summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/b7/ed7207dea9de034c4078086754ee3225520d43
blob: 2ea9b2b61ebb1d762bd06cbc7850e7e16c55ea99 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
Return-Path: <hectorchu@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CB9B3EE
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 17 Aug 2015 19:16:26 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-la0-f54.google.com (mail-la0-f54.google.com
	[209.85.215.54])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4C40211
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 17 Aug 2015 19:16:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by lalv9 with SMTP id v9so85438100lal.0
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 17 Aug 2015 12:16:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
	:cc:content-type;
	bh=/cN3MiY6Un86a01x/EfmNt/62FqwH+OIetefCIfQlN8=;
	b=gZC76a94FIMEhhSYZRj49ey95AyOWGIADCEsmhjcc6ODwa9UMd9aqF+gV7L7M5w32v
	7st7stZr9XnLA2McJCGGniQ5o9RxzRGB6MIctwjoebrEtuvVlDXHuUKYbcWOGVKV2IuH
	k/XC7ttIzbGyE9bvuFqExqcsNelsSIw63U4Rvtfq1YlTBgtRQeC0D2icnSI1qi4bXpgK
	TEN9sFt4v8ZCcWqeTN2FdXL+5OgWt2PsRnSIXB+8vlV1Uzv62/spTKXoFN98gLDGHvPa
	VDWBsUTIskKwy+C35AmYE2lD25yewvKOHqlqush+tN6SxIITX158xlJzA8qswxcuy2BZ
	0eFA==
X-Received: by 10.112.17.70 with SMTP id m6mr2348695lbd.113.1439838984228;
	Mon, 17 Aug 2015 12:16:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.22.25 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 12:16:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <6EC9DDF352DC4838AE9B088AB372428A25E1F42A@DS04>
References: <6EC9DDF352DC4838AE9B088AB372428A25E1F42A@DS04>
From: Hector Chu <hectorchu@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 20:16:04 +0100
Message-ID: <CAAO2FKF85Q-SoTEeVrYLEh-ZiEsGoMe1zzbDVdZy3FLbwU5yQg@mail.gmail.com>
To: satoshi@vistomail.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3d3e23053e4051d86a387
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin XT Fork
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 19:16:26 -0000

--001a11c3d3e23053e4051d86a387
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On 15 August 2015 at 18:43, Satoshi Nakamoto via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> I suspect we need a better incentive for users to run nodes instead of
> relying solely on altruism.
>

Is he talking about "full nodes" i.e. validating-only, or nodes in the
sense of the original whitepaper (i.e. miners)? Because there is already
plenty of incentive for running a node (i.e. the coinbase).

The issue is that the reward is more or less like a decentralised lottery
with high entry cost. If the income could be smoothed like in a mining
pool, without actually being a mining pool, then perhaps more people would
pay to enter the mining game. A bit like making P2Pool the one and only
pool allowed on the network.

--001a11c3d3e23053e4051d86a387
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On 1=
5 August 2015 at 18:43, Satoshi Nakamoto via bitcoin-dev <span dir=3D"ltr">=
&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_bla=
nk">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockqu=
ote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc s=
olid;padding-left:1ex">I suspect we need a better incentive for users to ru=
n nodes instead of relying solely on altruism.<br></blockquote><div><br></d=
iv><div>Is he talking about &quot;full nodes&quot; i.e. validating-only, or=
 nodes in the sense of the original whitepaper (i.e. miners)? Because there=
 is already plenty of incentive for running a node (i.e. the coinbase).</di=
v><div><br></div><div>The issue is that the reward is more or less like a d=
ecentralised lottery with high entry cost. If the income could be smoothed =
like in a mining pool, without actually being a mining pool, then perhaps m=
ore people would pay to enter the mining game. A bit like making P2Pool the=
 one and only pool allowed on the network.</div></div></div></div>

--001a11c3d3e23053e4051d86a387--