summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/d7/fc855f7f7e7ea5f3a7a694cee6ef083b9266ab
blob: d8f3e6be65ab892e551503a0a9d00f24bfc1903c (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <gmaxwell@gmail.com>) id 1SoEVd-0002RQ-4t
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Mon, 09 Jul 2012 14:00:17 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.160.47 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.160.47; envelope-from=gmaxwell@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-pb0-f47.google.com; 
Received: from mail-pb0-f47.google.com ([209.85.160.47])
	by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1SoEVZ-0006zE-H4
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Mon, 09 Jul 2012 14:00:17 +0000
Received: by pbbrq2 with SMTP id rq2so18221950pbb.34
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Mon, 09 Jul 2012 07:00:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.232.103 with SMTP id tn7mr59076695pbc.86.1341842407582;
	Mon, 09 Jul 2012 07:00:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.59.6 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 07:00:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1341825681.35206.YahooMailNeo@web121001.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
References: <1341825681.35206.YahooMailNeo@web121001.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 10:00:07 -0400
Message-ID: <CAAS2fgRZJW02_76G-vjV8V7kDy5WoxN1Ftd4baeBjyYVBcgJiA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
To: Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(gmaxwell[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
	0.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Headers-End: 1SoEVZ-0006zE-H4
Cc: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net"
	<bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin Wallet for Android
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 14:00:17 -0000

On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 5:21 AM, Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I just saw this added to the clients page. One of the conditions we set f=
or that page was that all the clients must have the entire sourcecode avail=
able for review, and users should be able to run it from the sourcecode. Is=
 the sourcecode for this client available for review? I couldn't find it.

I've reverted these additions to the page, nothing personal but=E2=80=94

At the moment I'm strongly opposed to including any non-reviewable
client options (including centrally operated web services) on the
page, and I think this need to be discussed along with establishing
requirements.