1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
|
Return-Path: <dscotese@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D84EB90
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 13 Oct 2015 23:52:08 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com (mail-wi0-f173.google.com
[209.85.212.173])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F6B7F3
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 13 Oct 2015 23:52:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wijq8 with SMTP id q8so55721869wij.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 13 Oct 2015 16:52:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
:from:to:cc:content-type;
bh=uTbUsU2eR0YsqOeMmIHt5ATFRBaMz/uvGg0inXiSg+8=;
b=bLCADJ4J4kSJTd4x7X381hHJsylsDpglWVwicbNwe9JQteOsvwyuFB/geE5aLfwu/N
VrYPPPN6uYo5ZBAieF6Y5iYK8SP9/P4leRDkvUq00/1dZS0ZUByu1kKIZDTPj+AR/a0v
b0IWa8wFDBNWhyMWsf0CkLem4/rX4H0ETeLWgSuA2YmMXFvIOMpGwNNCFZ9KZLpJlT9J
PIDa/IBta7Hr0SW53XC9b50oWA6tzBWTm9GVhij/D8/T9Vp8c3ShJy+NJCf1QAgusT8X
IjXvDXI/YhNKwD1gpC7Y5r/onY0l8LY96Hh42mFX1wpcv3enRzgw3U47kUCkaFwj20uj
lETA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.188.169 with SMTP id gb9mr25323342wic.72.1444780325849;
Tue, 13 Oct 2015 16:52:05 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: dscotese@gmail.com
Received: by 10.27.211.132 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 16:52:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <468C1911-C504-4622-BCC8-FF0AAB17E874@toom.im>
References: <99C42DE7-814A-48F8-AB28-A5ADD77A9FD9@toom.im>
<561D8A81.2020109@riseup.net>
<468C1911-C504-4622-BCC8-FF0AAB17E874@toom.im>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 16:52:05 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: -U2fFAK1V-X7UAeaVIbNMJkEXkw
Message-ID: <CAGLBAhdmW6yabrOTFW90jCc9rgH0KapTJFcu2jYLFW6cYdvW_g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Scotese <dscotese@litmocracy.com>
To: bitcoin-xt <bitcoin-xt@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c26bb819d43e05220522bd
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham
version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Memory leaks?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 23:52:09 -0000
--001a11c26bb819d43e05220522bd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
{
"size" : 1085,
"bytes" : 16151768
}
It has been running about a day. I'll report tomorrow too. This is a
Windows 8.1 box.
16 million divided by 1085 transactions is almost 15Kb per transaction =
unlikely, right?
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Jonathan Toomim (Toomim Bros) <j@toom.im>
wrote:
>
> On Oct 13, 2015, at 3:49 PM, odinn <odinn.cyberguerrilla@riseup.net>
> wrote:
>
> Signed PGP part
> It would also help to know what operating system(s) you are
> using for both the oldie and the freshie.
>
>
> Linux feather 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.7-ckt11-1+deb8u3
> (2015-08-04) x86_64 GNU/Linux
> Linux server 3.2.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.2.60-1+deb7u3 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> Linux prime 3.2.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.2.63-2+deb7u2 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> This excessive memory consumption was seen on 3 machines, all of which run
> Debian. All three machines run p2pool as well as bitcoind. Two run XT, one
> runs Core.
>
> You should compare this to having set up a node on a completely clean
> computer.
>
>
> I can't afford to do that. All of the servers I have are being used for
> something. Also, I'm not sure what it is you're trying to test for with
> that suggestion. The numbers I'm reporting are for bitcoind's resident set,
> not for the whole server's memory usage. I don't see how other processes
> running on the same machine are relevant unless you are suggesting that RPC
> calls (e.g. getblocktemplate) might be somehow responsible.
>
> Also, dump your XT, is poo.
>
>
> Not relevant. I addressed this message to both the Core and XT lists
> because the issue appears to affect both forks. Let's keep blocksize and
> governance debates to their own threads, please.
>
> Repeating request: Has anyone else seen something similar? Can you report
> your mempool size and total bitcoind resident set size for your running
> full nodes?
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "bitcoin-xt" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to bitcoin-xt+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
--
I like to provide some work at no charge to prove my value. Do you need a
techie?
I own Litmocracy <http://www.litmocracy.com> and Meme Racing
<http://www.memeracing.net> (in alpha).
I'm the webmaster for The Voluntaryist <http://www.voluntaryist.com> which
now accepts Bitcoin.
I also code for The Dollar Vigilante <http://dollarvigilante.com/>.
