1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
|
Return-Path: <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BD1E7F
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 17 Aug 2015 15:58:21 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-la0-f44.google.com (mail-la0-f44.google.com
[209.85.215.44])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D23EE5
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 17 Aug 2015 15:58:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by lagz9 with SMTP id z9so82026244lag.3
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 17 Aug 2015 08:58:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
bh=f+kYvaW7/3tmvf40kEGTPbwIO8pcDD3mwcf/LVBKcfM=;
b=XgicJG9/rXwSA7tdSnVlAYUdt8EA9zCHARLzdwVh3kGn7b25uX4CFIvjOIGiVqID3z
wx9gISuZppBFXnAdL63Of41NgLpYsMRH5CM5wfDZ8ia/lKjDRS5L0JN3Q5nEvfvnTiGW
TTSYds+1nWED3/i1Um3FaAZfHl9GCt/ZlG6fZjYDZSUMZVATUWBIaGA3w/GKAg+4yFRw
CRQFKL0gf4z0h7FQiWppV/kRCwSigk+i71Xf/A+IaUOCB0bdso/nQeGnXhT88c6i76V6
BDFO3yFQhmA+0Ct5U2l0d8ACP1kOZk7LWw3qJeChPRM6SephtWBsBlgipffnOSMVhGMB
azVg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmWBzfb88W9nGKCA38lYUBP0Sgr0BJdvQf+W2b9aN7abl4HFF6oLnBnT6moQhNyf7DZVBaw
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.151.178 with SMTP id ur18mr1685252lbb.59.1439827099028;
Mon, 17 Aug 2015 08:58:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.25.15.22 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 08:58:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <55890C4C.3070909@jrn.me.uk>
References: <CABsx9T2HegqOBqd1jijk1bZBE6N+NH8x6nfwbaoLBACVf8-WBQ@mail.gmail.com>
<20150622192308.GA23545@savin.petertodd.org>
<55890C4C.3070909@jrn.me.uk>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 17:58:18 +0200
Message-ID: <CABm2gDqhCVqPjwh51Gbi9oH23ffQQgTfyZhYU9y4s170Om4VRQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
To: Ross Nicoll <jrn@jrn.me.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Draft BIP : fixed-schedule block size increase
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 15:58:21 -0000
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Ross Nicoll <jrn@jrn.me.uk> wrote:
> I don't think essentially replacing most of Testnet with a specialised test
> chain is a good idea, but this might be a good time to consider a 4th test
> network with very large blocks from genesis onwards.
You may be interested in this patch/PR:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6382
Why only one more testchain when you can add
std::numeric_limits<uint64_t>::max() new testchains with approximately
the same code?
|
