1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
|
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <rdwnj@yahoo.com>) id 1VCrQG-0006c4-PR
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Fri, 23 Aug 2013 13:29:04 +0000
X-ACL-Warn:
Received: from nm26-vm5.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([98.138.91.248])
by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.76) id 1VCrQF-0007nX-Ok
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Fri, 23 Aug 2013 13:29:04 +0000
Received: from [98.138.226.180] by nm26.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
23 Aug 2013 13:28:58 -0000
Received: from [98.138.226.163] by tm15.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
23 Aug 2013 13:28:58 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1064.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
23 Aug 2013 13:28:58 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 513968.78207.bm@omp1064.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 94909 invoked by uid 60001); 23 Aug 2013 13:28:58 -0000
X-YMail-OSG: 7HdzpZIVM1klPiQdWv1wif1xnoJJQdZkhkLksyINXn9yRHK
uMAV4ni8oMrbshlg.rODXV0sRnPRi4JVeRB3iwEUkH5B6G.xlcqp2UGG7UAs
h3HL9M67YCE1reYm72RKic6cRz6JTvnOcwBSfDzEKlW2vSOV.cc5yQfdQatn
yaSl6gkmy.8OHwQj3dA0lV3ozdz._KhZWZVJYr4TEOjVQ9N2qqSIXpSYb.50
EkPIuaL6uNTYLm_I32WPDIa59AnwTydWDqPQxeVdm0Qm8t4tnsHi5G7QxPHQ
U_zKJxlTtPUeTr6YIQtvth3K34dDMcdcMa48nuTqF9BCjky99pNfeYhRToV7
Wgf1MZmmFJ8rLn9LVsrh3ToPPLvbVCrn0iZj9ELIgJP7uMSpqDm1taUKKZEV
_Q6BUnwWolvkD3_rZxzBvomRzuIj6keJqJpnNprrfzXnVVnuBQxuuxWFgoaI
B.DtSNeic6QWECKdBtfwLdDuyasWtVy7uU6y6dGAod_TEMSiwZG5.Uxqntxz
9r8NVBImvCzMfjIFadKTKefjAwVg3bPmgnsUbI5VvCqZKgGFeRBbo1RMMz0k
Z4MR.lCgABRGflXebJOWxBbFGhfJSqvlcVdrglQ6GG.2IXCkdQUquGXr8eEK
Eib4rAJkeo_w9zyiFIhaY6tIwmY.TML8RU0cxFDEWy912q.ZRaJdP4II_KP6
T0ZYgTznvfqg7W7LK3nVSyoXONjvTzN8lPk_IrFsNWjVOQPPwPN3L
Received: from [69.126.245.209] by web124501.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP;
Fri, 23 Aug 2013 06:28:58 PDT
X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001,
CgoKCl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fCk1lc3NhZ2U6IDYKRGF0ZTogVGh1LCAyMiBBdWcgMjAxMyAxNzozMDoxMyArMDIwMApGcm9tOiBXbGFkaW1pciA8bGFhbndqQGdtYWlsLmNvbT4KU3ViamVjdDogUmU6IFtCaXRjb2luLWRldmVsb3BtZW50XSBQcm9wb3NhbDogcmVtb3ZlICJnZXR3b3JrIiBSUEMgZnJvbQrCoMKgwqAgYml0Y29pbmQKCk1lc3NhZ2UtSUQ6CsKgwqDCoCA8Q0ErcytHSkM0bzVWNXArRlkrYmdXVlV0NXVtZWJuNF8zN2JUaWhmWDJxMUdGMDVTPVZBQG1haWwuZ21haWwBMAEBAQE-
X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.155.576
References: <mailman.173353.1377185424.12996.bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <1377264538.81477.YahooMailNeo@web124501.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 06:28:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ron <rdwnj@yahoo.com>
To: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net"
<bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
In-Reply-To: <mailman.173353.1377185424.12996.bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="1477594544-920541368-1377264538=:81477"
X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
no trust [98.138.91.248 listed in list.dnswl.org]
0.0 HK_RANDOM_FROM From username looks random
0.6 HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM Envelope sender username looks random
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(rdwnj[at]yahoo.com)
-2.8 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
domain 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1VCrQF-0007nX-Ok
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin-development Digest, Vol 27,
Issue 33
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Ron <rdwnj@yahoo.com>
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 13:29:05 -0000
--1477594544-920541368-1377264538=:81477
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
=0A=0A=0A=0A________________________________=0AMessage: 6=0ADate: Thu, 22 A=
ug 2013 17:30:13 +0200=0AFrom: Wladimir <laanwj@gmail.com>=0ASubject: Re: [=
Bitcoin-development] Proposal: remove "getwork" RPC from=0A=A0=A0=A0 bitcoi=
nd=0A=0AMessage-ID:=0A=A0=A0=A0 <CA+s+GJC4o5V5p+FY+bgWVUt5umebn4_37bTihfX2q=
1GF05S=3DVA@mail.gmail.com>=0AContent-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"utf-8"=
=0A=0AOn Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net> wrote:=
=0A=0A> That would be annoying for testing. Regtest mode allows you to crea=
te a=0A> new block by just running "setgenerate true" (it switches itself o=
