1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
|
Return-Path: <psharp.x13@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BD6195D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 26 Sep 2017 00:07:14 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-yw0-f178.google.com (mail-yw0-f178.google.com
[209.85.161.178])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8A95420
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 26 Sep 2017 00:07:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-yw0-f178.google.com with SMTP id w9so5957837ywi.11
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 25 Sep 2017 17:07:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc; bh=OlYePRYyxWkohNyPPoJsgqakNEAImkrEycogumaOJ90=;
b=UjyhXv7A89cyScsKmqDzSB7WVhjHh8k1w03YSiGu8XRBQ8mCA3GY3RjxflBvAQDYYF
liCgplSHiSD2YU9LASiqZuepqIGmx/OsfyG2RRW8a6EFf1oPk532WE/oUvScD8UlFn5A
6e2fnCgxTc0HfXqfuh7toNWQwIEy8mqe8BcbOuJXHb5iPjzSGHWaSZT/vAGiXlT5gJay
IF0WlNVA9Y4twACm6++Odq2WSqh6SuGAMr4OZwj3NcMt1D5rtLj2sJxjmEyb8TD9NDw+
TroKNaWxBSvR0cKKBEWRPm7UxPlNrE0araV9b90eyPFQOP/i7zgusdO+3HjSkboiBz9S
/CoA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=OlYePRYyxWkohNyPPoJsgqakNEAImkrEycogumaOJ90=;
b=GpX1q14sJvAqZOx4F+EoUnl52GUt1HKpV1F1Dkek+iaGC/0B6w/WwmJBIKRXNp3QGk
UpnOYBLUR9ID4V6pq3lJLpu+tlPoopkWtQ3+eDkSMHGO9GCSqFmP2pnGEgSa12HaGwcY
3P6r4bdmFhoMXV8u2PwC6a4w0eHulAEgLqDdJFPFdPxtscl6VtkavgjfZUyAmWa5Isw3
dzIMtPdiJTXfk6v84mwjni0WMb/C4peq03V2VYiiScwd16SkUorwHNSxQPGPimseR+DL
RwuDdfuEVtP+NfDFfgoSG29w/dl2LWRy5H5LC9UKRNNd+q/kyPuc/+xB6tDC3hraHfkE
tvAw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUgUaeFNe9Z015vcGYvZUzoOyqPm2SlDWrRO9OhSnKTDQ5uJ1lrI
38mtIvHriCUuDjbMT1VYxrwwJ3cat4xPGDNKNek=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QCmUHiZAyNnPeGmfOo4ChnOv0q5wK9/levRksj6b/7h6CW3qZFbIF0Bzb93zOhUHZRjAEm96op5+pgRtZAbB8g=
X-Received: by 10.37.210.71 with SMTP id j68mr5548495ybg.358.1506384432678;
Mon, 25 Sep 2017 17:07:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.45.77 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 17:07:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAF5CFkheg5U0zPLSq9ow2aFZept8nGN94q894yRjiuvAY5s7Fw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAES+R-q6v=Qc2zZgczNfKhrBtZ0kCt0Um90miAMGB0npp4zAKQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAF5CFkheg5U0zPLSq9ow2aFZept8nGN94q894yRjiuvAY5s7Fw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Patrick Sharp <psharp.x13@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 18:07:12 -0600
Message-ID: <CAES+R-pHkDHSPpTcyJyEv2rSWOvAkG+zUqs8hPwbHigejyFvDw@mail.gmail.com>
To: CryptAxe <cryptaxe@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c055a7c014e5a055a0c758e"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 00:13:15 +0000
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] idea post: bitcoin side chain implementation
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 00:07:14 -0000
--94eb2c055a7c014e5a055a0c758e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
I shamefully was not aware. However familiarized myself with them.
Non official chains suffer from the fact that few if any miners are going
to mine them so they lack security on par with the main chain. And more
over most users aren't going to use them because its not magic.
That being said think they are and will always be a great place to develop
and prove out concepts.
If my ultimate goal is official side chains that include part of the reward
such security is at parity between all chains and that the official
software automatically enable users to distribute their burden, would my
course of action be to build an external proof-of-concept side chain of
side chains?
or do you doubt that official reward splitting chains will ever find their
way into bitcoin core?
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 4:58 PM, CryptAxe <cryptaxe@gmail.com> wrote:
> Have you taken a look at Elements or Drivechains yet by chance?
>
--94eb2c055a7c014e5a055a0c758e
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">I shamefully was not aware. However familiarized myself wi=
th them.<div><br></div><div>Non official chains suffer from the fact that f=
ew if any miners are going to mine them so they lack security on par with t=
he main chain. And more over most users aren't going to use them becaus=
e its not magic.</div><div><br></div><div>That being said think they are an=
d will always be a great place to develop and prove out concepts.</div><div=
><br></div><div>If my ultimate goal is official side chains that include pa=
rt of the reward such security is at parity between all chains and that the=
official software automatically enable users to distribute their burden, w=
ould my course of action be to build an external proof-of-concept side chai=
n of side chains?</div><div>or do you doubt that official reward splitting =
chains will ever find their way into bitcoin core?</div></div><div class=3D=
"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 4:58 P=
M, CryptAxe <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:cryptaxe@gmail.com" tar=
get=3D"_blank">cryptaxe@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote clas=
s=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;pad=
ding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"auto">Have you taken a look at Elements or Drive=
chains yet by chance?</div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>
--94eb2c055a7c014e5a055a0c758e--
|