"He ought to find it more profitable to play by the rules" - Satoshi
Nakamoto
--001a11c26bb819d43e05220522bd
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">
<table style=3D"margin:0px" border=3D"0" cellpadding=3D"0" cellspacing=3D"2=
">
<tbody><tr>
<td>
<p style=3D"margin:0px;text-indent:0px"><br></p></td>
<td style=3D"vertical-align:middle">
<p style=3D"margin:0px;text-indent:0px">{<br>"size" : 1085,<br>&q=
uot;bytes" : 16151768<br>}</p><p style=3D"margin:0px;text-indent:0px">=
It has been running about a day.=C2=A0 I'll report tomorrow too.=C2=A0 =
This is a Windows 8.1 box.</p><p style=3D"margin:0px;text-indent:0px">16 mi=
llion divided by 1085 transactions is almost 15Kb per transaction =3D unlik=
ely, right?<br></p></td></tr></tbody></table></div><div class=3D"gmail_extr=
a"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Jonathan=
Toomim (Toomim Bros) <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:j@toom.im" ta=
rget=3D"_blank">j@toom.im</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gma=
il_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-lef=
t:1ex"><div style=3D"word-wrap:break-word"><br><div><div>On Oct 13, 2015, a=
t 3:49 PM, odinn <<a href=3D"mailto:odinn.cyberguerrilla@riseup.net" tar=
get=3D"_blank">odinn.cyberguerrilla@riseup.net</a>> wrote:</div><br><blo=
ckquote type=3D"cite"><div style=3D"font-size:12px;font-style:normal;font-v=
ariant:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;line-height:normal;t=
ext-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word=
-spacing:0px"><fieldset style=3D"padding-top:10px;border:3px solid rgb(204,=
204,204);padding-left:20px"><legend style=3D"font-weight:bold">Signed PGP p=
art</legend><span class=3D""><div style=3D"padding-left:3px">It would also =
help to know what operating system(s) you are<br>using for both the oldie a=
nd the freshie.<br></div></span></fieldset></div></blockquote><div><br></di=
v><div><div><div style=3D"margin:0px;font-family:'Andale Mono';colo=
r:rgb(41,249,20);background-color:rgb(0,0,0)">Linux feather 3.16.0-4-amd64 =
#1 SMP Debian 3.16.7-ckt11-1+deb8u3 (2015-08-04) x86_64 GNU/Linux</div></di=
v><div><div style=3D"margin:0px;font-family:'Andale Mono';color:rgb=
(41,249,20);background-color:rgb(0,0,0)">Linux server 3.2.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP =
Debian 3.2.60-1+deb7u3 x86_64 GNU/Linux</div></div><div><div style=3D"margi=
n:0px;font-family:'Andale Mono';color:rgb(41,249,20);background-col=
or:rgb(0,0,0)">Linux prime 3.2.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.2.63-2+deb7u2 x86_=
64 GNU/Linux</div></div><div><br></div><div>This excessive memory consumpti=
on was seen on 3 machines, all of which run Debian. All three machines run =
p2pool as well as bitcoind. Two run XT, one runs Core.</div><span class=3D"=
"><div><br></div><div><blockquote type=3D"cite"><fieldset style=3D"padding-=
top:10px;border:3px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:20px"><div style=3D=
"padding-left:3px">You should compare this to having set up a node on a com=
pletely clean<br>computer.</div></fieldset></blockquote></div><div><br></di=
v></span><div>I can't afford to do that. All of the servers I have are =
being used for something. Also, I'm not sure what it is you're tryi=
ng to test for with that suggestion. The numbers I'm reporting are for =
bitcoind's resident set, not for the whole server's memory usage. I=
don't see how other processes running on the same machine are relevant=
unless you are suggesting that RPC calls (e.g. getblocktemplate) might be =
somehow responsible.</div><span class=3D""><div><br></div><div><blockquote =
type=3D"cite"><fieldset style=3D"padding-top:10px;border:3px solid rgb(204,=
204,204);padding-left:20px"><div style=3D"padding-left:3px">Also, dump your=
XT, is poo.</div></fieldset></blockquote></div><div><br></div></span><div>=
Not relevant. I addressed this message to both the Core and XT lists becaus=
e the issue appears to affect both forks. Let's keep blocksize and gove=
rnance debates to their own threads, please.</div><div><br></div><div>Repea=
ting request: Has anyone else seen something similar? Can you report your m=
empool size and total bitcoind resident set size for your running full node=
s?</div></div></div></div><div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5">
<p></p>
-- <br>
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;bitcoin-xt" group.<br>
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to <a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-xt+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com" target=
=3D"_blank">bitcoin-xt+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com</a>.<br>
For more options, visit <a href=3D"https://groups.google.com/d/optout" targ=
et=3D"_blank">https://groups.google.com/d/optout</a>.<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear=3D"all"><br>-- <br><div class=
=3D"gmail_signature"><div dir=3D"ltr">I like to provide some work at no cha=
rge to prove my value. Do you need a techie?=C2=A0 <br>I own <a href=3D"htt=
p://www.litmocracy.com" target=3D"_blank">Litmocracy</a> and <a href=3D"htt=
p://www.memeracing.net" target=3D"_blank">Meme Racing</a> (in alpha). <br>I=
'm the webmaster for <a href=3D"http://www.voluntaryist.com" target=3D"=
_blank">The Voluntaryist</a> which now accepts Bitcoin.<br>I also code for =
<a href=3D"http://dollarvigilante.com/" target=3D"_blank">The Dollar Vigila=
nte</a>.<br>"He ought to find it more profitable to play by the rules&=
quot; - Satoshi Nakamoto</div></div>
</div>
--001a11c26bb819d43e05220522bd--
|
