1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
|
Return-Path: <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9D78AF5
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 30 Oct 2017 14:26:31 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-yw0-f178.google.com (mail-yw0-f178.google.com
[209.85.161.178])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 883391A0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 30 Oct 2017 14:26:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-yw0-f178.google.com with SMTP id w2so11687870ywa.9
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 30 Oct 2017 07:26:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=E32L3dx2Aqoe8uUxmCkDSneA3jIi1UY0/MKnvv9hc5o=;
b=uSGYQkZFPexXTNOscA5CZAc5FVDWrtG7b9lm2CNGFxN49pqP/EGyqw/3llRHJTzkmi
6UTHGV1oLay0P/bHGZt5BPQyDVotd0hmbRtndi9P2k/RFz0+KUgjX+rG4/ZvkjIYZNyz
x6O/So4WuPVNajtrdYveFbD6DAdV2qY64g2aGe9g0tB03YZVJkrYS8a0Fjj+Av9L3Mt2
GfirNiEbggjYXhjeL2rwTjV5tRuo/sCffepTpyfUAp5XSa42nrVvrQeM2pQI0zBF+dJA
HaAfKJoVqvoI/PNqhrHQ8KPf9DiUNK5MVc74StP1EsBxHLBtm/CAXD8bUVrZ18bh/iN8
Cjqw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to;
bh=E32L3dx2Aqoe8uUxmCkDSneA3jIi1UY0/MKnvv9hc5o=;
b=YXRh+bjXC27LApErPV15DDA3Kkm9eYsABZ5bLnAZFrMLY1FY39GH/er5SZapF+Sx63
mTi3LGAkDpYPQqHwmjeYp8aJ+V/z67Xlgesof+9PyRxODupXErYHs6aUz5sf9/jy5ECS
612Hjx90XNV6KizylTQdkGMomlXisnGcdHeQ0K6tcbxoA+2qtiDgOWet7Vdl+/owZOx7
OTm4hsuv2fyTato8EDm/eQ8TSGkt72JjHPBPNIXhROOeWwD4vaMYwjR232AV0dn7bt/F
0OdcLzYmtV+Xz7Ttml3fEwklsUTFWmLvickvHLq+M9n468xv2s0pr0YevxOkCmtFK8w0
XRzg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaXIzq6gB4UzeqKp1NbwqOyVBna6iPL1lLZo/a61LRwIHDP5kevv
+BOJIiosUG57G9R+8yvoFGlEc9o3bJ8KeStTlatuiQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+QxIfKwLLXzO6ZhmVs2euT1nm2sddkarGcpKXib09O6jNX6P4Cpfsbkcq4IDQTIJbIA0m0yJRM4ZoURjhG3ju4=
X-Received: by 10.37.198.5 with SMTP id k5mr5683727ybf.514.1509373590567; Mon,
30 Oct 2017 07:26:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.135.11 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 07:26:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.37.135.11 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 07:26:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABuOfui=G_iSaKdeVZ=M_udg-DoqAVxCrHOZaHuSJze4+N7CLw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABuOfujV1gAaSOKBB7S0_JKuwp+3iNhY5kN59F3LLndPENUA_Q@mail.gmail.com>
<CAOxie=En8EqfuEtaPxH_v-2SYfUunudb4Zu0MQ-ZfEiPMxa6AQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CABuOfui=G_iSaKdeVZ=M_udg-DoqAVxCrHOZaHuSJze4+N7CLw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 07:26:29 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPg+sBiZGwQup0QRWVnBoHyR5Fx5tB6CtYgX7P=MM1-etm57Ww@mail.gmail.com>
To: shiva sitamraju <shiva@blockonomics.co>,
Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c08d01eb2ffb1055cc46c4b"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Visually Differentiable - Bitcoin Addresses
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 14:26:32 -0000
--94eb2c08d01eb2ffb1055cc46c4b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
On Oct 30, 2017 15:21, "shiva sitamraju via bitcoin-dev" <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
For example bc1qeklep85ntjz4605drds6aww9u0qr46qzrv5xswd35uhjuj8ahfcqgf6hak
in 461e8a4aa0a0e75c06602c505bd7aa06e7116ba5cd98fd6e046e8cbeb00379d6 is 62
bytes !
...
While I get the error/checksum capabilities Bech32 brings, any user would
prefer a 20 byte address with a checksum over an address that would wrap
several lines !!
That's an unfair comparison. You're pasting a P2WSH address which contains
a 256-bit hash.
A P2WPKH address (which only contains a 160-bit hash, just like P2PKH and
P2SH) in Bech32 is only 42 characters, not 62.
Cheers,
--
Pieter
--94eb2c08d01eb2ffb1055cc46c4b
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"auto"><div class=3D"gmail_extra" dir=3D"auto"><div class=3D"gma=
il_quote">On Oct 30, 2017 15:21, "shiva sitamraju via bitcoin-dev"=
; <<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@=
lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>> wrote:<br type=3D"attribution"><blockquot=
e class=3D"quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;pad=
ding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div dir=3D"auto"><div>For example bc1=
qeklep85ntjz4605drds6aww9u0<wbr>qr46qzrv5xswd35uhjuj8ahfcqgf6h<wbr>ak in 46=
1e8a4aa0a0e75c06602c505bd7aa<wbr>06e7116ba5cd98fd6e046e8cbeb003<wbr>79d6 is=
62 bytes !</div></div></div></div></blockquote></div></div><div dir=3D"aut=
o"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">...</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div cl=
ass=3D"gmail_extra" dir=3D"auto"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote cla=
ss=3D"quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-=
left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div dir=3D"auto"><div>While I get the erro=
r/checksum capabilities Bech32 brings, any user would prefer a 20 byte addr=
ess with a checksum=C2=A0 over an address that would wrap several lines !!=
=C2=A0</div></div></div></div></blockquote></div></div><div dir=3D"auto"><b=
r></div><div dir=3D"auto">That's an unfair comparison. You're pasti=
ng a P2WSH address which contains a 256-bit hash.</div><div dir=3D"auto"><b=
r></div><div dir=3D"auto">A P2WPKH address (which only contains a 160-bit h=
ash, just like P2PKH and P2SH) in Bech32 is only 42 characters, not 62.</di=
v><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Cheers,</div><div dir=3D"au=
to"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">--=C2=A0</div><div dir=3D"auto">Pieter</div=
><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div></div>
--94eb2c08d01eb2ffb1055cc46c4b--
|
