1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
|
Return-Path: <vjudeu@gazeta.pl>
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34C5BC002B
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 18 Feb 2023 09:48:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0372C80DAD
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 18 Feb 2023 09:48:17 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 0372C80DAD
Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org;
dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gazeta.pl header.i=@gazeta.pl
header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=2013 header.b=pjAQ8+D0
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id xFFneTQPgIKM
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 18 Feb 2023 09:48:15 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 6DEA0812A1
Received: from smtpo90.poczta.onet.pl (smtpo90.poczta.onet.pl
[213.180.149.143])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DEA0812A1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 18 Feb 2023 09:48:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pmq3v.m5r2.onet (pmq3v.m5r2.onet [10.174.32.69])
by smtp.poczta.onet.pl (Onet) with ESMTP id 4PJkPy0W0Gz2K24x5;
Sat, 18 Feb 2023 10:48:05 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gazeta.pl; s=2013;
t=1676713686; bh=1W9G7gr/Xg5q3ejIwJ+WsmH4Fz207DP8EVYbdLFsf64=;
h=From:To:In-Reply-To:Date:Subject:From;
b=pjAQ8+D0rbfAn5hIUS7yXOvn29wyR5Cf9wi6TXd+ZQqF1kDHu/rHGf7usSPZCgGOG
fKYnriOUApvBswfbMm759BS/V/ApY1c8kyVoclnjoFQAFN+p0B5tXU5isxgPWyGhzD
smqZzrVfiDVUo/M7IEw2vguaxXQjSXaTZex/N/hw=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Received: from [5.173.232.145] by pmq3v.m5r2.onet via HTTP id ;
Sat, 18 Feb 2023 10:48:05 +0100
From: vjudeu@gazeta.pl
X-Priority: 3
To: Andrew Poelstra <apoelstra@wpsoftware.net>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <Y/AQH9s7RN14uKvE@camus>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2023 10:48:02 +0100
Message-Id: <177848612-ad2b15230d78bcd732bbe8621af89a1e@pmq3v.m5r2.onet>
X-Mailer: onet.poczta
X-Onet-PMQ: <vjudeu@gazeta.pl>;5.173.232.145;PL;2
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 18 Feb 2023 10:11:53 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Testing censorship resistance of bitcoin p2p
network
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2023 09:48:17 -0000
> By standardness rules (where you can have up to 80-byte pushes), a little=
over 1%. By consensus (520-byte pushes) less than 0.2%.
Note that instead of "OP_DROP OP_DROP", people can use "OP_2DROP", so the n=
umber of dropping opcodes could be halved.
> I mean, they'd provide the `FALSE` as a separate witness element rather t=
han being part of the witnessScript.
That means people can still reject an official alternative (for example com=
mitments), so a different approach is needed to fight that spam. Assuming t=
hat transactions will be sent directly to the miners, they will be included=
, that way or another. So, the solution should assume that we will have lar=
ge NOPs in the chain. And then, if we want to deal with them, some kind of =
pruning is needed. Switching from witness to non-witness node is not an opt=
ion, because it would require additional witness validation, and because ru=
les for OP_RETURN can be also lifted.
So, how to prune the Script? In a typical hash function, like SHA-256, data=
are splitted into smaller chunks, and then processed linearly. I think it =
is possible to store the first and the last chunk, and keep the internal st=
ate of SHA-256, before entering the last chunk. In this way, it should be p=
ossible to prune those OP_NOPs. Because that solution will also cover raw s=
cripts (people can switch to them if witness will be more restricted than n=
ow).
Also, it gives us a hint, that if any Script upgrade will be considered in =
the future, we can think about doing it in a way, where unused parts can be=
pruned, without invalidating signatures.
On 2023-02-18 00:39:16 user Andrew Poelstra <apoelstra@wpsoftware.net> wrot=
e:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 11:35:34PM +0000, Andrew Poelstra via bitcoin-dev=
wrote:
> =
> If you ban any of these specific script fragments then spammers will
> just use `IF <anything> ENDIF` and provide the `FALSE` as a zero push.
> And banning *this* would ban legitimate use cases.
>
I realize this is confusingly worded. I mean, they'd provide the `FALSE`
as a separate witness element rather than being part of the witnessScript.
-- =
Andrew Poelstra
Director of Research, Blockstream
Email: apoelstra at wpsoftware.net
Web: https://www.wpsoftware.net/andrew
The sun is always shining in space
-Justin Lewis-Webster
|
