1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
|
Return-Path: <realemilengler@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7E33CDD
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 9 Jun 2019 18:56:50 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-ed1-f51.google.com (mail-ed1-f51.google.com
[209.85.208.51])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 562CB174
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 9 Jun 2019 18:56:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ed1-f51.google.com with SMTP id a14so9050340edv.12
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 09 Jun 2019 11:56:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=KigdlOC9fmeJSLYHrZXT/aarzhA4APJkCzcKvHWE90g=;
b=ms3EgmDUbc3dT496vhzwkGT/jTC51RnMVbUse9v0ifEoMkKZA9SznvkQByt5Ad7dDC
w++8aGu/7HagJsMXTpdx87j1Z3E4HGJMjmV/0q9DOu1KpiD+PHuo8dC0KwPLHem1oHMs
Jq4ctnPcbe683vJ8aBXNLRkq3g9FlB7pUfpJ4WtKsrsPqmsdg/HcAr2hR9A6UCzz2igG
kBh7EE9D7pr0beOOcKDiqIG9cfzAzyf8slIq1XUx9vlafJc7nHJeSSEoBY5dnwAHg9SS
ui+39Yla90NAZKVD9Z92Vcy3kQHXSEJcSFeDWg+XZSNqlLK4GmuxotRruWIGPOQjXWRQ
8X0w==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWahNO5w/6Ja1lYiSl6XL5Gn/AFGzdlxWxXLe/f969IqNadzobx
WeN0Lm75vkVy35RjltczOmvD4X7D
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwyLp3VJguyZr0MUonOeF2Co9Eq1aV2z6sftpnn59tkN/4Vc3wyuFapoANIIP/Uwn/mmFHBOA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:58cf:: with SMTP id
e15mr6414338ejs.240.1560106608741;
Sun, 09 Jun 2019 11:56:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2a02:8108:8240:4e4c:527d:c7f:2174:340b?
([2a02:8108:8240:4e4c:527d:c7f:2174:340b])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
h22sm2272676edr.56.2019.06.09.11.56.48
(version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Sun, 09 Jun 2019 11:56:48 -0700 (PDT)
To: Tim Menapace <tim_jannik@gmx.de>, bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
References: <mailman.1827.1560068363.7313.bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
<F1FD5AC3-12F0-4087-8AB6-D7DCF7799FF4@gmx.de>
From: Emil Engler <me@emilengler.com>
Message-ID: <d56dfe90-4977-def6-e35b-81bbbdb5c1da@emilengler.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2019 20:56:47 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/60.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <F1FD5AC3-12F0-4087-8AB6-D7DCF7799FF4@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 09 Jun 2019 21:17:52 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] bitcoin-dev Digest, Vol 49, Issue 8
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2019 18:56:51 -0000
But using the testnet means that you actually need to deal with resets.
There were 2 resets in the past but the last was in 2011.
Am 09.06.19 um 16:55 schrieb Tim Menapace:
> >I don't get why the testnet shouldn't be >resetted just because there is
> >a (probably better) alternative for it. The >testnet is still a thing and
> >is also used.
>
> Like Bryan said, lot of miners test here. E.g. new firmware versions,
> hardware prototypes and operation services. Difficulty will be on
> current levels in a short period of time.
|
