1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
|
Return-Path: <1240902@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 718D88A7
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 25 Aug 2015 21:44:47 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-io0-f177.google.com (mail-io0-f177.google.com
[209.85.223.177])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07E8C1B7
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 25 Aug 2015 21:44:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by iodb91 with SMTP id b91so203231081iod.1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 25 Aug 2015 14:44:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=92Idw/BBTEAdJOfnzg1mO432a1/FIUR8/5fTofjB0j0=;
b=gq36m1OajvXBJ7YVYxGNl/KRfCqcTRqqh4s6q/s6hz3+1HquQWJ8NQewxwu8Iw6+54
JpOPsCsi7VwF75j5qvuIYCzwZ6kkGqMoPD3OqwWUJSxmlWo0iobGC6fdfJtRESxzOU7g
S1wSn8AyJOeWK2zQKGIAzs7WZSaBF4X9daPOvzHKdKFUET/Mgo2eGu/RSOoQbdgCP25E
BfWijZTWljkUKykyHqaMsXOicGD1jxeFyGUPFaD73RLHkfsgeEafSIJIHSXE7P1G/FQu
5huewDPAw+evfGSbxmr7cvKtoNtJKJ+Q9DbPV+Tkq73gBSW6EWctwcaWuJ9wF1zDa6Vx
LWPw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.129.87 with SMTP id c84mr32227987iod.4.1440539086499;
Tue, 25 Aug 2015 14:44:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.107.10.159 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Aug 2015 14:44:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <55DCDB98.80004@bitcartel.com>
References: <CAED3CWipF8u5g3LUrqfyHxvEk4Lu+d12ZOJZnoBUw6iZZOg-ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAFzgq-x9GBbqARyhMgfSPc=wYeBgzXy4VUQ0D76GC+TCAxWDuA@mail.gmail.com>
<20150825201643.GC11083@muck> <1489961.GhSFCGzPRJ@crushinator>
<20150825203744.GB3464@muck> <55DCDB98.80004@bitcartel.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 05:44:46 +0800
Message-ID: <CAFzgq-zwkJ2QnnpFsf6X7L00k=+b4s--1POq_=T7j=v-+e1FTg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Chun Wang <1240902@gmail.com>
To: Simon Liu <simon@bitcartel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org, greg@xiph.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Dynamically Controlled Bitcoin Block Size Max Cap
[BIP 1xx - Draft]
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 21:44:47 -0000
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 5:18 AM, Simon Liu via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> I don't think this would work.
>
> If the rule is that one user can only have one vote, how do you prevent
> a user running multiple nodes?
The vote is not counted by nodes, but bitcoin amount, or probably
better, coin-days. It works like proof-of-stake. A mix of
proof-of-work and proof-of-stake is good.
|
