summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/ba/d93c8d591aed53d2781f8061a1e94389d7fdf2
blob: c5de58d1a549142e0fc72bcf380d2a4d0a913be9 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <ibrightly@gmail.com>) id 1Z2kkK-0007QQ-IB
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 10 Jun 2015 18:29:04 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.214.171 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.214.171; envelope-from=ibrightly@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-ob0-f171.google.com; 
Received: from mail-ob0-f171.google.com ([209.85.214.171])
	by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1Z2kkJ-0000Uu-DI
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 10 Jun 2015 18:29:04 +0000
Received: by obbgp2 with SMTP id gp2so41250488obb.2
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Wed, 10 Jun 2015 11:28:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.5.4 with SMTP id o4mr4013093obo.67.1433960935964; Wed,
	10 Jun 2015 11:28:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.76.177.164 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 11:28:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <557869F9.8030109@AndySchroder.com>
References: <1943127.DBnVxmfOIh@1337h4x0r>
	<20150610093556.GA11409@amethyst.visucore.com>
	<557869F9.8030109@AndySchroder.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 14:28:55 -0400
Message-ID: <CAAre=yQSkFAHLfJ0h2rQY5vOFExSq2GDiRV32qe=EEVYOxCpqg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ivan Brightly <ibrightly@gmail.com>
To: Andy Schroder <info@andyschroder.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134b02c35c8fd05182e0cc1
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(ibrightly[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1Z2kkJ-0000Uu-DI
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Is SourceForge still trustworthy enough
 to host this list?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 18:29:04 -0000

--001a1134b02c35c8fd05182e0cc1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I like elegant solutions and while eventually I can see a "pay to
contribute" service, I don't imagine you'll get consensus in short order.

List provider costs are pretty reasonable, so if that's the hurdle to
overcome I'm happy to offer sponsorship.

Ivan Brightly
SolidX Partners

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Andy Schroder <info@andyschroder.com>
wrote:

> Regarding changing the e-mail list provider. Is anyone interested in
> sponsoring it? There are non-free options, but it may be difficult to
> always ensure the fee is being paid to the provider. I think finding an
> agreeable free solution may have been the issue before? I've also
> thought of trying to make a pay per message or byte solution (and this
> cost could be dynamic based upon the number of current mailing list
> subscribers). This could solve the who pays problem (the sender pays),
> as well as motivate people to be more concise and clear with their
> messages, and at the same time limit spam.
>
>
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Andy Schroder
>
> On 06/10/2015 05:35 AM, Wladimir J. van der Laan wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 10:25:12AM +0200, xor wrote:
> >>
> http://www.howtogeek.com/218764/warning-don%E2%80%99t-download-software-from-sourceforge-if-you-can-help-it/
> > All our downloads (even old ones) have recently been deleted from
> sourceforge, for this reason. They haven't been mentioned in Bitcon Core
> release announcements for a long time.
> >
> > No opinion on the mailing list. Though I think it's less urgent. The
> issue of moving the mailinglist has come up before a few times and people
> can't agree where to move to.
> >
> > Wladimir
> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>

--001a1134b02c35c8fd05182e0cc1
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">I like elegant solutions and while eventually I can see a =
&quot;pay to contribute&quot; service, I don&#39;t imagine you&#39;ll get c=
onsensus in short order.<div><br></div><div>List provider costs are pretty =
reasonable, so if that&#39;s the hurdle to overcome I&#39;m happy to offer =
sponsorship.<div><br></div><div>Ivan Brightly</div><div>SolidX Partners</di=
v></div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On =
Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Andy Schroder <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=
=3D"mailto:info@andyschroder.com" target=3D"_blank">info@andyschroder.com</=
a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0=
 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Regarding changing t=
he e-mail list provider. Is anyone interested in<br>
sponsoring it? There are non-free options, but it may be difficult to<br>
always ensure the fee is being paid to the provider. I think finding an<br>
agreeable free solution may have been the issue before? I&#39;ve also<br>
thought of trying to make a pay per message or byte solution (and this<br>
cost could be dynamic based upon the number of current mailing list<br>
subscribers). This could solve the who pays problem (the sender pays),<br>
as well as motivate people to be more concise and clear with their<br>
messages, and at the same time limit spam.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Any thoughts?<br>
<br>
Andy Schroder<br>
<br>
On 06/10/2015 05:35 AM, Wladimir J. van der Laan wrote:<br>
&gt; On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 10:25:12AM +0200, xor wrote:<br>
&gt;&gt; <a href=3D"http://www.howtogeek.com/218764/warning-don%E2%80%99t-d=
ownload-software-from-sourceforge-if-you-can-help-it/" target=3D"_blank">ht=
tp://www.howtogeek.com/218764/warning-don%E2%80%99t-download-software-from-=
sourceforge-if-you-can-help-it/</a><br>
&gt; All our downloads (even old ones) have recently been deleted from sour=
ceforge, for this reason. They haven&#39;t been mentioned in Bitcon Core re=
lease announcements for a long time.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; No opinion on the mailing list. Though I think it&#39;s less urgent. T=
he issue of moving the mailinglist has come up before a few times and peopl=
e can&#39;t agree where to move to.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Wladimir<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; ----------------------------------------------------------------------=
--------<br>
<br>
<br>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Bitcoin-development mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net">Bitcoin-develo=
pment@lists.sourceforge.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development=
" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de=
velopment</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>

--001a1134b02c35c8fd05182e0cc1--