1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
|
Return-Path: <tomas@tomasvdw.nl>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D9DB1087
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 30 Dec 2015 16:35:19 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com
[66.111.4.28])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D105A174
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 30 Dec 2015 16:35:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45])
by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 035B020701
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 30 Dec 2015 11:35:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from web4 ([10.202.2.214])
by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 30 Dec 2015 11:35:18 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type
:date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-sasl-enc
:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=/s4VHndwxiNL+OpkHOZ2Ntf6ATE=; b=cz4vg
8+x4/bmFT/VG5XWN4m7+UA8Ggf8QCfHW9NrDjQgJeHERLNAhGe/s6TyMV19MAE/Q
MdXihAb4l503fZ1e6pLU66Q3stCvEfTW1pmChFMC0P6wpBAium3ZDYd0RvfG1n5o
xoLkceQ/ICXWEosYmt6AaYepLRwmyW3R1g9nqo=
Received: by web4.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99)
id CDAA61041D9; Wed, 30 Dec 2015 11:35:17 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <1451493317.3215816.479282618.4F666D71@webmail.messagingengine.com>
X-Sasl-Enc: HuFdSK/BIf6kw7/zcfYwEJ6WLhxdXKeJCdXWi6Q+zB1v 1451493317
From: Tomas <tomas@tomasvdw.nl>
To: "" <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-a93c17cb
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 17:35:17 +0100
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 16:59:14 +0000
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] [BIP Draft] Decentralized Improvement Proposals
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 16:35:19 -0000
In an attempt to reduce developer centralization, and to reduce the risk
of forks introduced by implementation other than bitcoin-core, I have
drafted a BIP to support changes to the protocol from different
implementations.
The BIP can be found at:
https://github.com/tomasvdw/bips/blob/master/decentralized-improvement-proposals.mediawiki
I believe this BIP could mitigate the risk of forks, and decentralize
the development of the protocol.
If you consider the proposal worthy of discussion, please assign a
BIP-number.
Regards,
Tomas van der Wansem
|
