1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
|
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <bitcoingrant@gmx.com>) id 1UcvjO-0005Ns-Sx
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 16 May 2013 10:48:19 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmx.com
designates 74.208.4.201 as permitted sender)
client-ip=74.208.4.201; envelope-from=bitcoingrant@gmx.com;
helo=mout.gmx.net;
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([74.208.4.201])
by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
id 1UcvjO-0006tP-1g for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 16 May 2013 10:48:18 +0000
Received: from mailout-us.gmx.com ([172.19.198.45]) by mrigmx.server.lan
(mrigmxus002) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0M6m1I-1UFka00Jts-00wUfL for
<bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Thu, 16 May 2013 12:48:12 +0200
Received: (qmail 27146 invoked by uid 0); 16 May 2013 10:48:12 -0000
Received: from 108.61.50.108 by rms-us008 with HTTP
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="========GMXBoundary82691368701289793831"
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 06:48:08 -0400
From: bitcoingrant@gmx.com
Message-ID: <20130516104809.82690@gmx.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Addy Yeow" <ayeowch@gmail.com>
X-Flags: 0001
X-Mailer: GMX.com Web Mailer
x-registered: 0
X-GMX-UID: PtzmcSlB3zOl2JpasXwh1Hd+IGRvb0BZ
X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(bitcoingrant[at]gmx.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
no trust [74.208.4.201 listed in list.dnswl.org]
X-Headers-End: 1UcvjO-0006tP-1g
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Modularizing Bitcoin
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 10:48:19 -0000
--========GMXBoundary82691368701289793831
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
our estimates: ~8000
----- Original Message -----
From: Addy Yeow
Sent: 05/16/13 06:27 AM
To: bitcoingrant@gmx.com
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Modularizing Bitcoin
> Such developments would significantly strengthen the system. Modularization would make cancer attacks less likely and increase the node count, which, currently, is fairly low. Do we know for certain or at least a rough figure of the node count in the network?
--========GMXBoundary82691368701289793831
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<span style=3D'font-family:Verdana'><span style=3D'font-size:12px'>our esti=
mates: ~8000<p style=3D"margin:0px; padding:0px;" >=C2=A0</p><blockquote st=
yle=3D"border-left: 1px solid #CCC; padding-left: 5px; margin-left: 5px; ma=
rgin-bottom: 0px; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px;" type=3D"cite"><p sty=
le=3D"margin:0px; padding:0px;" ><span style=3D"font-family:Verdana"><span =
style=3D"font-size:12px">----- Original Message -----</span></span></p><p s=
tyle=3D"margin:0px; padding:0px;" ><span style=3D"font-family:Verdana"><spa=
n style=3D"font-size:12px">From: Addy Yeow</span></span></p><p style=3D"mar=
gin:0px; padding:0px;" ><span style=3D"font-family:Verdana"><span style=3D"=
font-size:12px">Sent: 05/16/13 06:27 AM</span></span></p><p style=3D"margin=
:0px; padding:0px;" ><span style=3D"font-family:Verdana"><span style=3D"fon=
t-size:12px">To: bitcoingrant@gmx.com</span></span></p><p style=3D"margin:0=
px; padding:0px;" ><span style=3D"font-family:Verdana"><span style=3D"font-=
size:12px">Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Modularizing Bitcoin</span></=
span></p>=C2=A0<div><pre style=3D"white-space: pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-w=
ord; font-size:11;pre">> Such developments would significantly strengthe=
n the system. Modularization would make cancer attacks less likely and incr=
ease the node count, which, currently, is fairly low.=20
Do we know for certain or at least a rough figure of the node count in=20
the network?=20
</pre></div></blockquote></span></span>
--========GMXBoundary82691368701289793831--
|
