1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
|
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <pete@petertodd.org>) id 1VZ51s-0006jQ-Ix
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 23 Oct 2013 20:27:44 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of petertodd.org
designates 62.13.149.113 as permitted sender)
client-ip=62.13.149.113; envelope-from=pete@petertodd.org;
helo=outmail149113.authsmtp.com;
Received: from outmail149113.authsmtp.com ([62.13.149.113])
by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
id 1VZ51r-00074u-L0 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 23 Oct 2013 20:27:44 +0000
Received: from mail-c235.authsmtp.com (mail-c235.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.235])
by punt5.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id r9NKRZq8095079;
Wed, 23 Oct 2013 21:27:35 +0100 (BST)
Received: from petertodd.org (petertodd.org [174.129.28.249])
(authenticated bits=128)
by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id r9NKRVxO042782
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
Wed, 23 Oct 2013 21:27:34 +0100 (BST)
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 16:27:31 -0400
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@250bpm.com>
Message-ID: <20131023202731.GA31783@petertodd.org>
References: <791a727f-2188-4848-bd77-ea733c8c5c2c@me.com>
<201310211947.59640.luke@dashjr.org> <52661DB7.7040805@250bpm.com>
<FAE2A544-9295-4087-96DE-D4602D109CBD@me.com>
<CAAS2fgS2f=gYRSr1n2DzK7CUH3xG3J2JMnDreCKBoCcJcpGLxg@mail.gmail.com>
<52662AA1.5050509@250bpm.com>
<CAJHLa0NDus+Ou5go8b_OHvjYW8f7oxXbpxnHTG3dcvxGR49nxA@mail.gmail.com>
<52677CF7.9070609@250bpm.com>
<20131023194039.GB31497@petertodd.org> <52682C24.30700@250bpm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <52682C24.30700@250bpm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Server-Quench: 8cf9f386-3c21-11e3-b802-002590a15da7
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
aQdMdAEUF1YAAgsB AmUbWVVeUlp7Wmc7 ag1VcwRfa1RMVxto
VEFWR1pVCwQmQxV/ fXx4GmZycwdBcHw+ ZEZnXXYVVBcsfBB+
SkhJFj4EZHphaTUc TRJQdwFJcANIexZF O1F6ACIKLwdSbGoL
NQ4vNDcwO3BTJTpY RgYVKF8UXXNDJDMi RgsDATQpEgUZRyh7
BT0eERYEBkEaP14p dRMoEUoCNAcVEQRa dwAA
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1023:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 174.129.28.249/587
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
for more information. [URIs: petertodd.org]
X-Headers-End: 1VZ51r-00074u-L0
Cc: Bitcoin Development <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Revisiting the BIPS process, a proposal
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 20:27:44 -0000
--HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:05:56PM +0200, Martin Sustrik wrote:
> On 23/10/13 21:40, Peter Todd wrote:
>=20
> >The reference implementation is the specification - the "specification"
> >on the wiki is best thought of as a set of Coles Notes on the real
> >specification. If you don't already understand that and the nuance of
> >that statement you should assume the protocol is fixed in stone and
> >doesn't evolve at all; that statement is not quite true, but it's very
> >close to the truth.
>=20
> Does that imply that the notes are deliberately obscured to force
> everyone to check the source code?
What's on the wiki is mostly the work of people who aren't working on
the reference implementation, so no, you can't say that.
--=20
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
0000000000000003c1d48b638b9857cb56b6fe9188a60c481fbc9b738ccb4663
--HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJSaDEzAAoJEBmcgzuo5/CFEUgH/3ba8xgBR8cqRW21T2084OBu
wupu5pPZBIGT2KfuoJDjRYyXngUitMIxtJbL52srt85EzJd4JpLEL5OI9T2Kg9Xm
0nLRpNy9xPHL7N6hpcBvLoxlPi04mx5M7lFYaBrZVOHd3+XdunUSVB/Dmj+bX6pO
uBaW6RdprSfD4tEf3h2TohSRPfsxXRf4jW+u8K6t5RUM0ofnk6X9zBRcPLl2p3Vx
ac4sg9FksjMNLMca4YylmwoRo00DZaRpRhtP53+xSB1lwJE/aJtYRTjwEbMs8XKN
IDYUjacDNroduKbBn9ilHByYBvtvqKUon8mb88oJyXRvXPrLnUZmTiCegCT/Or8=
=sP8l
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD--
|
