1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
|
Return-Path: <hearn@vinumeris.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A13BF7AD
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 20 Aug 2015 09:00:16 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-ig0-f172.google.com (mail-ig0-f172.google.com
[209.85.213.172])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87A3D1A6
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 20 Aug 2015 09:00:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by igxp17 with SMTP id p17so124669861igx.1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 20 Aug 2015 02:00:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=vinumeris.com; s=google;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=yJFk2x2XRpf5FM8sdIBF3bDKZRwOYmwSMVIofW5bplU=;
b=c1eN9U39pAN4ki7HC9RlyLUC59HPcn2KT/NxAJs1TfrY6vUGC8wD4xK1OOJ074BO8D
z2PidjqHmB3bfuBPsv7krjst+MojFBaA3sr0jtATePX1GP3bB0ymksKlNIvH7yxf7Fql
G24jvuf3FNrXqSZ1BYM8W6wW4VeJVAuOesIVU=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
bh=yJFk2x2XRpf5FM8sdIBF3bDKZRwOYmwSMVIofW5bplU=;
b=QW9Lk18DHSd7S1nMhi/uxII5q1WVr1VaNJLVChUMWKkY1LvpkY2ogubi2EvRUOKi0D
jXgZMf2C3uScGz9p8sIuIfxMdKGHdaZzgRa0c3EypcIqScRufkDVzadQ9rW0QVsSFJvP
0+BfCzEDLcVY2fH1thqa0YbgctggMkiviDLbCqeZej5UxdRZdUq4RcsiI596WT6P2LsW
Z9dK3qxz0jzKK9Yc8ZPpMc6NwAZnCzcxjl8gHkZNJDHCM2X1iTqRO62ETM99tUdlEkgo
Zgj2senw999KR0ZCWXIUgHMwy+H0sUQqPlzuq0fbJd03k41amZ5mLRq0GffVbyDAdcOe
zHlg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmv4p9aru6xhxlXpFVpGiQGbkyBVBNqh5ynikCJNA68SN+EX6HKjm/H9YaseSPBTaOl9E3P
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.124.4 with SMTP id me4mr7969608igb.34.1440061214837; Thu,
20 Aug 2015 02:00:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.50.208.7 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 02:00:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CALqxMTFkgGx0FxMiZ77inOZSs_+TQ88Wpj-q-c12COkO9tP4gQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALqxMTFkgGx0FxMiZ77inOZSs_+TQ88Wpj-q-c12COkO9tP4gQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 11:00:14 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+w+GKTXAvq76sX4ttiYHhRcGp1MOynGAovYs8Dq1A1Q=9K4KQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mike Hearn <hearn@vinumeris.com>
To: Adam Back <adam@cypherspace.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0111d0c82a6d8b051dba61fa
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham
version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin XT Fork
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 09:00:16 -0000
--089e0111d0c82a6d8b051dba61fa
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> It is just that no one else is reckless enough to bypass the review process
I keep seeing this notion crop up.
I want to kill this idea right now:
- There were months of public discussion leading to up the authoring of
BIP 101, both on this mailing list and elsewhere.
- BIP 101 was submitted for review via the normal process. Jeff Garzik
specifically called Gavin out on Twitter and thanked him for following the
process:
https://twitter.com/jgarzik/status/614412097359708160
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/163
As you can see, other than a few minor typo fixes and a comment by sipa,
there was no other review offered.
- The implementation for BIP 101 was submitted to Bitcoin Core as a pull
request, to invoke the code review process:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6341
Some minor code layout suggestions were made by Cory and incorporated.
Peter popped up to say there was no chance it'd ever be accepted ..... and
no further review was done.
So the entire Bitcoin Core BIP process was followed to the letter. The net
result was this. There were, in fact, bugs in the implementation of BIP
101. They were found when Gavin submitted the code to the XT community
review process, which resulted in *actual* peer review. Additionally, there
was much discussion of technical details on the XT mailing list that
Bitcoin Core entirely ignored.
--089e0111d0c82a6d8b051dba61fa
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blo=
ckquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #c=
cc solid;padding-left:1ex">It is just that no one else is reckless enough t=
o bypass the review=C2=A0process</blockquote><div><br></div><div>I keep see=
ing this notion crop up.</div><div><br></div><div>I want to kill this idea =
right now:</div><div><ul><li>There were months of public discussion leading=
to up the authoring of BIP 101, both on this mailing list and elsewhere.<b=
r><br></li><li>BIP 101 was submitted for review via the normal process. Jef=
f Garzik specifically called Gavin out on Twitter and thanked him for follo=
wing the process:<br><br><a href=3D"https://twitter.com/jgarzik/status/6144=
12097359708160">https://twitter.com/jgarzik/status/614412097359708160</a><b=
r><br><a href=3D"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/163">https://github.c=
om/bitcoin/bips/pull/163</a><br><br>As you can see, other than a few minor =
typo fixes and a comment by sipa, there was no other review offered.<br><br=
></li><li>The implementation for BIP 101 was submitted to Bitcoin Core as a=
pull request, to invoke the code review process:<br><br><a href=3D"https:/=
/github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6341">https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/p=
ull/6341</a><br><br>Some minor code layout suggestions were made by Cory an=
d incorporated. Peter popped up to say there was no chance it'd ever be=
accepted ..... and no further review was done.</li></ul><div>So the entire=
Bitcoin Core BIP process was followed to the letter. The net result was th=
is. There were, in fact, bugs in the implementation of BIP 101. They were f=
ound when Gavin submitted the code to the XT community review process, whic=
h resulted in <i>actual</i>=C2=A0peer review. Additionally, there was much =
discussion of technical details on the XT mailing list that Bitcoin Core en=
tirely ignored.</div></div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div></div></div>
--089e0111d0c82a6d8b051dba61fa--
|
