1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
|
Return-Path: <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C328271
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 3 Oct 2016 06:17:28 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-ua0-f173.google.com (mail-ua0-f173.google.com
[209.85.217.173])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEA6E117
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 3 Oct 2016 06:17:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ua0-f173.google.com with SMTP id v7so67483861uaa.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 02 Oct 2016 23:17:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=jtimon-cc.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=rECCjFmfhRg0LR0RuDiIFxgx9RAom6Z5lkbFy5WwjEE=;
b=ZNrXgd+j0BIGfkqQ7kbUky9mbiE5C6/Z+zePNUj3B8xJId733hAePehUr3tlxncCBW
8EPjpbGU3XLyA6phbpKmSmUinHe3lrUFt8KBHeHqm+H1wPoPaaw41bU+lbLKwr4RPo5M
agOD04gFP6Ir4RfA+p2KS7FnZCAdTXXE7hTop8xSsbLp6Y7AuYJB/AQtbupuUKB5Gati
Y9i/BO2fZ1/GiKfJJ3avmvsREXg59svkCb8GgmFjqcux9nuiXgfsnVR6nbYbAPVljhrs
Le2shXcHkB4qy9bRmsxeerOoVGPwSVRK/9pJp7SxH8xxaQrAO0VmpErXsrxIycXSD06X
8hFQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to;
bh=rECCjFmfhRg0LR0RuDiIFxgx9RAom6Z5lkbFy5WwjEE=;
b=YHwBAd9e/F8GonSTFCUXA66xXh4EOKgGJh3x+HGBnVcUpApAGzuo+8O4575by9hbV9
h5ukkH5H60/EdYe7iJ0F7SjrCJ9EU+c8H2kdQs8gBYuoqPRBhuidr5SxdNurALYBrs7f
Va4Ny6kOex4yojtTpd2qjY20JEL0OjNvHsGClKl09Td5uwZKtxsn00XoLfzaULDeD5fL
bJwqgZNtwm2/weq9uK8XzQtGyCdq94UOt71Wian7PfdQsEy3ByRHMshMF9dyxc8sAhx9
14GQM/PPRa+/Uojk65Jc1PPGDSuwlst/R1pbB6cgvsgtkAZKsc3avdoEMiRDWFoYwNEa
cEpw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RmnxJPIvQjuwBgZxROyv0FGnOJpiDHDXwo/Lp1L3WthJYaZCBHGg64CDwiV9KpkE8+z8d2QTzRPNtffqQ==
X-Received: by 10.176.0.176 with SMTP id 45mr6305192uaj.90.1475475446848; Sun,
02 Oct 2016 23:17:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.155.136 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Oct 2016 23:17:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.31.155.136 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Oct 2016 23:17:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAKzdR-r1mFZidZXDSmwVtHZ-KKPwsjZOHZycqR+H+KUBGBFydQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKzdR-r1mFZidZXDSmwVtHZ-KKPwsjZOHZycqR+H+KUBGBFydQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 08:17:25 +0200
Message-ID: <CABm2gDpA=uOw7g-ARn3QoDPj1jRSyjsADsZmTvV2cfx97Q5RWw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
Sergio Demian Lerner <sergio.d.lerner@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113dd198e2765f053defe56d
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] The use OP_COUNT_ACKS for paying for a common
good for miners
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2016 06:17:28 -0000
--001a113dd198e2765f053defe56d
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
When would miners vote no to receive more funds?
Also, why would they spend the funds buying X once they get them?
On Oct 3, 2016 00:58, "Sergio Demian Lerner via bitcoin-dev" <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> One side benefit of OP_COUNT_ACKS is that it enables a completely
> different use case:
>
> It allow users to pay for any service miners can provide as group for the
> common good (e.g. fee payment smoothing over many blocks). For instance,
> users could pay miners to jointly buy better Internet service to improve
> bandwidth or reduce latency between them.
>
> By sending bitcoins to a script containing OP_COUNT_ACKS requiring 51% of
> miners approval and adding a special text tag to such outputs such as
> "FOR-MINERS-TO-BUY-X", users can send bitcoins to miners and ask the
> majority of them to vote on the proposal, if accepted create a transaction
> to redeem those funds. This could help to address the so-called tragedy of
> the commons problem that Bitcoin may face in in long-term, by users
> crowdfunding mining of the following n blocks.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
>
--001a113dd198e2765f053defe56d
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<p dir=3D"ltr">When would miners vote no to receive more funds?<br>
Also, why would they spend the funds buying X once they get them?</p>
<div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Oct 3, 2016 00=
:58, "Sergio Demian Lerner via bitcoin-dev" <<a href=3D"mailto=
:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.o=
rg</a>> wrote:<br type=3D"attribution"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote"=
style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><d=
iv dir=3D"ltr">One side benefit of OP_COUNT_ACKS is that it enables a compl=
etely different use case:<br><br>It allow users to pay for any service mine=
rs can provide as group for the common good (e.g. fee payment smoothing ove=
r many blocks). For instance, users could pay miners to jointly buy better =
Internet service to improve bandwidth or reduce latency between them.<br>=
=C2=A0<br>By sending bitcoins to a script containing OP_COUNT_ACKS requirin=
g 51% of miners approval and adding a special text tag to such outputs such=
as=C2=A0 "FOR-MINERS-TO-BUY-X", users can send bitcoins to miner=
s and ask the majority of them to vote on the proposal, if accepted create =
a transaction to redeem those funds. This could help to address the so-call=
ed tragedy of the commons problem that Bitcoin may face in in long-term, by=
users crowdfunding mining of the following n blocks.<br><br></div>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.=
<wbr>linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.<wbr>org=
/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-<wbr>dev</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div></div>
--001a113dd198e2765f053defe56d--
|
