1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
|
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <zgenjix@yahoo.com>) id 1SfbTi-0007Gq-UQ
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Fri, 15 Jun 2012 18:42:38 +0000
X-ACL-Warn:
Received: from nm32-vm2.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([98.138.229.50])
by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with smtp (Exim 4.76)
id 1SfbTh-0005bu-WC for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Fri, 15 Jun 2012 18:42:38 +0000
Received: from [98.138.90.53] by nm32.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
15 Jun 2012 18:42:32 -0000
Received: from [98.138.89.240] by tm6.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
15 Jun 2012 18:42:32 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1013.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
15 Jun 2012 18:42:32 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 538466.73172.bm@omp1013.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 10634 invoked by uid 60001); 15 Jun 2012 18:42:32 -0000
X-YMail-OSG: B7lTSEIVM1mfVuxTO9T9ocCIa99pDrz1uMLv.dEs44rIRSr
yt7JOhADd7DJbCNrqLy1Wd0qG28rj5i2QfAkWo7kv_k2t50khZe8_1vmnbiN
BUozbF94ymmFE7xVwdMa9prvMtT70nBm_R0lgDrQZ0ChLRmjxG45RrvrK5L6
8oWPPrD9wnFeOsAhqrMdFP01uYGXpflrK78szkYLKEKM0FkaP8IgQy64nsTj
ej3xLzkGlcqKzSDs5jXQqEcJ8udcCbI0a4tM7M_KP0hXzcvs76RZ3SudD5oc
budGlllYqcu9f0khMsrP4KdyJzXD0Rl7CQzVtr8bC17PcDP2iWG6tLXGBc5x
_XBX0Utqbd_qeCSMYncAIPFiZKdnXt4c3JbQRcHSxWGsdt5zs4UtPymtrow0
N4.rMoouRfAAMBc.0xNTWCfo1NGBwANs_RcLf0vrKn8DvAzxKCG4bVeXfyZi
zc8NKLGBLweSqKlTU_N407eidAMschIRIUY5bx6KnWP0SBZzq2FHHBlMVv8u
26vDxc7GA3Lao
Received: from [213.129.230.10] by web121004.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP;
Fri, 15 Jun 2012 11:42:32 PDT
X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.118.349524
References: <CA+8xBpecVQcTTbPxUm_3_GWC99dEd4=-VFWb+QT6jUy4rg8U4w@mail.gmail.com>
<CANEZrP0kNZDByHpK2=UjP+ag0X1KmqHxnJdm=e_pWMitP4QvvA@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+8xBpcwhQPQRe=stYb9xksLsTbiABKLS7PZnRtvPga6AmSg4Q@mail.gmail.com>
<CANEZrP39RHfCDX-x4ARo+oPphLv-70RxuMh3+AJzsNPxzOd=bA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1339785752.91313.YahooMailNeo@web121004.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 11:42:32 -0700 (PDT)
From: Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com>
To: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net"
<bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
In-Reply-To: <CANEZrP39RHfCDX-x4ARo+oPphLv-70RxuMh3+AJzsNPxzOd=bA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
no trust [98.138.229.50 listed in list.dnswl.org]
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(zgenjix[at]yahoo.com)
-0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
domain
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
0.0 FSL_FREEMAIL_2 FSL_FREEMAIL_2
0.0 FSL_FREEMAIL_1 FSL_FREEMAIL_1
X-Headers-End: 1SfbTh-0005bu-WC
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] New P2P commands for diagnostics,
SPV clients
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com>
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 18:42:39 -0000
Why though? The bottleneck is not network traffic but disk space usage/bloc=
kchain validation time.=0A=0A=0A=0A----- Original Message -----=0AFrom: Mik=
e Hearn <mike@plan99.net>=0ATo: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@exmulti.com>=0ACc: Bit=
coin Development <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>=0ASent: Friday=
, June 15, 2012 3:43 PM=0ASubject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] New P2P comman=
ds for diagnostics, SPV clients=0A=0A> Yes, the format is something that mu=
st be hashed out (no pun=0A> intended). =A0Need input from potential users =
about what information=0A> they might need.=0A=0AMatts point that a branch-=
per-transaction may duplicate data is well=0Amade, that said, I suspect a f=
ormat that tries to fix this would be=0Amuch more complicated.=0A=0AHow abo=
ut see this project as a three part change?=0A=0AFirst step - add the mempo=
ol command and make nodes sync up their=0Amempools on startup.=0A=0ASecond =
step - if protocol version >=3D X, the "block" message consists=0Aof a head=
er + num transactions + vector<hash>=A0 instead of the full=0Atransactions =
themselves.=0A=0AOn receiving such a block, we go look to see which transac=
tions we're=0Amissing from the mempool and request them with getdata. Each =
time we=0Areceive a tx message we check to see if it was one we were missin=
g=0Afrom a block. Once all transactions in the block message are in=0Amemor=
y, we go ahead and assemble the block, then verify as per normal.=0AThis sh=
ould speed up block propagation. Miners have an incentive to=0Aupgrade beca=
use it should reduce wasted work.=0A=0AThird step - new message, getmerklet=
x takes a vector<hash> and returns=0Aa merkletx message: "merkle branch mis=
sing the root + transaction data=0Aitself" for each requested transaction. =
The filtering commands are=0Aadded, so the block message now only lists tra=
nsaction hashes that=0Amatch the filter which can then be requested with ge=
tmerkletx.=0A=0A-----------------------------------------------------------=
-------------------=0ALive Security Virtual Conference=0AExclusive live eve=
nt will cover all the ways today's security and =0Athreat landscape has cha=
nged and how IT managers can respond. Discussions =0Awill include endpoint =
security, mobile security and the latest in malware =0Athreats. http://www.=
accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/=0A__________________________=
_____________________=0ABitcoin-development mailing list=0ABitcoin-developm=
ent@lists.sourceforge.net=0Ahttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bi=
tcoin-development=0A
|
