1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
|
Return-Path: <Daniel.Weigl@mycelium.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1501E412
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 7 Sep 2016 10:12:34 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: delayed 00:30:02 by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mx.mycelium.com (mx.mycelium.com [188.40.34.2])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BC091A0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 7 Sep 2016 10:12:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from 178-189-179-206.adsl.highway.telekom.at ([178.189.179.206]
helo=[10.0.0.77])
by mx.mycelium.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128)
(Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <Daniel.Weigl@mycelium.com>)
id 1bhZNB-0005tQ-KV for bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org;
Wed, 07 Sep 2016 11:42:29 +0200
To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
References: <5760259B.7040409@mycelium.com>
From: Daniel Weigl <Daniel.Weigl@mycelium.com>
Message-ID: <516ecb1e-d8a8-719d-629b-59af808c1b6b@mycelium.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 11:42:24 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5760259B.7040409@mycelium.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Score: -101.0 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] [cont'd] Derivation scheme for P2WPKH-nested-in-P2SH
based accounts
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2016 10:12:34 -0000
Hello again,
sorry, got a bit derailed on that proposal.
But now I think its time to work on it again.
- Any objections to get a BIP-number for it?
If not, can I get one, so I can finish up the test vectors.
Current version: https://github.com/DanielWeigl/bips/blob/master/bip-p2sh-accounts.mediawiki
- I decided against extending it for future P2WPKH addresses
I think that should be a separate account on its own, to reduce implementation work
for future wallets, that only want/need to implement P2WPKH accounts. And to keep it simple.
Was someone working on the P2WPKH address format in the meantime? (ie. alternative for [2])
- We will also need a extension to the BIP32 serialization format[1]
It should be possible to export/import a xPriv/xPub key across compatible wallets, and they
should be able without guesswork, fuzzy checks or asking the user to import the correct account type.
Thinking about some flexible tag-based backwards compatible extensions - but thats a different BIP in itself.
Cheers,
Daniel
[1] https://github.com/DanielWeigl/bips/blob/master/bip-0032.mediawiki#Serialization_format
[2] https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0142.mediawiki
On 2016-06-14 17:41, Daniel Weigl via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> Following up to the discussion last month ( https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2016-May/012695.html ), ive prepared a proposal for a BIP here:
>
> https://github.com/DanielWeigl/bips/blob/master/bip-p2sh-accounts.mediawiki
>
>
> Any comments on it? Does anyone working on a BIP44 compliant wallet implement something different?
> If there are no objection, id also like to request a number for it.
>
> Thx,
> Daniel
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
|
