summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/d1/78492a8b97dfc89dc35dc9981879de3ca646ce
blob: 1bf0c33016324a2d8589d0e68d6df930ace341a4 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <rnbrady@gmail.com>) id 1YDISQ-00023t-1e
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Mon, 19 Jan 2015 19:57:54 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.214.169 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.214.169; envelope-from=rnbrady@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-ob0-f169.google.com; 
Received: from mail-ob0-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169])
	by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1YDISP-000789-BM
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Mon, 19 Jan 2015 19:57:54 +0000
Received: by mail-ob0-f169.google.com with SMTP id va8so6570472obc.0
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Mon, 19 Jan 2015 11:57:48 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.141.231 with SMTP id rr7mr1159311oeb.19.1421697467950;
	Mon, 19 Jan 2015 11:57:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.76.153.164 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 11:57:47 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <2C7D6208-1921-4DDC-90FE-DB1ABE1D61DB@petertodd.org>
References: <CAN5esQJe0uUm0NyctaBa6WH7_JjeE_OLR=FY_XQWnSr50VRDyA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJHLa0OTynX4oiQoyanpRKE2tpAuS4L5X-2j20328725J9RrvQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<2C7D6208-1921-4DDC-90FE-DB1ABE1D61DB@petertodd.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 19:57:47 +0000
Message-ID: <CAN5esQLCV=L0kYxDGhK2F=qZ8OqMxyYS+-Pn17U_M+nV4Sj3Og@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard Brady <rnbrady@gmail.com>
To: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b339a3f8e2d3b050d06bc03
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(rnbrady[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1YDISP-000789-BM
Cc: Bitcoin <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP70: why Google Protocol Buffers for
	encoding?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 19:57:54 -0000

--047d7b339a3f8e2d3b050d06bc03
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Thanks guys, great answers.

The design choice certainly makes a lot more sense now regardless of
whether one agrees with it or not.

Regards,
Richard

--047d7b339a3f8e2d3b050d06bc03
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div><div class=3D"gmail_signat=
ure">Thanks guys, great answers.=C2=A0</div><div class=3D"gmail_signature">=
<br></div><div class=3D"gmail_signature">The design choice certainly makes =
a lot more sense now regardless of whether one agrees with it or not.</div>=
</div><div class=3D"gmail_signature"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_signatur=
e">Regards,</div><div class=3D"gmail_signature">Richard</div>
<br></div></div>

--047d7b339a3f8e2d3b050d06bc03--