summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/bd/90bcbedf1c71f8bd659ea9292237008daf4f90
blob: f2868f997d7d5baa33747559a038773cff540a7d (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
Return-Path: <david.vorick@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E40F483
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue,  9 Feb 2016 23:24:31 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-vk0-f50.google.com (mail-vk0-f50.google.com
	[209.85.213.50])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08190189
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue,  9 Feb 2016 23:24:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-vk0-f50.google.com with SMTP id k196so1981427vka.0
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue, 09 Feb 2016 15:24:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc
	:content-type; bh=RCpNzmGsrt0wFwcffeaRsZA5KCsGPz5pYTMQnARJojE=;
	b=Dmj1EuR/x1s6nMeNlQCXIlp+vHGEf8xEVZXLfIIH7Mmiz/QOVpBvIqF3NUcZ523jo1
	9xklN43o7A+MZd5LZdbnxiygfrCJiNz5FQCHV0a7SqBLCGFB21t2IrTWGJkx9e1sZAOE
	h2lNywiZEOTJOQ/FPjVZW365eP0WchA1ya6yv56pfbWSZvzEWnzpNKBEIUrh3TFFsgsJ
	L0116/lAPkJHV51I0ayfUy1g2takTk+x5CBq+O/7l8IdfwpW1Sopkvsn3tvHHXC1sgAM
	tsLMmxrPy6M/LaG1+RRI3qJPf3b+P/5Jm7n3i1QOanbFTbwSTwGjAlxDIddJ4NM3Y0wJ
	Gg+w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:cc:content-type;
	bh=RCpNzmGsrt0wFwcffeaRsZA5KCsGPz5pYTMQnARJojE=;
	b=Lx2laCPIvdvpjIvDvC+egHH25ag3qICwKxCMstMi7xg+9jGPq9x+qYyrDUtSS+glrR
	zCEko/DXYOxGkVVWyF6Ix79OVOCURSnKZSZzgMJTV0HlDyclv1I7Y5OBYNkej3Sd6Wvu
	ysNiqKs6muG8CR1hEIds58vrjqHenVtYStCOr+XuD1jviZh/AYvwRoJoE3lyI/7HaAhz
	+TLEMVBJy4XLq0PA1bhL0TGl1pDfft1oNxRS3LH9OYKXtAqzNpimGTLn9XGFnbo/OVkI
	O5ORMeuS9VomBbA3H/+Qu0XZA2CprVjEOVoEvx+4TFCn+ni2hp/ccQJkRg7zG6wCsXMv
	MpqQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOR67q6U4CeIv3lH8rdXbU2rGjYsZyYXb2QRiB1VmLOHjG8Uqw5hjyVbKFJTwwEDqTBh8yR5VZN8FdTLSA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.31.169.67 with SMTP id s64mr28160316vke.72.1455060269177;
	Tue, 09 Feb 2016 15:24:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.31.9.72 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 15:24:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.31.9.72 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 15:24:28 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAGLBAhfBwxnYyN=8EmpaZrfZSDWTL1StZOpqUO3scdzTu+Qxdw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <87si1rycux.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <2998879.R5sQRbxZRv@1337h4x0r>
	<87powvy20w.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <1736759.DT0dcscznj@1337h4x0r>
	<20160123205953.GA22494@muck>
	<3B18134A-3E3A-4A98-ADD3-9F5E8600047E@gmail.com>
	<CAGLBAhfBwxnYyN=8EmpaZrfZSDWTL1StZOpqUO3scdzTu+Qxdw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 18:24:28 -0500
Message-ID: <CAFVRnyoimj1USUWSF9V7VWg-MyqSqBVmr5KuVv9DM7a1FqvJAA@mail.gmail.com>
From: David Vorick <david.vorick@gmail.com>
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11415d2678a0f9052b5e9eb2
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,
	MALFORMED_FREEMAIL, 
	MISSING_HEADERS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Three Month bitcoin-dev Moderation Review
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 23:24:31 -0000

--001a11415d2678a0f9052b5e9eb2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I do like that the volume of emails has been reduced substantially. I used
to delete hordes of dev emails because I couldn't keep up. At least now I
feel like I'm able to skim most things that look interesting and I get to
assume that if the subject seems relevant to me the content is worthwhile.

