDGhK2F=qZ8OqMxyYS+-Pn17U_M+nV4Sj3Og@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="------------060407000803050905050006"
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(etotheipi[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1YDIY9-0001ds-OG
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP70: why Google Protocol Buffers for
encoding?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 20:03:50 -0000
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------060407000803050905050006
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I'm a bit confused. It's been a long time since I looked at protobuf
(and will have to dig into it soon), but I seem to recall it doesn't
have any of the determinism properties you guys just said. It is
intended to allow you to skip details of the on-the-wire representations
and just send a bunch of named fields between systems. I thought there
was no guarantee that two identical protobuf structures will get
serialized identically...?
On 01/19/2015 02:57 PM, Richard Brady wrote:
> Thanks guys, great answers.
>
> The design choice certainly makes a lot more sense now regardless of
> whether one agrees with it or not.
>
> Regards,
> Richard
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.
> GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn.
> Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth.
> Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
--------------060407000803050905050006
Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
I'm a bit confused. It's been a long time since I looked at
protobuf (and will have to dig into it soon), but I seem to recall
it doesn't have any of the determinism properties you guys just
said. It is intended to allow you to skip details of the
on-the-wire representations and just send a bunch of named fields
between systems. I thought there was no guarantee that two
identical protobuf structures will get serialized identically...?<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 01/19/2015 02:57 PM, Richard Brady
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAN5esQLCV=L0kYxDGhK2F=qZ8OqMxyYS+-Pn17U_M+nV4Sj3Og@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div>
<div class="gmail_signature">Thanks guys, great answers. </div>
<div class="gmail_signature"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_signature">The design choice certainly
makes a lot more sense now regardless of whether one
agrees with it or not.</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_signature"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_signature">Regards,</div>
<div class="gmail_signature">Richard</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.
GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn.
Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth.
Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant.
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet">http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet</a></pre>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net">Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------060407000803050905050006--
|
