summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/d6/a0134f507fec0ab12478eedd9c6f8d9c55362c
blob: 21b507d07a752917d39e808900cbc4a9620ea8bb (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <bgroff@lavabit.com>) id 1QZUI3-00019Z-2y
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 22 Jun 2011 20:44:47 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of lavabit.com
	designates 72.249.41.33 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=72.249.41.33; envelope-from=bgroff@lavabit.com;
	helo=karen.lavabit.com; 
Received: from karen.lavabit.com ([72.249.41.33])
	by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	id 1QZUI2-0007qe-77 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 22 Jun 2011 20:44:46 +0000
Received: from a.earth.lavabit.com (a.earth.lavabit.com [192.168.111.10])
	by karen.lavabit.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7604711BB4C;
	Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:44:40 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from lavabit.com (raidz.torservers.net [46.19.138.242])
	by lavabit.com with ESMTP id BKK3H9FHOM1V;
	Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:44:38 -0500
Received: from 46.19.138.242 (SquirrelMail authenticated user bgroff)
	by lavabit.com with HTTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:44:38 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <11814.46.19.138.242.1308775478.squirrel@lavabit.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikP-VheXQyXikH6jvaqnWfH_cNjnw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <18440.87.106.138.84.1308200020.squirrel@lavabit.com>
	<BANLkTi=FTLnU-riNVYssnR9FLdcEeZX7gOS6Zdv1f_XDcJoSSg@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTikkBoHBr8z6Uv7oGU_KuT0bvgx3HA@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTinUbJ6CKczHiyX2esMyRWgUrJ_9ASeOqZbRj+23GZgjcQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTikP-VheXQyXikH6jvaqnWfH_cNjnw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:44:38 -0400 (EDT)
From: bgroff@lavabit.com
To: "Gavin Andresen" <gavinandresen@gmail.com>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.13
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	-0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
	domain
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
X-Headers-End: 1QZUI2-0007qe-77
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] [PULL] Add scriptPubKey enforced
 sendescrow and redeemescrow API calls
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 20:44:47 -0000

Gavin wrote:

> It would be spiffy to publish a new type of bitcoin address that is an
> "m of n address", that anybody could pay into, but would require m of
> n signatures to spend.  Publishing a really really long address with
> all n public keys would work.

Here's a strawman use-case for a browser centric flow for a 2-of-3 scenar=
io.

Funding:

* User is on Merchant site on the checkout page
* User selects a transaction Observer (I'm trying to get away from using
the word escrow, because the funds are not held by the third party)
* Merchant redirects to the Observer, passing in the Merchant's payout
address
* The User enters User's address
* Observer presents multisign address
"2,merchant-addr,user-addr,observer-addr" and terms and conditions - i.e.
under what circumstances the Observer will sign
* User copy/pastes the multisign address to their bitcoin client and send=
s
funds
* After some blocks go by, merchant ships

Redemption:

* Merchant reminds User to release funds
* User creates a partial tx paying out to merchant-addr and emails or
copy-pastes to Merchant
* Merchant signs and publishes the tx

Funding requires two pastes and redemption requires one.  A browser
plug-in would reduce the User effort to a couple of confirmatory clicks -
"do you want to send X BTC to Merchant Y with Observer Z?" and "do you
want to release X BTC to Merchant Y?".

--
Bobby Groff