1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
|
Return-Path: <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9212786
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 10 Aug 2015 20:17:54 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com (mail-wi0-f173.google.com
[209.85.212.173])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD4B11AB
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 10 Aug 2015 20:17:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wibhh20 with SMTP id hh20so166330133wib.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 10 Aug 2015 13:17:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
bh=LscrtWPkqHrwzSdwMAu53PZ9TFxtsUDAxV0LKONbetM=;
b=YXOVBURj5M65kymKVm266s38ynA3M3Y/VYNFHQMOdQ5OOcDQ/APwaWoxvZ0/bQe92M
ojnlma1kMCIH7i391J4VAshc2At0o0k3rlQkNrdeueq7lURaIWYA/aZeEkSSHNSwVQ9R
8Bg4TyLKSwCCmnoizK0DQxjtdyGxUObJJ0S8vniSroPa/hAHCv3A8H28+JtVHTAcMrlq
sQtWAAlhmMQp0QGvPko7kNONyknT7wnXa6JV/x3Lt2WpAdboerAnRjjnBUMHh5I2z75W
3EcNSa43TWFRTpju/MgXGDGcj7donlN7/xOcHx4jDrsQYJjMCUc69PLdWA1gCGjfa/KU
0O9A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk3Y/QrTazAWIK4seqzPKKzCmFpfSFgQSEUx8Oi4UDi0mUt3iBaqJEDi79NZ4vUd72IP3lX
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.21.175 with SMTP id w15mr28880867wie.58.1439237872104;
Mon, 10 Aug 2015 13:17:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.31.230 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 13:17:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1725491.c810VbMBxP@coldstorage>
References: <8185694.hShCHQnpze@coldstorage>
<20150808085451.4689995.38052.4163@thomaszander.se>
<CALqxMTELM5Q+q_g0Tz-tR8sU0bqFx+Piops1FX+xnn-Lk7oM2Q@mail.gmail.com>
<1725491.c810VbMBxP@coldstorage>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 22:17:52 +0200
Message-ID: <CABm2gDrJH8-6VPp1Lk4ueJA2ShOU+evTgK-S1zNjuqN8h8Je+Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
To: Thomas Zander <thomas@thomaszander.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] trust
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 20:17:54 -0000
On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Thomas Zander via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Saturday 8. August 2015 12.54.36 Adam Back wrote:
>> On 8 August 2015 at 09:54, Thomas Zander <thomas@thomaszander.se> wrote:
>> > I didn't say off-chain, and gave an example of on-chain usecase with
>> > trusted middleman.
>> That's basically the definition of off-chain. When we say MtGox or
>> coinbase etc are off-chain transactions, that is because a middle man
>> has the private keys to the coins and gave you an IOU of some kind.
>
> I'm so sorry to have to correct you again, and please don't feel bad about
> misreading my post twice.
>
> Sending something to another Bitcoin on-chain user is really on-chain. Please
> believe me when I say that I actually understand my own example.
Adam, I think he means a multisig escrow transaction where the escrow
is trusted by both parties, and other examples like that.
But I don't see how that is relevant, allowing trust to be involved in
different ways is a feature, but it's optional.
I think the point "you don't need to trust anyone to use Bitcoin" remains.
|
