summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/e2/cbd020c7484102c0ae658dff12308eda3457ea
blob: 02e209f01d02bc8523256b2360b425ff45de54a2 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <chris@beams.io>) id 1WTrqf-0001ux-Vt
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sat, 29 Mar 2014 11:54:54 +0000
X-ACL-Warn: 
Received: from chello084114181075.1.15.vie.surfer.at ([84.114.181.75]
	helo=mini.local) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp 
	(Exim 4.76) id 1WTrqd-00051c-QM
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sat, 29 Mar 2014 11:54:53 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mini.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60E1D517FBE;
	Sat, 29 Mar 2014 12:54:45 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mini.local
Received: from mini.local ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (mini.local [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id iHqdmrLrluNn; Sat, 29 Mar 2014 12:54:30 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.0.14] (chello084114181075.1.15.vie.surfer.at
	[84.114.181.75]) by mini.local (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5A7E0517FA6;
	Sat, 29 Mar 2014 12:54:30 +0100 (CET)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
	boundary="Apple-Mail=_F0A02C0B-CE11-4953-89A4-1E5039BBF068";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.1 (8c620b1)
From: Chris Beams <chris@beams.io>
In-Reply-To: <1701792.nYQmSeReja@crushinator>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 12:54:27 +0100
Message-Id: <CA0DE0F6-C5B9-4BC4-9F79-D98C89A159F4@beams.io>
References: <1878927.J1e3zZmtIP@crushinator>
	<83BBF97F-290E-4CF9-B062-92445ED35F27@beams.io>
	<1701792.nYQmSeReja@crushinator>
To: Matt Whitlock <bip@mattwhitlock.name>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	1.3 RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL        RBL: Relay in RNBL,
	https://senderscore.org/blacklistlookup/
	[84.114.181.75 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com]
	0.0 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP address
	[84.114.181.75 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
X-Headers-End: 1WTrqd-00051c-QM
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Presenting a BIP for Shamir's Secret
	Sharing of Bitcoin private keys
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 11:54:54 -0000


--Apple-Mail=_F0A02C0B-CE11-4953-89A4-1E5039BBF068
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii

Enlightening; thanks, Matt. And apologies to the list for my earlier =
inadvertent double-post.

On Mar 29, 2014, at 12:16 PM, Matt Whitlock <bip@mattwhitlock.name> =
wrote:

> On Saturday, 29 March 2014, at 10:08 am, Chris Beams wrote:
>> Matt, could you expand on use cases for which you see Shamir's Secret =
Sharing Scheme as the best tool for the job? In particular, when do you =
see that it would be superior to simply going with multisig in the first =
place? Perhaps you see these as complimentary approaches, toward =
defense-in-depth? In any case, the Motivation and Rationale sections of =
the BIP in its current form are silent on these questions.
>=20
> I have added two new sections to address your questions.
>=20
> https://github.com/whitslack/btctool/blob/bip/bip-xxxx.mediawiki


--Apple-Mail=_F0A02C0B-CE11-4953-89A4-1E5039BBF068
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
	name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
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=q6Ot
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail=_F0A02C0B-CE11-4953-89A4-1E5039BBF068--