1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
|
Return-Path: <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DB431018
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:22:29 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com (mail-wi0-f175.google.com
[209.85.212.175])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36920232
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:22:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wicge5 with SMTP id ge5so69512878wic.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 11 Sep 2015 09:22:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
bh=Kjt2aFguqXSfQKL+xVXQ6qyfTK+ZVY+Mj29YuqHgFpk=;
b=gv0oAbLEbS3ciZiRqf+hMC0cxhKruzw2XiCS4T93ZSu7dLuqTPQj0sZAtASzb34SUY
A0jHr45v61xqzCd1xYwpQkOofWHrkMurwJa4fDNGX7mekMYBdj9C0e4aAG0k4xfLLUJs
jADgh/BZt8ynZW13WGAs2nAmYjqZh7Bw251T6lwf0m0V8/gpC4jTkWAS60GOtTVla2jW
ZidQ2q37HSWSDqBzl5jvX9lYE+mDawlkgTMbsfMJHLIioD+8QM4RDXfg0TOZKec0lZT6
cskeB5/rNmdvzgmYmYYf5IXa3cuidCFg7v7kqoWgSAKHVosbML227khomR1ZSPk6yArl
ETbg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlRynDlB60FwRyDWLkI1MB6etqAguTfUOXPVEC/gCyb/B0UzL++joRJedT/evzCtIgZJmlE
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.238.39 with SMTP id vh7mr80322098wjc.109.1441988546576;
Fri, 11 Sep 2015 09:22:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.37.5 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 09:22:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.37.5 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 09:22:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAAUq486GxLw25TW2SV6d8vCCdhY5SEjfdAPCOhV6ta+hoyJY5Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAUq485B5AoTpRBzf0=KFm-k58Zoz+ns-Y7BXc3JwG87VsDo+g@mail.gmail.com>
<CABm2gDrsnVEkcq2CPwK4fcJpwHj6ouTSRnk4U2bMBOPvjRuD_w@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAUq486GxLw25TW2SV6d8vCCdhY5SEjfdAPCOhV6ta+hoyJY5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 18:22:26 +0200
Message-ID: <CABm2gDqArkYxJmQfPKTjPjRQUHXjEjHb+8UUe54RNr6sHiUhKA@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
To: Marcel Jamin <marcel@jamin.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0141aa1a16dd30051f7b1ff1
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Yet another blocklimit proposal / compromise
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:22:29 -0000
--089e0141aa1a16dd30051f7b1ff1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Unfortunately the relation between block maximum size and mining
centralization is much more complex than that.
On Sep 9, 2015 3:00 PM, "Marcel Jamin" <marcel@jamin.net> wrote:
> I think the overlap of people who want to run a serious mining operation
> and people who are unable to afford a slightly above average internet
> connection is infinitesimally small.
>
> 2015-09-09 20:51 GMT+02:00 Jorge Tim=C3=B3n <jtimon@jtimon.cc>:
>
>>
>> On Sep 9, 2015 8:36 PM, "Marcel Jamin via bitcoin-dev" <
>> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > I propose to:
>> >
>> > a) assess what blocklimit is currently technically possible without
>> driving up costs of running a node up too much. Most systems currently
>> running a fullnode probably have some capacity left.
>>
>> What about the risk of further increasing mining centralization?
>>
>
>
--089e0141aa1a16dd30051f7b1ff1
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<p dir=3D"ltr">Unfortunately the relation between block maximum size and mi=
ning centralization is much more complex than that.<br>
</p>
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sep 9, 2015 3:00 PM, "Marcel Jamin"=
<<a href=3D"mailto:marcel@jamin.net">marcel@jamin.net</a>> wrote:<br=
type=3D"attribution"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0=
0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr">I thi=
nk the overlap of people who want to run a serious mining operation and peo=
ple who are unable to afford a slightly above average internet connection i=
s infinitesimally small.<div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_=
quote">2015-09-09 20:51 GMT+02:00 Jorge Tim=C3=B3n <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a=
href=3D"mailto:jtimon@jtimon.cc" target=3D"_blank">jtimon@jtimon.cc</a>>=
;</span>:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px =
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-=
style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><p dir=3D"ltr"><br>
On Sep 9, 2015 8:36 PM, "Marcel Jamin via bitcoin-dev" <<a hre=
f=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">bitcoi=
n-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> I propose to:<br>
><br>
> a) assess what blocklimit is currently technically possible without dr=
iving up costs of running a node up too much. Most systems currently runnin=
g a fullnode probably have some capacity left.</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">What about the risk of further increasing mining centralizat=
ion?<br>
</p>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div>
</blockquote></div>
--089e0141aa1a16dd30051f7b1ff1--
|