My life has improved because of the changes.
On Jan 23, 2016 8:08 PM, "Dave Scotese via bitcoin-dev" <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> +1
> The distinction we are making importantly requires that contributors
> provide readers with another thing to say in favor of something - another
> thing which is different than "X people support this instead of only X-1
> people."  Evidence trumps votes.
>
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Gavin via bitcoin-dev <
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> > On Jan 23, 2016, at 3:59 PM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev <
>> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > I would extend this to say that the technical explanation also should
>> > contribute uniquely to the conversation; a +1 with an explanation
>> > the last +1 gave isn't useful.
>>
>> Yes, comments should contribute to the discussion, with either technical
>> discussion or additional relevant data. I think a +1 like the following
>> should be encouraged:
>>
>> "+1: we had eleven customer support tickets in just the last week that
>> would have been prevented if XYZ.
>>
>> Jane Doe, CTO CoinBitChainBasely.com"
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> bitcoin-dev mailing list
>> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> I like to provide some work at no charge to prove my value. Do you need a
> techie?
> I own Litmocracy <http://www.litmocracy.com> and Meme Racing
> <http://www.memeracing.net> (in alpha).
> I'm the webmaster for The Voluntaryist <http://www.voluntaryist.com>
> which now accepts Bitcoin.
> I also code for The Dollar Vigilante <http://dollarvigilante.com/>.
> "He ought to find it more profitable to play by the rules" - Satoshi
> Nakamoto
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
>

--001a11415d2678a0f9052b5e9eb2
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<p dir=3D"ltr">I do like that the volume of emails has been reduced substan=
tially. I used to delete hordes of dev emails because I couldn&#39;t keep u=
p. At least now I feel like I&#39;m able to skim most things that look inte=
resting and I get to assume that if the subject seems relevant to me the co=
ntent is worthwhile.</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">My life has improved because of the changes.</p>
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Jan 23, 2016 8:08 PM, &quot;Dave Scotese via =
bitcoin-dev&quot; &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.o=
rg">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br type=3D"attribu=
tion"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-l=
eft:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div>+1<br></div>The =
distinction we are making importantly requires that contributors provide re=
aders with another thing to say in favor of something - another thing which=
 is different than &quot;X people support this instead of only X-1 people.&=
quot;=C2=A0 Evidence trumps votes.<br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br>=
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Gavin via bitco=
in-dev <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfound=
ation.org" target=3D"_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>&gt;<=
/span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8=
ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span><br>
&gt; On Jan 23, 2016, at 3:59 PM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev &lt;<a href=3D=
"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">bitcoin-de=
v@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; I would extend this to say that the technical explanation also should<=
br>
&gt; contribute uniquely to the conversation; a +1 with an explanation<br>
&gt; the last +1 gave isn&#39;t useful.<br>
<br>
</span>Yes, comments should contribute to the discussion, with either techn=
ical discussion or additional relevant data. I think a +1 like the followin=
g should be encouraged:<br>
<br>
&quot;+1: we had eleven customer support tickets in just the last week that=
 would have been prevented if XYZ.<br>
<br>
Jane Doe, CTO CoinBitChainBasely.com&quot;<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">=
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail=
man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear=3D"all"><br>-- <br><div><div dir=3D"ltr">I=
 like to provide some work at no charge to prove my value. Do you need a te=
chie?=C2=A0 <br>I own <a href=3D"http://www.litmocracy.com" target=3D"_blan=
k">Litmocracy</a> and <a href=3D"http://www.memeracing.net" target=3D"_blan=
k">Meme Racing</a> (in alpha). <br>I&#39;m the webmaster for <a href=3D"htt=
p://www.voluntaryist.com" target=3D"_blank">The Voluntaryist</a> which now =
accepts Bitcoin.<br>I also code for <a href=3D"http://dollarvigilante.com/"=
 target=3D"_blank">The Dollar Vigilante</a>.<br>&quot;He ought to find it m=
ore profitable to play by the rules&quot; - Satoshi Nakamoto</div></div>
</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.=
linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail=
man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div>

--001a11415d2678a0f9052b5e9eb2--