1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
|
Return-Path: <karljohan-alm@garage.co.jp>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88C7A5A7
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 23 May 2017 06:30:29 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mo.garage.hdemail.jp (mo.garage.hdemail.jp [46.51.242.127])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1608AD
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 23 May 2017 06:30:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ip-10-217-1-36.ap-northeast-1.compute.internal
(localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by mo.garage.hdemail.jp (hde-mf-postfix) with SMTP id 482F114C0BD
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 23 May 2017 15:30:26 +0900 (JST)
(envelope-from karljohan-alm@garage.co.jp)
X-Received: from unknown (HELO mo.garage.hdemail.jp) (127.0.0.1)
by 0 with SMTP; 23 May 2017 15:30:26 +0900
X-Received: from mo.garage.hdemail.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by mo.garage.hdemail.jp (hde-ma-postfix) with ESMTP id 2DA664C087
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 23 May 2017 15:30:26 +0900 (JST)
(envelope-from karljohan-alm@garage.co.jp)
Received: from gw25.oz.hdemail.jp
(ip-10-174-0-130.ap-northeast-1.compute.internal [10.174.0.130])
by mo.garage.hdemail.jp (hde-mf-postfix) with ESMTP id 2879714C0C1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 23 May 2017 15:30:26 +0900 (JST)
(envelope-from karljohan-alm@garage.co.jp)
X-Durian-MailFrom: karljohan-alm@garage.co.jp
X-Durian-RcptTo: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Received: from gw25.oz.hdemail.jp (gw25.oz.hdemail.jp [127.0.0.1])
by gw25.oz.hdemail.jp (gw25.oz.hdemail.jp [127.0.0.1]);
Tue, 23 May 2017 15:30:24 +0900
X-Received: from mail-qk0-f198.google.com (lb1.oz.lo.hdemail.jp
[54.248.222.53])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by gw25.oz.hdemail.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92BD5148C13D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 23 May 2017 15:30:23 +0900 (JST)
X-Received: by mail-qk0-f198.google.com with SMTP id 23so60662241qks.12
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 22 May 2017 23:30:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=0xS5G41+UWSQ5jFInkF1lvbOhS3Y9mtKPQkYUsiZ1pk=;
b=ukksi5WsO754o9qwpOgWgYT8ps9P15uXhOhvEGyDZ+6oswg9PbRKtZJwYV3cHWqZ2t
V9kLwhYH/dQxOhSKo0quRnihLXp4EcOd27CY+/d/67XaTkFHLdz+ylb6P2H7LzlGmzgT
yAWFu2/A0/uXRoGnKeNlRXkod9WAq/FR/mSWYCTdlCJbxOiNJjTiOD5BfAPH6538W6pG
ESqv+0XinmsbcoT8DEsyxfbziUjjW/1wCSQBQKKM85UbrbUJrB1FZKzNiN2iRo3iMbeF
hSOcaomBCKgV3+aNc1fqDHwA9a+iA89F4dRnTk6i3PAx8eYX5KnUPx8l4r3+oQZcGbdc
jfqg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcC7vYFJVDPAkMBvIPKV+g0CM49D0tPHP40T492Yc1mtOt0+1S5g
xmK0oMBJMkxxc/mKBsX2Nxi2+FeM1YxGKakcsdk1ISEOVFxREh1jolXg00HiVtoykiKx1n6B+5U
TUhXZdCB4n6+jFLfqVT0KYlA2GhakmJb5/iz6sIXqbA0GNA==
X-Received: by 10.200.55.29 with SMTP id o29mr26040211qtb.120.1495521021660;
Mon, 22 May 2017 23:30:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.200.55.29 with SMTP id o29mr26040196qtb.120.1495521021515;
Mon, 22 May 2017 23:30:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.12.137.38 with HTTP; Mon, 22 May 2017 23:30:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAAjy6kC43DX3wpaZ+3skBUO8hVrYt7uNZfw1Ep3GDJs8YA9Gxg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAS2fgRdSOu8N6L3+fBpnye+rM+W6+F=cePy=9oL4tJuCj=Jsw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAFp6fsGcKip_R7OH217mXBQ8OK9N_3Ea-1HtRin3EtwzvJaBhQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAjy6kC43DX3wpaZ+3skBUO8hVrYt7uNZfw1Ep3GDJs8YA9Gxg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Karl Johan Alm <karljohan-alm@garage.co.jp>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 15:30:01 +0900
Message-ID: <CALJw2w54A_SL-p4iUX_bE3CJidPxNhb09On9XfUAYxmpV8ekpQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Steven Pine <steven.pine@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 23 May 2017 12:03:05 +0000
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] I do not support the BIP 148 UASF
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 06:30:29 -0000
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Steven Pine via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Correct me if I am wrong, but currently core developers are arguing over
> whether or not to allow an optional configuration switch which defaults off
> but signals and enforces BIP148 when used. Who are we protecting users from,
> themselves? Are you protecting core? from what? I am somewhat genuinely
> befuddled by those who can't even allow a user config switch to be set.
Essentially, if we make a potentially very harmful option easy to
enable for users, we are putting them at risk, so yes, this is about
protecting users of the base Bitcoin Core implementation. Users have,
hopefully, come to appreciate this implementation for the peer
review-based strict development process, and making a hasty decision
due to time constraints (segwit activation expiration) may have
undesirable consequences. Opinions among the regular contributors are
split on the matter, which to me is an indication we should be
cautious and consider all aspects before making a decision on the
matter.
|
