summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/e1/528caca1e7e823d9963cd40f6efedd8a56567a
blob: 1581d26a1efc17740907abe8366893a8a60c7166 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <stick@gk2.sk>) id 1WTAu6-0008Ee-KX
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Thu, 27 Mar 2014 14:03:34 +0000
X-ACL-Warn: 
Received: from mail-ee0-f49.google.com ([74.125.83.49])
	by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1WTAu5-0002Q8-5I
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Thu, 27 Mar 2014 14:03:34 +0000
Received: by mail-ee0-f49.google.com with SMTP id c41so2879976eek.22
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Thu, 27 Mar 2014 07:03:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=mZIWbp+eutnVRGQ6ZMpwSHgx8FEHjqn2s86JRNzoqMw=;
	b=Nz1SIEp/N+e4Yi5UnSRxfN5QgV1krIzT5C028H+xyPuW1k2Onn5bm6Fxw+2P52u+L7
	8RJKfkxml05C0os6Ni0pWeNJPLmo1sVpi8cllUyksgWNNgBpiKXFSLhqLkT/Ps2sxi9t
	h7LRiv/nQp/9TgkKR57GCDoXoGEhg4SQ2u4kRQ6Zvx1KukxVrvo1KiQXhd3OS2+PwMc4
	A59f14uCQW498RMrtM02mGAXRXudj/QOnkc9CJWLYXqOFcyY89WQ9VeNF7mFg6xBrqkB
	g4BXkEiyYOngD/uokF0SQhK2tNRh5C9dzAmmvyQd04opULfABZdPQ78BKAm2zv/xHdNX
	yysw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnPYPFMvOE9fBI8UvSZgyW+46x7RLWT2p/zj5bTNNLHHd7K+96V9a1U5bWLm4jAwwWy/bjJ
X-Received: by 10.14.87.7 with SMTP id x7mr1939284eee.44.1395929006732;
	Thu, 27 Mar 2014 07:03:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tetra.site (nat-0-15.lam.cz. [80.92.242.254])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id y7sm4598875eev.5.2014.03.27.07.03.24
	for <multiple recipients>
	(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Thu, 27 Mar 2014 07:03:25 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <53342FAB.6040803@gk2.sk>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 15:03:23 +0100
From: Pavol Rusnak <stick@gk2.sk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Thomas Voegtlin <thomasv1@gmx.de>, 
	Bitcoin Development <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
References: <CANEZrP2hbBVGqytmXR1rAcVama4ONnR586Se-Ch=dsxOzy2O4w@mail.gmail.com>	<53340999.807@gmx.de>	<CAJna-HhmFya+3W67qQt0wMhW=B4vJvwdkr-5WnU+KEaKq7uaUA@mail.gmail.com>	<5334144A.9040600@gmx.de>
	<53342B3E.3050404@gk2.sk> <53342D5F.7090309@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <53342D5F.7090309@gmx.de>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
X-Headers-End: 1WTAu5-0002Q8-5I
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] New BIP32 structure
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 14:03:34 -0000

On 03/27/2014 02:53 PM, Thomas Voegtlin wrote:
> Note: Maybe we could just look at the first address of each account, 
> instead of the first 10 ?

This is a possible optimization, but it adds unnecessary logic. Also it
does not decrease the number of required requests between a client and a
server (e.g. when backend sends responses in "bulks" of 10 addresses or
more).


-- 
Best Regards / S pozdravom,

Pavol Rusnak <stick@gk2.sk>