1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
|
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <zgenjix@yahoo.com>) id 1RLiH6-0008O5-59
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 02 Nov 2011 21:23:08 +0000
X-ACL-Warn:
Received: from nm5-vm4.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([98.138.91.165])
by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with smtp (Exim 4.76)
id 1RLiH5-0003xR-9B for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 02 Nov 2011 21:23:07 +0000
Received: from [98.138.90.54] by nm5.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
02 Nov 2011 21:23:02 -0000
Received: from [98.138.89.246] by tm7.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
02 Nov 2011 21:23:02 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1060.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
02 Nov 2011 21:23:02 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 96074.72318.bm@omp1060.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 80152 invoked by uid 60001); 2 Nov 2011 21:23:02 -0000
X-YMail-OSG: 7nnN9ygVM1mqiPsClDpCEaEfjtagmj1LCjcl02vyLEWrA1D
Eqamj48_OxY9Ky0NSb1zV6eXAUso3vic9_Un4fOJPzaH_6hXRqk778MQZ6Jo
fGgfgw2I8m.MmopJewU.N_4mYdZ3rZTRtkmrncZPUl3wEss1S0KnVihyxBA4
wZ7x9HxwfpNuYaYcoZt.LQp_0ZIZmjJ74AXLv43s14gwFKF5r9e26ojAMb_C
pfwCsgurRtsUg_8gtmGKNjll53zvhIIm01mctEId35qa6h3_MjSL9C_DYYDS
ASyiStl5szziWq4b8fFBKBiS7R9D_Q.4XcZepMsg93gFbDxUUA7D062L4mse
BZ5SSd1XhGfxdTiQDY3fUfK3zNDdXgQvrzxLO
Received: from [92.20.177.18] by web121003.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP;
Wed, 02 Nov 2011 14:23:01 PDT
X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.115.325013
Message-ID: <1320268981.72296.YahooMailNeo@web121003.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 14:23:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com>
To: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net"
<bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="-2027350018-509219541-1320268981=:72296"
X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
no trust [98.138.91.165 listed in list.dnswl.org]
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(zgenjix[at]yahoo.com)
-1.2 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
domain 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1RLiH5-0003xR-9B
Subject: [Bitcoin-development] Lock protocol version numbers
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com>
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 21:23:08 -0000
---2027350018-509219541-1320268981=:72296
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Hey,
Can we lock the version numbers to be the protocol version (which changes rarely) and instead use the sub_version_num field + revision number for individual builds?
Satoshi 0.4
BitcoinJava 120311
bitcoin-js 6
Like so. Otherwise we will have version bumping insanity :)
---2027350018-509219541-1320268981=:72296
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
<html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><div>Hey,</div><div><br></div><div>Can we lock the version numbers to be the protocol version (which changes rarely) and instead use the sub_version_num field + revision number for individual builds?</div><div><br></div><div>Satoshi 0.4</div><div>BitcoinJava 120311</div><div>bitcoin-js 6</div><div><br></div><div>Like so. Otherwise we will have version bumping insanity :)</div></div></body></html>
---2027350018-509219541-1320268981=:72296--
|
