1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
|
Return-Path: <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9937D1893
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 1 Oct 2015 00:11:51 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com (mail-wi0-f180.google.com
[209.85.212.180])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBA0B138
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 1 Oct 2015 00:11:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wicfx3 with SMTP id fx3so5564868wic.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 30 Sep 2015 17:11:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
bh=L9lyPY0tbZ+CiH8q0e3c8OQa2YYBBlhe2RP4ND7J7cA=;
b=dEPpS4DfajqPC44mQQvj4mxTz26K9Fqv16M2fMbQe/Q+ntI9V3cJYNYsgs6ZnhW7bl
encWBJ5s8LnVilCYnvSmDh7nfdvlSllY20y8XuENoGXRuNeKyK4duVXe6D8HY4u1QXbl
aBFiK4vmxdWAAdUAPBWUXrIYQBHEIzerETfJc75Ykd/BN3oVPnTXTHL7xRQ8/lgn9Nlo
lj/vX12YDFwaT5GQkivzcAHM5yw9ylvXbwoRPq5bhbnKMvy84NSS1ULsZHTqsLUKgIOy
HpJfwJvKYboKuTrqeJbrGHHxReVsXOF66RSmZmTEwmUXRlIJKDhJ/6kkzWW7APwDKLA8
1sXg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQndKySHT1yCR+Na/FCNq3HsDnDoHOzW0xGZRbK4Ai/FVj+4izxOZ40CGypNFWk1YB2650Ya
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.186.98 with SMTP id fj2mr176621wic.58.1443658309713;
Wed, 30 Sep 2015 17:11:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.114.199 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 17:11:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.114.199 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 17:11:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABm2gDqAhjd1721XPjjAiev4coveLM0NUE9ng+W2tgswHiW5bg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20150927185031.GA20599@savin.petertodd.org>
<CA+w+GKRCVr-9TVk66utp7xLRgTxNpxYoj3XQE-6y_N8JS6eO6Q@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAS2fgSEDGBd67m7i8zCgNRqtmQrZyZMj7a5TsYo41Dh=tdhHQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+w+GKRKGS=KZrLtiW8Zbn4EQH_TELfQR+TfrADCMXLR22Q+tw@mail.gmail.com>
<CADm_WcbJoH27H9ckr5sfmE0gh7YbSjKr1uLse0s3b4GTT+jEAA@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+w+GKS01sVXqNY6a39EjqL8NVO6k1Vq6sd0VZjeqF_tsx7OAA@mail.gmail.com>
<CABm2gDpojk4Sb9eVVcFiaQng+mKs+3iWFu_Ep0h7VC1ip7US5Q@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+w+GKTf2vnJ0WdrK1HzFwCx154e=BP=kGcZvGYY7cbcijwLSQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CABm2gDqAhjd1721XPjjAiev4coveLM0NUE9ng+W2tgswHiW5bg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 02:11:49 +0200
Message-ID: <CABm2gDrr2qg4NCCLR0Ut2Jj1Wq2ieRS2EZkM+Ytb0a6ieZrSuA@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
To: Mike Hearn <hearn@vinumeris.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c263d8ba5ec80520ffe4c3
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Let's deploy BIP65 CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY!
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 00:11:51 -0000
--001a11c263d8ba5ec80520ffe4c3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Oct 1, 2015 12:14 AM, "Jorge Tim=C3=B3n" <jtimon@jtimon.cc> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:06 PM, Mike Hearn <hearn@vinumeris.com> wrote:
> >> Exactly, all those "mini divergences" eventually disappear
> >
> > A miner that has accepted a newly invalid transaction into its memory
pool
> > and is trying to mine it, will keep producing invalid blocks forever
until
> > the owner shuts it down and upgrades. This was happening for weeks afte=
r
> > P2SH triggered.
> >
> > For instance, any miner that has modified/bypassed IsStandard() can do
this,
> > or any miner that accepts direct transaction submission, or any miner
that
> > runs an old node from before OP_NOPs were made non-standard.
>
> That is correct. But doesn't seem to contradict anything I said.
Actually, no, sorry, the second paragraph is not correct as explained by
Greg Maxwell.
--001a11c263d8ba5ec80520ffe4c3
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<p dir=3D"ltr"><br>
On Oct 1, 2015 12:14 AM, "Jorge Tim=C3=B3n" <jtimon@jtimon.cc&=
gt; wrote:<br>
><br>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:06 PM, Mike Hearn <<a href=3D"mailto:hea=
rn@vinumeris.com">hearn@vinumeris.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> >> Exactly, all those "mini divergences" eventually di=
sappear<br>
> ><br>
> > A miner that has accepted a newly invalid transaction into its me=
mory pool<br>
> > and is trying to mine it, will keep producing invalid blocks fore=
ver until<br>
> > the owner shuts it down and upgrades. This was happening for week=
s after<br>
> > P2SH triggered.<br>
> ><br>
> > For instance, any miner that has modified/bypassed IsStandard() c=
an do this,<br>
> > or any miner that accepts direct transaction submission, or any m=
iner that<br>
> > runs an old node from before OP_NOPs were made non-standard.<br>
><br>
> That is correct. But doesn't seem to contradict anything I said.</=
p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">Actually, no, sorry, the second paragraph is not correct as =
explained by Greg Maxwell.<br>
</p>
--001a11c263d8ba5ec80520ffe4c3--
|
