1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
|
Return-Path: <rgrant@rgrant.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D56BFE73
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 4 Feb 2016 17:46:09 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-yw0-f174.google.com (mail-yw0-f174.google.com
[209.85.161.174])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B01A144
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 4 Feb 2016 17:46:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-yw0-f174.google.com with SMTP id g127so31146745ywf.2
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 04 Feb 2016 09:46:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=rgrant-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
:subject:to:cc:content-type;
bh=t+aAcRcjNGMQaMxAycSOOhAv3tr7u+3lTB5TQ9YQs+w=;
b=KjOQPolDvcD5W178bpSNSwes35uGs2ZxHApZtMfqlpKjwqz2QMm89Nkt9QXoZih6/L
2D/1X/T0voC1gOyj1SmtU3ZnQCBms80ytec0Tt+Z4vMUgga9QRC7tCIyIWyewF4dv5Z7
EiifbZfP+JY+OV6hUW0TOJ9hEHU/gkt63hU/Ow0d30fzgIYuAGbFyRkIwHAb14cWVgUu
oWzVUOy84CUyK7X7NQVG8fA5Su2NS3897LkpPuvWl10GKHe4lThpLDFkQJpTDopMLEHH
QRwvbOXQzof4bJvJVUzJ8gz2+pN5utaCvmco6hHsWEpFuFspJfdB09uftthLaZj2DbGZ
jiNQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from
:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;
bh=t+aAcRcjNGMQaMxAycSOOhAv3tr7u+3lTB5TQ9YQs+w=;
b=BdWEXXSsNNgAlimXytQffwX97h74Lh4Kqevj+DFwx/gvGcutRe992N3Mw0HSeBYm47
jFGkpvcLZf1/opZUf3hfLskL5yhO9SfrXHQrvkok30pz4zLlE6A3i7xWPkftTOZ1RGVg
tnjePQ/hEIsiN9xYKUQc7m+7ajT0YFGLuqt5Krhr1nN9DHqrRtv17c+rV7/eXBY2LmSD
XGgzTiLZjpug7QbMBtYMwfpJFh+AI5u/VWFBBaTaWRIzz/dI2UbhsVtL16zQRCHHTJQl
h6cj6kOfjmMbkruD4iK1QGeffRvycOfvNJq9BCHeMH2zxR89aiYFtj51JyaP1GQRRBGT
1eqw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQUVoJdI6KPGaAPvMW1+VlNiZjEdGyObA9JPlN0HFYuAu0NAZvi/RRniNv/BhStM7x5UrkM2SH95hyvIg==
X-Received: by 10.129.108.75 with SMTP id h72mr4314753ywc.299.1454607968559;
Thu, 04 Feb 2016 09:46:08 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: rgrant@rgrant.org
Received: by 10.37.44.72 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 09:45:38 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <201602040415.47580.luke@dashjr.org>
References: <201602012253.18009.luke@dashjr.org>
<201602040415.47580.luke@dashjr.org>
From: Ryan Grant <bitcoin-dev@rgrant.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 13:45:38 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 5v4RdXWCyAzW3Jpk3ajCqUzAvK0
Message-ID: <CAMnpzfqVhfFimvX0zU-SCcEL8JGzjnWu8D3v_Ph4kbeGtr8r=w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 17:48:38 +0000
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Process: Status, comments,
and copyright licenses
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 17:46:10 -0000
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 12:15 AM, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Various changes have been made based on initial input.
> Further review and re-review is of course welcome.
These recent edits definitely guide us towards less hard feelings when
comments are offered, without excessive policy structure.
[BIP 2:]
> A process BIP may change status from Draft to Active when it
> achieves rough consensus on the mailing list.
Is this mix of wiki and mailing list intentional? If so, the wiki
talk page is meant to be a self-curated permanent record of support
and dissent, but second-order reply commentary might fall either on
the wiki or the mailing list?
Mediawiki offers watchlists on a polling model, and there is some
email support [1], but it would be nice of a BIP author to at least
gather new/edited comment titles and report them to bitcoin-dev once a
week, during review. Someone has to stare at the diffs.
[1] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Page_change_notification
BIP 2 should ask that all current and future forums that BIP authors
might choose for review have indisputable records of moderation and
user edits.
Is dump.bitcoin.it a sufficient public record of contentious
moderation or user cross-comment editing? It seems like as long as
the wiki as a whole is verifiable, it would suffice.
|
