1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
|
Return-Path: <user@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17846C002D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 21 Oct 2022 00:26:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1949408C0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 21 Oct 2022 00:26:20 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org D1949408C0
Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key,
unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com
header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm3 header.b=gXAkEVPu
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.602
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id Yc-Sr1YJruZb
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 21 Oct 2022 00:26:19 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org A2C27400D9
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com
[66.111.4.27])
by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2C27400D9
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 21 Oct 2022 00:26:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46])
by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DA065C0084;
Thu, 20 Oct 2022 20:26:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162])
by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 20 Oct 2022 20:26:15 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:date:date:feedback-id
:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id
:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to
:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=
fm3; t=1666311975; x=1666398375; bh=eA1mHeWFAn0W74/l/lwEkw7iPMV/
kWCRwORqZyAc+Bk=; b=gXAkEVPuGUL86VbXqWqxRAKQCVYsOq9rjcZygu4VKuSV
ytbmVJiMgYFUFBzrIc/kKohkaTqTQMavmHWRtcryWXEoewNV6wDx4slR68ePccKb
1CF68znFo786LsJF197awklMkeX4wtcWwBexNXDrXyvDmAzkuxWHyG3anIAbtKti
pY4FqSaghiRJZ7pYDgHvb0765ZN5GRBqIYBuqRUtMh/hGNPVM95i+jMmW4lqfiyG
KVtb9RWGLFvUc9ubBkjMPHQlzMeUxkWHJB9pjCezhmcGkKaKQNd6I/eyiKrVlJEy
0mD/R+jnEutqq8mS+4qlzz82x8GEM8yhfXq4njeEtA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:JudRY5ldOyP9p-Nvlam1Lj8Tblymdy1CVPmN4hB1_TGw7Tdb6FS6yQ>
<xme:JudRY01sYJUVqPREKuJ3IzEEifGQMHkR0ka7CTcs25HvVxWPjip7XtnYt_yNcCEPR
qtoSG5hmuYGcmmXbrI>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:JudRY_qit89UehqBzmizxyVXrayR44FoMzfcC68jqFHekD1cvoSwy9qjPjPPVOucpG8eeyaQzQ1E0OeVI_ke2Cr3uO76>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrfeeljedgfeeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf
fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen
uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne
cujfgurhepfffhvfevuffkfhggtggujgesghdtreertddtvdenucfhrhhomheprfgvthgv
rhcuvfhougguuceophgvthgvsehpvghtvghrthhouggurdhorhhgqeenucggtffrrghtth
gvrhhnpedttdegtdffteeukeffhfffkeekiefhteduvdetjeeujeffgeevgefhudetjefh
veenucffohhmrghinhepghhithhhuhgsrdgtohhmpdhpvghtvghrthhouggurdhorhhgne
cuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepuhhsvghr
sehpvghtvghrthhouggurdhorhhg
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:JudRY5ls-LwJspyEixWYJJ-Tp5nwXCNyqPC-0lCHtW1K7sdAP2fHlQ>
<xmx:JudRY313p652mHDU410PgNFDeKmPxR6uktMSPtISR2sy2mTBsfIN1A>
<xmx:JudRY4vKyuDARll9f-7z7I9QViNhrsLrD01lcZtnp3XSBwdCG18vLA>
<xmx:J-dRY4zWr26u7CozeJGwGSptIFQ95qyp_nBtArlnPl5uPlLlt_-j1g>
Feedback-ID: i525146e8:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu,
20 Oct 2022 20:26:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 2D74F204BA; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 20:26:14 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 20:26:14 -0400
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Jeremy Rubin <jeremy.l.rubin@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <Y1HnJnpW9Al1W8cP@petertodd.org>
References: <CAD5xwhjXh33AdK96eToHtDP3t_Zx5JbxCqJFbAQRRRKy6rFC2Q@mail.gmail.com>
<Y1HLgLkCmVJQtqT+@petertodd.org>
<CAD5xwhhiOReFJq2gOk2n5tJpD-X-x8aKGrdkdrwi1yJCis0y4g@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/T6c3ZEKEW6oe8A3"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAD5xwhhiOReFJq2gOk2n5tJpD-X-x8aKGrdkdrwi1yJCis0y4g@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Does Bitcoin require or have an honest majority
or a rational one? (re rbf)
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 00:26:21 -0000
--/T6c3ZEKEW6oe8A3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 04:54:00PM -0700, Jeremy Rubin wrote:
> The difference between honest majority and longest chain is that the
> longest chain bug was something acknowledged by Satoshi & patched
> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/40cd0369419323f8d7385950e20342e=
998c994e1#diff-623e3fd6da1a45222eeec71496747b31R420
> .
>=20
>=20
> OTOH, we have more explicit references that the honest majority really
> should be thought of as good guys vs bad guys... e.g.
The point is Satoshi got a lot of very fundamental stuff wrong. Bringing up
what Satoshi wrote now, almost 14 years later, misleads less-technical read=
ers
into thinking our understanding of Bitcoin is still based on that early,
incorrect, understanding.
Incidentally, you realize that it was _Satoshi_ who added RBF to Bitcoin wi=
th
nSequence replacements. My contribution was to fix that obviously broken de=
sign
with fee-based RBF (with nSequence a transaction could be replaced up to 4
billion times, using essentially unlimited P2P bandwidth; it was a terrible
idea).
> I do think the case can be fairly made for full RBF, but if you don't grok
> the above maybe you won't have as much empathy for people who built a
> business around particular aspects of the Bitcoin network that they feel
> are now being changed. They have every right to be mad about that and make
> disagreements known and argue for why we should preserve these properties.
Those people run mild sybil attacks on the network in their efforts to
"mitigate risk" by monitoring propagation; fundamentally doing so is
centralizing and unfair, as only a small number of companies can do that
without DoS attacking the P2P network. It's pretty obvious that reliance to
zeroconf is harmful to Bitcoin, and people trying to do that have repeatedly
taken big losses when their risk mitigations turned out to not work. Their =
only
right to be mad comes from the 1st Ammendment.
> As someone who wants for Bitcoin to be a system which doesn't arbitrarily
> change rules based on the whims of others, I think it important that we c=
an
> steelman and provide strong cases for why our actions might be in the
> wrong, so that we make sure our justifications are not only well-justifie=
d,
> but that we can communicate them clearly to all participants in a global
> value network.
=2E..and the easiest way to avoid Bitcoin being a system that doesn't arbit=
rarily
change rules, is to rely on economically rational rules that aren't likely =
to
change!
--=20
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
--/T6c3ZEKEW6oe8A3
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEFcyURjhyM68BBPYTJIFAPaXwkfsFAmNR5yEACgkQJIFAPaXw
kfsk+wf/TJVocaamIIrOKJM2cuuyYhSRUFEbncjWJ7IQ6AaYkY81TmPJGOMU5hm3
LxoTZDfb/ILaH3SMydiDmGHwhKrShDmb9R1mXQ/an3U206DHyNlQrTwenHw7E94r
pAdbCC+C+FS6hlKJ8YTZqYIe48R4kG44mbaQJwZDdiu5gghsgyRt06x1D33Cjt8Z
Pk5vUPY2vWU6pNcBYBb4hStW2ALWee2uNv13gWRsUnkiQhLdHhRCMh27e0ZI6rAw
BiMzbHSe2fwM3w3wEvjgvJEHf3t9HDTuNU8MuKOjYQ1Rl1XQTmUPz1FzUXez1v6w
2ZKeVtWRsZFpRlEvv4yhM/rrcgd/Og==
=h0oo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--/T6c3ZEKEW6oe8A3--
|
