summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/db/56142e82445c68dd79d3460459b6e07be28836
blob: 14679cea40dfffc92083ff3222fc2adc00928eb3 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
Return-Path: <tomh@thinlink.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 774C11CD6
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Wed, 30 Sep 2015 23:42:16 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-ob0-f177.google.com (mail-ob0-f177.google.com
	[209.85.214.177])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01F951AF
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Wed, 30 Sep 2015 23:42:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by obbzf10 with SMTP id zf10so44823814obb.2
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Wed, 30 Sep 2015 16:42:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=7bwNXiV/vVtDn/LqIdlzdbp4na88IdQXjTGJI5blAbw=;
	b=UzN8vU5MgJlnjjwANPituMRg4zg5lfIub91gOBC7OcVjTumkXIddrw/obEcVW4eg8G
	TLpLUgffDJimAuF7cQj3U9NSFTwzC9I0raxsgvb4EW+cwV1ew9Wc/a2/fvbD+h3GGU2o
	5o829F7nTcj5i0+dcZKxlC0G2lZSmcG/XHgUXjOwPxYYeS7h6jeSdqw0WyKR4JHA0vf8
	SN5DmcCiTZYWqoxCyZG3ips4b1xer6VBv8S6uNSYF9Ij3bKHmVn2mKTtWCLJtdyYsK3E
	l4atierfiwYL+gA/HEvN7tZ3sh3JTaeKgr9HTsLa4ddF6111bXGkkp2mPKvi+MOnsi8Z
	iQsw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnMxJqOnSnn8t+ROEnB0e8uBWhPrNXwopTN+pOqO62ih4NR4k8/AZ41eynqFx39Q1BlAbvW
X-Received: by 10.60.177.129 with SMTP id cq1mr4071686oec.42.1443656535211;
	Wed, 30 Sep 2015 16:42:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.100.1.239] ([204.58.254.99])
	by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id
	xa6sm1350648oeb.15.2015.09.30.16.42.14
	(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
	Wed, 30 Sep 2015 16:42:14 -0700 (PDT)
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
References: <87mvwqb132.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <5602F075.4000102@thinlink.com>
	<8737xwhdac.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
From: Tom Harding <tomh@thinlink.com>
Message-ID: <560C733F.3080608@thinlink.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 16:41:51 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8737xwhdac.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
	RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [BIP Proposal] Version bits with timeout and
	delay.
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 23:42:16 -0000

On 9/29/2015 7:05 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Tom Harding via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
> writes:
>> With a simple delay, you can have the embarrassing situation where
>> support falls off during the delay period and there is far below
>> threshold support just moments prior to enforcement, but enforcement
>> happens anyway.
> Yeah, but Gavin's right.  If you can't account for all the corner cases,
> all you can do is keep it simple and well defined.
>

At least you changed the BIP to make it possible to see a fall off in 
support, even though nothing is done about it.