1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
|
Return-Path: <btcdrak@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EC46919
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 19 Aug 2015 18:47:56 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-io0-f181.google.com (mail-io0-f181.google.com
[209.85.223.181])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33D5327C
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 19 Aug 2015 18:47:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by iodb91 with SMTP id b91so19762638iod.1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 19 Aug 2015 11:47:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=zT6O6anbCNIIf3u3zoqyn+AVIwiOq5deOTGV5m5EvQQ=;
b=mu5dwl+/hrWmLKDAAKjVb2YeAHzXLjDycSVMfHEEXG+eduhEMf6MYr9rvCdQCg4cRU
kU/EzKmKRYX2eOPtZBqVHPXmKPsTOIAMBC+u4H75zLblqzO27gjyC92sBcB+M/joYr5k
7cMkban/ycsiifHnZPwYb/x1BIqzXo6M9tn7MDSvjznatOZb1rPhoEyBtnDro3W2CuOx
NeAa/wdrTAZ+WBHrxAZu+Kozbke62jd/QZOR1n1mmZXmfO98hgpXW2h8lMNDF0l0OwHL
gPhLKki00Ato/ybl0wyHkJKnoKQRr13RQxw18YsBwuoHR9XhEEqO8Ymp0z8aACeBx97m
Ug6A==
X-Received: by 10.107.148.8 with SMTP id w8mr17408803iod.116.1440010075745;
Wed, 19 Aug 2015 11:47:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.79.81.199 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 11:47:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CADm_WcYdWyeVhfvzbW=smqinCupTEvf7sz=ctU4ht+LssM3=Tw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABm2gDpYdBjyCB=Dor0eE-FdPv9PbVXzWyJf0BPyQ4SDm9VznQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CADJgMzsPT7n+favkjHSuWh1YGQPZQAFLyOgxu4wDNwXSa_-3og@mail.gmail.com>
<CADm_WcYdWyeVhfvzbW=smqinCupTEvf7sz=ctU4ht+LssM3=Tw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Btc Drak <btcdrak@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 19:47:36 +0100
Message-ID: <CADJgMzvCdHk1uo5T3rHyvpAYP1W95h7T+uMhA8vjg2BzEPzy2g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM,
HK_RANDOM_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Separated bitcoin-consensus mailing list (was Re:
Bitcoin XT Fork)
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 18:47:56 -0000
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@gmail.com> wrote:
> bitcoin-dev for protocol discussion and bitcoin-core for Bitcoin Core
> discussion?
Well -dev or both, I dont particularly see a difference at the moment,
and establishing two lists isnt really going to make a difference so
long as Bitcoin Core is the reference client, which it is by defacto.
The risk of having too many lists is interested stakeholders will miss
a discussions. Normal protocol and core discussions are usually pretty
low volume in any case.
> As Jorge notes, a general discussion list has existed for a long time with
> little use.
I would suggest it's only because there havent been any rules for -dev
that would force general discussion over to the bitcoin list. On IRC
we regularly tell people in #bitcoin-dev they are OT and ask them to
move to #bitcoin and as a result, -dev remains quite clear of chit
chat, #bitcoin has a steady stream of general chatter.
We could reduce the OT/noise of bitcoin-dev list considerably by
offloading the non-technical/academic debate to the bitcoin list. It
just needs a bit of shepherding. I am more than happy to help out.
Especially if the list already exists, we should consider making a
decision now.
Who are the moderators for that list? Do we really want to use
sourceforge or are there alternatives, like another list on
linuxfoundation?
ping @Warren.
|
