summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/cc/ce6e678ddd3174c56fdc15f1501ed929e4221f
blob: a899eeafcab513ecd0b221a017eebe89a61e22de (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
Return-Path: <milly@bitcoins.info>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C22761678
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon,  5 Oct 2015 21:37:08 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail.help.org (mail.help.org [70.90.2.18])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FE3C112
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon,  5 Oct 2015 21:37:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.1.10.25] (Unknown [10.1.10.25]) by mail.help.org with ESMTPA
	; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 17:37:04 -0400
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
References: <CAKzdR-rPoByn=+CgsTc1ZnLkjwtYyJnbQLbn-VHOvz0dLciefQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<2081461.sDX5ARzIdv@garp>
	<CAAS2fgSsJ10P7YYAAsV4P6no3pC=WYozWuN64u=WLSB3h6cHwA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1819769.E416F0XigG@garp>
	<9269B3FB-2ED2-469D-9FE2-783CC2EB252C@gmx.com>
	<CAAS2fgTLH2LNKZp1AMO_Gq_ba2KdryyrL8r1bMPQ0gFPAV4GTQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Milly Bitcoin <milly@bitcoins.info>
Message-ID: <5612ED72.1060802@bitcoins.info>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 17:36:50 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgTLH2LNKZp1AMO_Gq_ba2KdryyrL8r1bMPQ0gFPAV4GTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] This thread is not about the soft/hard fork
 technical debate
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 21:37:08 -0000

On 10/5/2015 5:30 PM, Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 9:27 PM, Peter R via bitcoin-dev
> <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> Once again, let’s use the current gridlock
>

> there is no gridlock here and an effort to manufacturer
> one for political reasons will not be successful.

Worthless discussion over the definition of "gridlock."

Russ