summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/bd/a7567320451ab66b3ba0a007a36676d4a4231e
blob: 56bfa7bd82f952e82eb6c3569630bed18d432fc7 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <decker.christian@gmail.com>) id 1RLiQb-0000Ov-7W
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 02 Nov 2011 21:32:57 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 74.125.82.53 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=74.125.82.53; envelope-from=decker.christian@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-ww0-f53.google.com; 
Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53])
	by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1RLiQa-0007Qn-8l
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 02 Nov 2011 21:32:57 +0000
Received: by wwg7 with SMTP id 7so845358wwg.10
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Wed, 02 Nov 2011 14:32:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.227.202.140 with SMTP id fe12mr7745799wbb.27.1320269570098;
	Wed, 02 Nov 2011 14:32:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.227.37.214 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 14:32:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1320268981.72296.YahooMailNeo@web121003.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
References: <1320268981.72296.YahooMailNeo@web121003.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
From: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 22:32:10 +0100
Message-ID: <CALxbBHXOO+p40Q_j7sPK+cG1yGyDWo3fT2_Nd8xhsWmoXD5LNA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174481ecbbc7d804b0c7368e
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(decker.christian[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1RLiQa-0007Qn-8l
Cc: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net"
	<bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Lock protocol version numbers
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 21:32:57 -0000

--0015174481ecbbc7d804b0c7368e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I don't really get what you want to achieve with this. The protocol will be
slow down evolution (hopefully) soon, while the clients will continue
releasing at a similar rhythm. It took long enough to decouple the protocol
version from being bumped each client release, now doing the inverse
coupling makes no sense.

Regards,
Chris
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 10:23 PM, Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Hey,
>
> Can we lock the version numbers to be the protocol version (which changes
> rarely) and instead use the sub_version_num field + revision number for
> individual builds?
>
> Satoshi 0.4
> BitcoinJava 120311
> bitcoin-js 6
>
> Like so. Otherwise we will have version bumping insanity :)
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> RSA(R) Conference 2012
> Save $700 by Nov 18
> Register now
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
>

--0015174481ecbbc7d804b0c7368e
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I don&#39;t really get what you want to achieve with this. The protocol wil=
l be slow down evolution (hopefully) soon, while the clients will continue =
releasing at a similar rhythm. It took long enough to decouple the protocol=
 version from being bumped each client release, now doing the inverse coupl=
ing makes no sense.<br>

<br>Regards,<br>Chris<br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at =
10:23 PM, Amir Taaki <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:zgenjix@yahoo.=
com">zgenjix@yahoo.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_=
quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1=
ex;">

<div><div style=3D"color:#000;background-color:#fff;font-family:times new r=
oman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><div>Hey,</div><div><br></div>=
<div>Can we lock the version numbers to be the protocol version (which chan=
ges rarely) and instead use the sub_version_num field + revision number for=
 individual builds?</div>

<div><br></div><div>Satoshi 0.4</div><div>BitcoinJava 120311</div><div>bitc=
oin-js 6</div><div><br></div><div>Like so. Otherwise we will have version b=
umping insanity :)</div></div></div><br>-----------------------------------=
-------------------------------------------<br>


RSA(R) Conference 2012<br>
Save $700 by Nov 18<br>
Register now<br>
<a href=3D"http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1" target=3D"_blank">http://p.s=
f.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1</a><br>___________________________________________=
____<br>
Bitcoin-development mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net">Bitcoin-develo=
pment@lists.sourceforge.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development=
" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de=
velopment</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>

--0015174481ecbbc7d804b0c7368e--