blob: 2f0ba337e28b3d1a117c213e7a31382cbe57e4eb (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
|
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <mh.in.england@gmail.com>) id 1SgDEO-0002Ge-8L
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sun, 17 Jun 2012 11:01:20 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 74.125.82.53 as permitted sender)
client-ip=74.125.82.53; envelope-from=mh.in.england@gmail.com;
helo=mail-wg0-f53.google.com;
Received: from mail-wg0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53])
by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1SgDEN-0004IX-Fi
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sun, 17 Jun 2012 11:01:20 +0000
Received: by wgbfm10 with SMTP id fm10so3874116wgb.10
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Sun, 17 Jun 2012 04:01:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.143.213 with SMTP id l63mr6547833wej.117.1339930872604;
Sun, 17 Jun 2012 04:01:12 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: mh.in.england@gmail.com
Received: by 10.216.254.232 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 04:01:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20120616192651.GA13438@vps7135.xlshosting.net>
References: <20120616192651.GA13438@vps7135.xlshosting.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 13:01:12 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 49X9qmJb5fPUtd77rfnmh-zAdf4
Message-ID: <CANEZrP0hGk63_9z3VLGGGw=VUZKC8tNorJF+2udmjZgCfDK-Tw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
To: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(mh.in.england[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1SgDEN-0004IX-Fi
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] After compressed pubkeys: hybrid pubkeys
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 11:01:20 -0000
> * 0x04 [32-byte X coord] [32-byte Y coord]: uncompressed format
> * 0x06 [32-byte X coord] [32-byte Y coord]: hybrid format for even Y coords
> * 0x07 [32-byte X coord] [32-byte Y coord]: hybrid format for odd Y coords
So what's the actual difference in format? Is there any at all, or
it's just the first number that's different?
|
