1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
|
Return-Path: <aymeric@peersm.com>
Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC71BC0012
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 13 Dec 2021 13:17:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4AA0421BF
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 13 Dec 2021 13:17:21 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id NoQk2_x0Tm3S
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 13 Dec 2021 13:17:19 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: delayed 00:30:07 by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from 2.mo552.mail-out.ovh.net (2.mo552.mail-out.ovh.net
[178.33.105.233])
by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9094D421BD
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 13 Dec 2021 13:17:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mxplan6.mail.ovh.net (unknown [10.108.20.55])
by mo552.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BA3B22E8A;
Mon, 13 Dec 2021 12:40:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from peersm.com (37.59.142.105) by DAG6EX1.mxp6.local (172.16.2.51)
with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2,
cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.17; Mon, 13 Dec
2021 13:40:50 +0100
Authentication-Results: garm.ovh; auth=pass
(GARM-105G00618b28c72-cb7c-403e-b16a-cd90d8993fa9,
E5D1569A86B6CA2C96D54010462A08A8BE481A6F) smtp.auth=aymeric@peersm.com
X-OVh-ClientIp: 92.184.100.56
To: Pieter Wuille <bitcoin-dev@wuille.net>, Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>, Prayank <prayank@tutanota.de>
References: <MqZttWy--3-2@tutanota.de>
<1fbf0ef8b1b42979361b5df0b09c2dcd@willtech.com.au>
<dSBrti8VFr0lMNgTHw8pD-mAPLm0E4auJa234o0FNY67EUuEy1Dfb93INNIzoUb3j2dWSJjZtG7qncci1LhKAHOXzAzbEWOtXjnggr19J6w=@wuille.net>
<86d49c80-2f8f-245c-5fdb-17c6ca6b5f2b@peersm.com>
<CALL-=e5mv5cr=Oqip0ob8P2XCbWPgOc67nnRjn7_OuDXPYUpVg@mail.gmail.com>
<10dcd9a9-0c39-7f4f-acde-04912a32e103@peersm.com>
<cd6J1hP7ryGspj5LgGk8uwSsh5FGoDwW9UCp4qHhbSn3MXgzMw1slbo8xwWv9kZxn95CcPPE5elPiOktz4-1drpiOgfi-TtGzr66cdS6AuI=@wuille.net>
From: Aymeric Vitte <aymeric@peersm.com>
Message-ID: <6341eec0-e6d8-fe15-4fde-b98d87b00c92@peersm.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 13:40:51 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <cd6J1hP7ryGspj5LgGk8uwSsh5FGoDwW9UCp4qHhbSn3MXgzMw1slbo8xwWv9kZxn95CcPPE5elPiOktz4-1drpiOgfi-TtGzr66cdS6AuI=@wuille.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Originating-IP: [37.59.142.105]
X-ClientProxiedBy: DAG4EX2.mxp6.local (172.16.2.32) To DAG6EX1.mxp6.local
(172.16.2.51)
X-Ovh-Tracer-GUID: 54c24d42-7e95-4345-9ef4-e9a552241709
X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 4562990851737215965
X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK
X-VR-SPAMSCORE: 0
X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrkeekgdegfecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfqggfjpdevjffgvefmvefgnecuuegrihhlohhuthemucehtddtnecunecujfgurhepuffvfhfhkffffgggjggtgfhisehtqhertddtfeehnecuhfhrohhmpeethihmvghrihgtucggihhtthgvuceorgihmhgvrhhitgesphgvvghrshhmrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeukeehhffhfeehtdegveeijeevvddvieevheffkeelteevfeetieejtdehfefgveenucffohhmrghinhepphgvvghrshhmrdgtohhmnecukfhppedtrddtrddtrddtpdefjedrheelrddugedvrddutdehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdphhgvlhhopehmgihplhgrnheirdhmrghilhdrohhvhhdrnhgvthdpihhnvghtpedtrddtrddtrddtpdhmrghilhhfrhhomheprgihmhgvrhhitgesphgvvghrshhmrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepsghithgtohhinhdquggvvhesfihuihhllhgvrdhnvght
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 13:46:14 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Rebroadcast mechanism in Bitcoin P2P network
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 13:17:21 -0000
> It's just one example of a downside of (a particular way of) using
> Tor. That doesn't mean I recommend against using Tor for Bitcoin
> traffic at all; my point was simply that there are trade-offs, and
> aspects of privacy of the P2P protocol that Tor does not address, and
> thus one shouldn't assume that all problems are solved by "just use Tor=
".
There are many downsides since the default behavior of the Tor network
does not apply to p2p networks, another example is a bitcoin node
exiting transactions (I thought you were referring to this), since the
same Tor circuit is used during some time most likely the transactions
are related to the same node even if we don't know its IP
According to the bitcoin github example discussion link I gave, I am not
saying that Tor network nodes should not be used, I am saying that they
should be used =E0 la node-Tor, or more precisely like the github example=
and http://www.peersm.com/Convergence-2020.pdf, one of the main
differences are how behave the first node (ie the originating bitcoin
node), HS/RDV, nb of hops, hybrid nodes
Another drawback is that bitcoin community lets bitcoin nodes operators
play the way they like with torrc
@Prayank, regarding js/webrtc my previous answer was not partial, please
email in private if you need more, it's just a part of the project (but
important since disruptive), which is already advertised widely
(bitcoin, ipfs, covid apps, videoconf, etc, there are plenty of links on
github, lists, specs discussion, probably I should reference them), the
answer is always the same: "very interesting, go ahead", but no, it is
designed to be integrated by the projects, not by myself, and the only
thing missing to get rid of myself is to release phase4
|