ff after=0A> creating a block). If you had to set up a complicated set of s=
eparate=0A> programs just to do regtest mode that'd be a step backwards, IM=
O.=0A>=0A=0AThere is some consensus that when the internal miner is to be r=
emoved, a=0Asimple miner should be packaged with the main repository as sep=
arate=0Aprogram (the "reference miner"?). The only change is that it does n=
o longer=0Aneed to burden the core code=0A(see also the discussion here: ht=
tps://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/2917).=0A=0A=0AWladimir=0A___________=
_______________________________________________=0AI see no burden to the co=
de when it is not mining, if that is what you mean by=0Aburden. The miner c=
ode's hashes/sec are a function of how much CPU time it =0Agets. When I am =
gcc compiling, I see the hashes/sec drop, but bitcoind keeps =0Aup easily s=
ide by side with http://blockchain.info/ latest transactions and =0Anew blo=
cks. And I only have a single core AMD Athlon 1.8GHz cpu.=0A=0AI would hate=
to admit how many browser windows and tabs I have open too,=0Aand an IDE (=
LOL)!I will admit that I have modified the miner code a little, =0A=A0to us=
e (potentially) every allowable nonce and to check for a new block =0Ain a =
timed fashion and be less aggressive, 8 bytes of 0 instead of 4, in checkin=
g =0Afor a potential solution. =0A=0ARon
--1477594544-920541368-1377264538=:81477
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html><body><div style=3D"color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:ti=
mes new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><div><span><br></span=
></div><div><br></div> <div style=3D"font-family: times new roman, new yor=
k, times, serif; font-size: 12pt;"> <div style=3D"font-family: times new ro=
man, new york, times, serif; font-size: 12pt;"> <div class=3D"y_msg_contain=
er"> <hr size=3D"1"><font face=3D"Arial" size=3D"2"><b><span style=3D"font-=
weight:bold;"></span></b></font>Message: 6<br>Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 17:30:=
13 +0200<br>From: Wladimir <<a ymailto=3D"mailto:laanwj@gmail.com" href=
=3D"mailto:laanwj@gmail.com">laanwj@gmail.com</a>><br>Subject: Re: [Bitc=
oin-development] Proposal: remove "getwork" RPC from<br> =
bitcoind<br><br>Message-ID:<br> <CA+s+GJC4o5V5p+FY+bgW=
VUt5umebn4_37bTihfX2q1GF05S=3D<a ymailto=3D"mailto:VA@mail.gmail.com" href=
=3D"mailto:VA@mail.gmail.com">VA@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>Content-Type: te=
xt/plain;
charset=3D"utf-8"<br><br>On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Mike Hearn <<=
a ymailto=3D"mailto:mike@plan99.net" href=3D"mailto:mike@plan99.net">mike@p=
lan99.net</a>> wrote:<br><br>> That would be annoying for testing. Re=
gtest mode allows you to create a<br>> new block by just running "setgen=
erate true" (it switches itself off after<br>> creating a block). If you=
had to set up a complicated set of separate<br>> programs just to do re=
gtest mode that'd be a step backwards, IMO.<br>><br><br>There is some co=
nsensus that when the internal miner is to be removed, a<br>simple miner sh=
ould be packaged with the main repository as separate<br>program (the "refe=
rence miner"?). The only change is that it does no longer<br>need to burden=
the core code<br>(see also the discussion here: <a href=3D"https://github.=
com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/2917"
target=3D"_blank">https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/2917</a>).<br><b=
r><br>Wladimir<br>_________________________________________________________=
_<br>I see no burden to the code when it is not mining, if that is what you=
mean by<br>burden. The miner code's hashes/sec are a function of how much =
CPU time it <br>gets. When I am gcc compiling, I see the hashes/sec drop, b=
ut bitcoind keeps <br>up easily side by side with http://blockchain.info/ l=
atest transactions and <br>new blocks. And I only have a single core AMD At=
hlon 1.8GHz cpu.<br><br>I would hate to admit how many browser windows and =
tabs I have open too, <br>and an IDE (LOL)! I will admit that I have modifi=
ed the miner code a little, <br> to use (potentially) every allowable =
nonce and to check for a new block <br>in a timed fashion and be less aggre=
ssive, 8 bytes of 0 instead of 4, in checking <br>for a potential solution.=
<br><br>Ron<br><br></div> </div> </div> </div></body></html>
--1477594544-920541368-1377264538=:81477--
|
