summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/be/f082c5c0c87506b7c176aa2916486efd3c07af
blob: aa3ac3fcb53b4ee88dde4395d9e93fbc0c39165e (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <marek@palatinus.cz>) id 1WXYpP-00067r-SM
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Tue, 08 Apr 2014 16:24:51 +0000
X-ACL-Warn: 
Received: from mail-vc0-f170.google.com ([209.85.220.170])
	by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1WXYpO-0004zS-SV
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Tue, 08 Apr 2014 16:24:51 +0000
Received: by mail-vc0-f170.google.com with SMTP id hu19so1002777vcb.29
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Tue, 08 Apr 2014 09:24:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from
	:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;
	bh=R/2aX0aOUR7lhglJUcnKioZDXT7ZgSwI9J/DKHciB4Y=;
	b=PpUSQYp1XHIaweJSRxxwrPNRzc1jJCMcR+o6iPgqZ9/Z+28tmCLY01j5sbgQjcR6ai
	afayiHmBxmL9B7qpXSqmnKPN8iddwhiiHsqTZ9Yi8jJDdZK0uvERRPgs3ghRwBf2ARi1
	/EF19w+jUTCr0IuyLHxH3CSQYC4RrpPZRFPBIlNGyl1jLQdWf8PlxnaqQR+pkU1jn2VU
	BbZKfiHOOwpGakgLIh3ACPzTbyx5Kbsk9cxerSFWFt9j8kTjuXPSIVitvpFnZS+6qQkM
	6K9FzUDWCQkCNi/bDE+hdXXHE+cCOTO6qn7ajDbInuJSkG+02oTMgvNDoDkHktRMMWYs
	6XNQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn64GHmm61JRT5RpSALjVF3psCC9awOUHwcLM1mf7vjXPFWYie/3Gc93dL10QALR2V+eQbD
X-Received: by 10.220.106.84 with SMTP id w20mr3967815vco.18.1396974285236;
	Tue, 08 Apr 2014 09:24:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: marek@palatinus.cz
Received: by 10.58.234.100 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Apr 2014 09:24:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <li16ac$q0k$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <CANEZrP2hbBVGqytmXR1rAcVama4ONnR586Se-Ch=dsxOzy2O4w@mail.gmail.com>
	<F2C8C044-EF92-4CCE-9235-28CA7FCE3526@bitsofproof.com>
	<CAJHLa0PPAsBLgsy0vgPpUp=UzeR_fWUEzFb5+xtmODEk4MGPVQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJfRnm7V6fgcj=TMfa2ZTYWOKtE5aoUT1xnVtKUSyriB=6cagQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPg+sBjwf1TcK1CGKVKFzYbV-78j8t-pav7=PEgG7Yqi6-yE7A@mail.gmail.com>
	<53344FF8.7030204@gk2.sk>
	<CAPg+sBhbx5vy_hewAkFPaiXHzSMNH0qLhEYGjPmQMjR5StP-tw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJna-Hi0JnrF2_rUx0rGkdnsuCoaD01e3Gobpn+QqbL=D1Uivg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJna-HirtsGLfAhfUf9dAYEGWo6g=o=eAU187c2pdW8vDFGkPw@mail.gmail.com>
	<li12a7$i8o$1@ger.gmane.org>
	<CAJna-HgVs1ahhNKswaKPudwc1AvrBGgdfbZwNCvUPHFzHbh1WA@mail.gmail.com>
	<li16ac$q0k$1@ger.gmane.org>
From: slush <slush@centrum.cz>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 18:24:14 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: QiN1ctjl5_-WEQ7g-xbNB44qq8s
Message-ID: <CAJna-HiunG_SFTtU0Q9Hdq0yof=wuu93oUEnRGAFPF8Y0UN_xQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andreas Schildbach <andreas@schildbach.de>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b3435c008421704f68a6c47
X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(slush[at]centrum.cz)
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
X-Headers-End: 1WXYpO-0004zS-SV
Cc: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net"
	<bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] New BIP32 structure
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 16:24:52 -0000

--047d7b3435c008421704f68a6c47
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Andreas Schildbach <andreas@schildbach.de>wrote:

> On 04/08/2014 05:46 PM, slush wrote:
>
> > It still doesn't mean that bitcoinj or Electrum cannot share the bare
> > minimum of BIP XX. Of course if somebody will use Electrum for 2to3
> > transactions and then move wallet to client which does not offer such
> > feature, it won't work. But I don't see that as a problem.
>
> There is no "bare minimum". Either you implement the "BIP" fully or not.
>

I didn't mean "Bare minimum of some spec", but "spec describing bare
minimum", which is different. I'm sorry for confusion.

Marek

--047d7b3435c008421704f68a6c47
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><br><div class=3D"gmail=
_quote">On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Andreas Schildbach <span dir=3D"ltr=
">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:andreas@schildbach.de" target=3D"_blank">andreas@sc=
hildbach.de</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>

<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class=3D"">On 04/08/2014 05:46 PM, slus=
h wrote:<br><br>
&gt; It still doesn&#39;t mean that bitcoinj or Electrum cannot share the b=
are<br>
&gt; minimum of BIP XX. Of course if somebody will use Electrum for 2to3<br=
>
&gt; transactions and then move wallet to client which does not offer such<=
br>
&gt; feature, it won&#39;t work. But I don&#39;t see that as a problem.<br>
<br>
</div>There is no &quot;bare minimum&quot;. Either you implement the &quot;=
BIP&quot; fully or not.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I didn&#39;t me=
an &quot;Bare minimum of some spec&quot;, but &quot;spec describing bare mi=
nimum&quot;, which is different. I&#39;m sorry for confusion.</div>

<div><br></div><div>Marek</div></div></div></div>

--047d7b3435c008421704f68a6c47--