1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
|
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <pete@petertodd.org>) id 1VALUs-0003ax-TR
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Fri, 16 Aug 2013 14:59:26 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of petertodd.org
designates 62.13.149.80 as permitted sender)
client-ip=62.13.149.80; envelope-from=pete@petertodd.org;
helo=outmail149080.authsmtp.com;
Received: from outmail149080.authsmtp.com ([62.13.149.80])
by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
id 1VALUq-0002QO-Q9 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Fri, 16 Aug 2013 14:59:26 +0000
Received: from mail-c233.authsmtp.com (mail-c233.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.233])
by punt10.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/Kp) with ESMTP id
r7GExG2q097655; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 15:59:16 +0100 (BST)
Received: from petertodd.org (petertodd.org [174.129.28.249])
(authenticated bits=128)
by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id r7GExCeR033522
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
Fri, 16 Aug 2013 15:59:15 +0100 (BST)
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 10:59:12 -0400
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
Message-ID: <20130816145912.GA16533@petertodd.org>
References: <CABsx9T32q8mKgtmsaZgh7nuhHY5cExeW=FiadzXq3jXVP=NBTw@mail.gmail.com>
<CANEZrP0PEcP339MKRyrHXHCCsP3BxRHT-ZfKRQ7G2Ou+15CD7A@mail.gmail.com>
<CANEZrP3LAR0erjgmTHruLwPNDdx-OVyb9KK52E6UnmE4ZuBrvQ@mail.gmail.com>
<20130816140116.GB16201@petertodd.org>
<20130816141536.GD16201@petertodd.org>
<CAEz79PoK9u9ffJ5jR8yXk8eCFP0Ytk_bno0mpcpM24mt-GGg5w@mail.gmail.com>
<CANEZrP3hHh3k5+ePGbqVeyo3oV=RTy36FA+8MbOZXg3yMqRxAw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CANEZrP3hHh3k5+ePGbqVeyo3oV=RTy36FA+8MbOZXg3yMqRxAw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Server-Quench: 6b32ef6e-0684-11e3-86a8-0025907707a1
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
aQdMdwQUGUATAgsB AmUbWlFeVVR7WGY7 ag1VcwRfa1RMVxto
VEFWR1pVCwQmQxt2 c1ZtB3tydAZDenw+ bEJkWj5dDkd4IBB7
F1NUE2UCeGZhPWMC WEYJfx5UcAFPdx9C bVB4BXJDAzANdhES
HhM4ODE3eDlSNilR RRkIIFQOdA4kFyA9 QV8ZVS0oBlFAH2Ni
ZyABBnlUGEcKLgN0 dzMA
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1021:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 174.129.28.249/587
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
X-Headers-End: 1VALUq-0002QO-Q9
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Gavin's post-0.9 TODO list...
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 14:59:27 -0000
--2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 04:36:20PM +0200, Mike Hearn wrote:
> That change was made in response to user complaints. Heck we get complain=
ts
> about battery life and bandwidth impact even with Bloom filtering. We can=
't
> just randomly start using peoples bandwidth for relaying blocks, especial=
ly
> as I guess most SPV nodes are behind NAT.
UPNP seems to work well for the reference client. What's the situation
there on Android?
I leave my phone plugged in and connected via wifi for most of the day;
lots of people do that.
The user interface for this stuff is very simple: "How much bandwidth
will you contribute back? If you contribute more bandwidth back, other
peers will prioritize you and your wallet will be more reliable."
--=20
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
000000000000003cfc051263917373a1cab2655994b97c54a625021f52c84658
--2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlIOPkAACgkQpEFN739thowjjgCfakCQlo/AGESvpE6iIi5K9PRh
U5UAn3PzWOiwDRm7n0mfFc4uDFkVPrxv
=xDza
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO--
|
