summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/d6/8edb025e43d4966c48f093c3381c1485b0fa03
blob: 5a3e15b84c917588ee03690b2c330d5ec5f27a82 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
Return-Path: <djpnewton@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C9ADC43
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue, 13 Oct 2015 19:38:37 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-yk0-f181.google.com (mail-yk0-f181.google.com
	[209.85.160.181])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CF481C5
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue, 13 Oct 2015 19:38:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ykey125 with SMTP id y125so27347376yke.3
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue, 13 Oct 2015 12:38:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
	:cc:content-type;
	bh=uylumvMruDrxWlbfAsEPh+JkAbTM8aenZzMcl1AaHsk=;
	b=ci38G3eQ+IHUdhi5eScDS3XnIlRozllIiXMtzt4OMpT29fbgjob4RloPPIVIQHbp5N
	HcK2NpPCxzc5qqJHxB+urdwg0s4/phcC1tJAtB+/qipR2d8sM66D6OCI2gSJ4xsBpvlj
	+aQpBPT5ZgKSx6IYgLyi51knzx8UMhlaRb+ZHNVW8B8fzTTargzUE4BftMFj6CgxH5fv
	cIV65YgnqfyWn8WMoPRSS+5LivDpoWT8RZrUQd/lqTmjbJwoz5Mf/dPgwH1j8K4AQePz
	ymhcoigmDJ92D+xNIspMXlaiuL6XrG0iHrzflx21zGpW1NZOkkFHHEGZaEfmcXZjtg7f
	Rltg==
X-Received: by 10.13.213.209 with SMTP id x200mr13084164ywd.57.1444765116281; 
	Tue, 13 Oct 2015 12:38:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.129.45.66 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 12:37:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAOoPuRasL-fmQJMfmF-JVyogdMy0EVKfhUAmT44DxQq--XCdKQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOoPuRasL-fmQJMfmF-JVyogdMy0EVKfhUAmT44DxQq--XCdKQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Daniel Newton <djpnewton@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 08:37:56 +1300
Message-ID: <CAOUBo+9D7LQ-S6Rown_sbxxb9366cQj0c0HcU72B=4sBmmS0rg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Benjamin <benjamin.l.cordes@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114fb0428a4e7f05220197f7
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Liquid
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 19:38:37 -0000

--001a114fb0428a4e7f05220197f7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

>Again =E2=80=93 what does Bitcoin have to do with =E2=80=9Cmarket liquidit=
y=E2=80=9D and =E2=80=9Ccapital
requirements=E2=80=9D?

You seem to be conflating bitcoin with blockstream/liquid. Your question
does not make sense.

>Does Blockstream have commercial products now?

Yes. I am sure that was always their plan in order to stay a viable
commercial entity

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 3:25 AM, Benjamin via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> I was very surprised to learn that Blockstream will implement Sidechains
> for exchanges [1], [2] and has been working on this privately. Can somebo=
dy
> explain this =E2=80=9Cannouncement=E2=80=9D? Just a few comments on this =
=E2=80=9Cproposal=E2=80=9D.
>
> =E2=80=9CThis new construction establishes a security profile inherently =
superior
> to existing methods of rapid transfer and settlement, and is directly
> applicable to other problems within existing financial institutions.=E2=
=80=9D
>
> First of all, what does Bitcoin have to do with existing financial
> institutions? Secondly, what in do you mean by =E2=80=9Crapid transfer=E2=
=80=9D and
> "settlement"? Bitcoin is anonymous, digital cash. There is no such thing =
as
> settlement, there is only the transfer of digital cash and that's it
> (settlement is a bad word for this kind of transfer of property). If you
> make up new terms define them accurately and don't play the
> crypto-buzzword-bingo game.
>
> =E2=80=9CThis, in addition to increasing the security of funds normally s=
ubject to
> explicit counterparty risk, fosters conditions that increase market
> liquidity and reduce capital requirements for on-blockchain business
> models.=E2=80=9D
>
> Again =E2=80=93 what does Bitcoin have to do with =E2=80=9Cmarket liquidi=
ty=E2=80=9D and =E2=80=9Ccapital
> requirements=E2=80=9D?
>
> =E2=80=9CBlockstream's innovative solutions are definitely a game changer=
 for the
> Bitcoin industry.=E2=80=9D
>
> Does Blockstream have commercial products now?
>
> "These initial launch partners include Bitfinex, BTCC, Kraken, Unocoin,
> and Xapo, and discussions are underway with another dozen major
> institutional traders and licensed exchanges. "
>
> ??? so many questions and no answers.
>
> Regards,
> Benjamin
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
>

--001a114fb0428a4e7f05220197f7
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div>&gt;Again =E2=80=93 what does Bitcoin have to do=
 with =E2=80=9Cmarket liquidity=E2=80=9D and =E2=80=9Ccapital requirements=
=E2=80=9D?<br><br></div>You seem to be conflating bitcoin with blockstream/=
liquid. Your question does not make sense.<br><br>&gt;Does Blockstream have=
 commercial products now?<br><br></div>Yes. I am sure that was always their=
 plan in order to stay a viable commercial entity<br></div><div class=3D"gm=
ail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 3:25 AM, =
Benjamin via bitcoin-dev <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-de=
v@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfound=
ation.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=
=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=
=3D"ltr"><div><div>Hello all,</div><div><br></div><div>I was very surprised=
 to learn that Blockstream will implement Sidechains for exchanges [1], [2]=
 and has been working on this privately. Can somebody explain this =E2=80=
=9Cannouncement=E2=80=9D? Just a few comments on this =E2=80=9Cproposal=E2=
=80=9D.</div><div>=C2=A0</div><div>=E2=80=9CThis new construction establish=
es a security profile inherently superior to existing methods of rapid tran=
sfer and settlement, and is directly applicable to other problems within ex=
isting financial institutions.=E2=80=9D</div><div><br></div><div>First of a=
ll, what does Bitcoin have to do with existing financial institutions? Seco=
ndly, what in do you mean by =E2=80=9Crapid transfer=E2=80=9D and &quot;set=
tlement&quot;? Bitcoin is anonymous, digital cash. There is no such thing a=
s settlement, there is only the transfer of digital cash and that&#39;s it =
(settlement is a bad word for this kind of transfer of property). If you ma=
ke up new terms define them accurately and don&#39;t play the crypto-buzzwo=
rd-bingo game.</div><div><br></div><div>=E2=80=9CThis, in addition to incre=
asing the security of funds normally subject to explicit counterparty risk,=
 fosters conditions that increase market liquidity and reduce capital requi=
rements for on-blockchain business models.=E2=80=9D</div><div><br></div><di=
v>Again =E2=80=93 what does Bitcoin have to do with =E2=80=9Cmarket liquidi=
ty=E2=80=9D and =E2=80=9Ccapital requirements=E2=80=9D?</div><div><br></div=
><div>=E2=80=9CBlockstream&#39;s innovative solutions are definitely a game=
 changer for the Bitcoin industry.=E2=80=9D</div><div><br></div><div>Does B=
lockstream have commercial products now?</div><div><br></div><div>&quot;The=
se initial launch partners include Bitfinex, BTCC, Kraken, Unocoin, and Xap=
o, and discussions are underway with another dozen major institutional trad=
ers and licensed exchanges. &quot;</div></div><div><br></div><div>??? so ma=
ny questions and no answers.</div><div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div>Be=
njamin</div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.=
linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail=
man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>

--001a114fb0428a4e7f05220197f7--