1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
|
Return-Path: <dev@jonasschnelli.ch>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D37C1C57
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 8 Mar 2017 21:20:46 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from server3 (server3.include7.ch [144.76.194.38])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23F881F6
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 8 Mar 2017 21:20:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by server3 (Postfix, from userid 115)
id 174632D0024F; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 22:20:45 +0100 (CET)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Received: from [10.0.1.31] (cable-static-140-182.teleport.ch [87.102.140.182])
by server3 (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 854732D0016B;
Wed, 8 Mar 2017 22:20:43 +0100 (CET)
From: Jonas Schnelli <dev@jonasschnelli.ch>
Message-Id: <31FB94D1-5B5B-43EF-AFD8-2A7508464F7C@jonasschnelli.ch>
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="Apple-Mail=_12E6E0A2-590B-429A-BA62-6D3235F64FC8";
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 22:20:39 +0100
In-Reply-To: <beed7ade-13be-3a7f-9a4e-99f77378e780@voskuil.org>
To: Eric Voskuil <eric@voskuil.org>
References: <BL2PR03MB435C5077E69D91D0A8092B6EE2A0@BL2PR03MB435.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
<CADJgMzvuii8Ww822v3DRa=-Azuqo4va6s32MsNSC-6M9=stm1Q@mail.gmail.com>
<BL2PR03MB435029A0856DC7077D4AD68EE2D0@BL2PR03MB435.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
<D4B674DB-8F2E-4AA1-B271-FEE02A62A274@voskuil.org>
<30362205-D0CC-46D9-B924-EFA0A6EA1AC9@jonasschnelli.ch>
<beed7ade-13be-3a7f-9a4e-99f77378e780@voskuil.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
Libbitcoin Development <libbitcoin@lists.dyne.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unique node identifiers
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 21:20:47 -0000
--Apple-Mail=_12E6E0A2-590B-429A-BA62-6D3235F64FC8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
> Am 08.03.2017 um 22:09 schrieb Eric Voskuil <eric@voskuil.org>:
>=20
> On 03/08/2017 11:47 AM, Jonas Schnelli wrote:
>>>> Nodes are by design not supposed to be identifiable in any way
>>>=20
>>> This is of course my objection to BIP150 ("a way for peers to ...
>>> guarantee node ownership=E2=80=9C).
>>=20
>> Please Eric. Stop spreading FUD.
>=20
> I'm always willing to debate this issue. I'm generally a little
> suspicious of one who demands another person to stop arguing. I got at
> least one such demand (along with a threat) on this subject privately
> last summer from a notable Core dev. There is a lengthy thread on this
> subject in which I raised these issues. Everyone is free to review =
that
> discussion.
What you did say in the sentence above (and I think is FUD) is, that =
BIP150 will lead to every node being identifiable. This is just =
completely wrong.
There is nothing to say against a technical debate (and we had this), =
but I will ask you to stop if I see you attacking BIP150/151 at every =
occasion with FUDish arguments like this.
</jonas>
--Apple-Mail=_12E6E0A2-590B-429A-BA62-6D3235F64FC8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=D5Lo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Apple-Mail=_12E6E0A2-590B-429A-BA62-6D3235F64FC8--
|
